四川盆地元坝地区自流井组页岩储层孔隙结构特征

doi:10.11743/ogg20210412

石油与天然气地质 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 909-918.doi: 10.11743/ogg20210412

四川盆地元坝地区自流井组页岩储层孔隙结构特征

姜涛^1,^2,^3,^4,⁵(), 金之钧^1,^2,^3,^4,⁶, 刘光祥^3,⁴, 胡宗全^3,⁴, 刘全有^3,⁴, 刘忠宝^3,⁴, 王鹏威^3,⁴, 王濡岳^3,⁴, 杨滔^3,^4,⁷, 王冠平^3,⁴

1. 北京大学造山带与地壳演化教育部重点实验室, 北京 100871
2. 北京大学石油与天然气研究中心, 北京 100871
3. 页岩油气富集机理与有效开发国家重点实验室, 北京 100083
4. 中国石化页岩油气重点实验室, 北京 100083
5. 中国地质科学院, 北京 100037
6. 北京大学能源研究院, 北京 100871
7. 中国石化河南油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 河南郑州 450046

收稿日期:2019-07-25 出版日期:2021-08-28 发布日期:2021-08-27
第一作者简介:姜涛(1988-), 男, 博士研究生, 非常规油气勘探开发。E-mail: jiangtao1988@pku.edu.cn
基金项目:
国家科技重大专项(2017ZX05036004);中国石油化工股份有限公司技术开发项目(P19017-2)

Pore structure characteristics of shale reservoirs in the Ziliujing Formation in Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin

Tao Jiang^1,^2,^3,^4,⁵(), Zhijun Jin^1,^2,^3,^4,⁶, Guangxiang Liu^3,⁴, Zongquan Hu^3,⁴, Quanyou Liu^3,⁴, Zhongbao Liu^3,⁴, Pengwei Wang^3,⁴, Ruyue Wang^3,⁴, Tao Yang^3,^4,⁷, Guanping Wang^3,⁴

1. Key Laboratory of Orogenic Belt and Crustal Evolution, Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
2. Institute of Oil&Gas, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
3. State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Beijing 100083, China
4. Key Laboratory of Shale Oil/Gas Exploration and Production, SINOPEC, Beijing 100083, China
5. Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
6. Institute of Energy, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
7. Exploration and Development Research Institute of Henan Oilfield Branch Company, SINOPEC, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046, China

Received:2019-07-25 Online:2021-08-28 Published:2021-08-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

四川盆地元坝地区自流井组页岩是陆相页岩气的主要研究层段之一，目前正处于勘探攻关的重要阶段。页岩孔隙结构是评价页岩储层储集能力的重要指标，是明确页岩气富集机理的关键。采用总有机碳含量、全岩X衍射、N₂吸附-高压压汞孔径联合实验及氩离子抛光-扫描电镜等多种实验测试方法对其孔隙结构进行了定量表征。结果表明：自流井组页岩粘土矿物含量高，介于38.8%~67.3%，平均为52.8%。孔隙类型以矿物基质孔隙为主，有机质孔次之，微裂缝局部发育；N₂吸附滞后环反应主要发育平行板状狭缝型孔隙，同时含有少量墨水瓶型孔；主要孔径分布区间为中孔，大安寨段与东岳庙段相比，由于微孔比例偏低，宏孔比例偏高，所以中值孔径与孔体积较大、比表面积相对较小。自流井组页岩储层孔体积与比表面积主要由粘土矿物决定，孔体积和比表面积与TOC呈负相关或无关，主要由于有机质内镜质体与丝质体不发育孔隙，以及可溶有机质对孔体积和吸附位的占据。研究成果对研究区陆相页岩气的研究与勘探具有重要的借鉴和指导意义。

关键词: 孔隙结构, 定量表征, 陆相页岩储层, 自流井组, 元坝地区, 四川盆地

Abstract:

Shale of the Ziliujing Formation in Yuanba area of Sichuan Basin, currently at a critical stage of exploration, is one of the main research targets of terrestrial shale gas.As a significant index to evaluate the storage capacity of shale reservoirs, shale pore structure is the key to clarify the enrichment mechanism of shale gas.In this study, the pore structure is quantitatively characterized through an integration of total organic carbon (TOC) content tests, whole rock X-ray diffraction, combined experiment of N₂ adsorption and high-pressure mercury intrusion for pore size and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after argon ion milling.The results show that the Ziliujing Formation shale is dominated by clay minerals, accounting for 38.8% to 67.3% with an average of 52.8%;the pores are mainly matrix pores, followed by organic pores, and with micro-fractures developed locally.The hysteresis loops of N₂ adsorption reflect the well development of parallel plate-like slit pores together with a small amount of ink bottle-shaped pores.The main interval of pore size distribution falls in mesopores.Compared with Dongyuemiao Member, Da'anzhai Member contains fewer micropores and more macropores, leading to a higher median value of pore size and pore volume, while a relatively smaller specific surface area (SSA).The pore volume and SSA of shale reservoirs in the Ziliujing Formation depend on clay minerals.The pore volume and SSA are in a negative correlation or irrelevant with the TOC content, mainly due to the infertility of organic pores in vitrinite and filament and the occupation of pore volume and adsorption sites by soluble organic matters.These will be of referential significance to the exploration of terrestrial shale gas in the study area.

Key words: pore structure, quantitative characterization, terrestrial shale reservoir, Ziliujing Formation, Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

姜涛,金之钧,刘光祥,等. 四川盆地元坝地区自流井组页岩储层孔隙结构特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(4): 909-918. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210412 Tao Jiang,Zhijun Jin,Guangxiang Liu,et al. Pore structure characteristics of shale reservoirs in the Ziliujing Formation in Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(4): 909-918. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210412

图/表 10

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

参考文献 40

1	Curtis J B . Fractured Shale-gas systems[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86 (11): 1921- 1938.
2	董大忠, 王玉满, 李新景, 等. 中国页岩气勘探开发新突破及发展前景思考[J]. 天然气工业, 2016, 36 (1): 19- 32.
	Dong Dazhong , Wang Yuman , Li Jingxin , et al. Breakthrough and prospect of shale gas exploration and development in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 36 (1): 19- 32.
3	Montgomery S L , Jarvie D M , Bowker K A , et al. Mississippian Barnett shale, Fort Worth Basin, north-central Texas: Gas shale play with Multitrillion Cubic Foot Potential[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2005, 89 (2): 155- 175. doi: 10.1306/09170404042
4	董大忠, 邹才能, 戴金星, 等. 中国页岩气发展战略对策建议[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27 (3): 397- 406.
	Dong Dazhong , Zou Caineng , Dai Jinxing , et al. Suggestions on the development strategy of shale gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Geos cience, 2016, 27 (3): 397- 406.
5	Zhang K , Jiang Z , Yin L , et al. Controlling functions of hydrothermal activity to shale gas content: Taking lower Cambrian in Xiuwu Basin as an example[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2017, 85, 177- 193. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.05.012
6	袁玉松, 方志雄, 何希鹏, 等. 彭水及邻区龙马溪组页岩气常压形成机制[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10 (1): 9- 16.
	Yuan Yusong , Fang Zhixiong , He Xipeng , et al. Normal pressure formation mechanism of Longmaxi shale gas in Pengshui and its adjacent areas[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10 (1): 9- 16.
7	高波, 刘忠宝, 舒志国, 等. 中上扬子地区下寒武统页岩气储层特征及勘探方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (2): 284- 294.
	Gao Bo , Liu Zhongbao , Shu Zhiguo , et al. Reservoir characteristics and exploration of the Lower Cambrian shale gas in the Middle-Upper Yangtze area[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (2): 284- 294.
8	朱彤, 包书景, 王烽. 四川盆地陆相页岩气形成条件及勘探开发前景[J]. 天然气工业, 2012, (9): 16- 21+126-127. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2012.09.004
	Zhu Tong , Bao Shujin , Wang Feng . Pooling conditions of non-marine shale gas in the Sichuan Basin and its exploration and development prospect[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2012, (9): 16- 21+126-127. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2012.09.004
9	金之钧, 胡宗全, 高波, 等. 川东南地区五峰组-龙马溪组页岩气富集与高产控制因素[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23 (1): 1- 10.
	Jin Zhijun , Hu Zongquan , Gao Bo , et al. Controlling factors on the enrichment and high productivity of shale gas in the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations, southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23 (1): 1- 10.
10	龙胜祥, 曹艳, 朱杰, 等. 中国页岩气发展前景及相关问题初探[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37 (6): 847- 853.
	Long Shengxiang , Cao Yan , Zhu Jie , et al. A preliminary study on prospects for shale gas industry in China and relevant issues[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37 (6): 847- 853.
11	杨峰, 宁正福, 孔德涛, 等. 高压压汞法和氮气吸附法分析页岩孔隙结构[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24 (3): 450- 455.
	Yang Feng , Ning Zhengfu , Kong Detao , et al. Pore structure of shales from High Pressure Mercury Injection and Nitrogen Adsorption method[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 24 (3): 450- 455.
12	姜振学, 唐相路, 李卓, 等. 川东南地区龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构全孔径表征及其对含气性的控制[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23 (2): 126- 134.
	Jiang Zhenxue , Tang Xianglu , Li Zhuo , et al. The whole-aperture pore structure characteristics and its effect on gas content of the Longmaxi Formation shale in the southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23 (2): 126- 134.
13	陈尚斌, 朱炎铭, 王红岩, 等. 川南龙马溪组页岩气储层纳米储集能力特征及其成藏意义[J]. 煤炭学报, 2012, 37 (3): 438- 444.
	Chen Shangbin , Zhu Yanming , Wang Hongyan , et al. Structure cha-racteristics and accumulation significance of nanopores in Longmaxi shale gas reservoir in the southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2012, 37 (3): 438- 444.
14	蔡潇, 靳雅夕, 叶建国, 等. 一种页岩有机孔与无机孔定量表征的方法[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10 (1): 30- 36.
	Cai Xiao , Jin Yaxi , Ye Jianguo , et al. A quantitative characterization method for organic and inorganic pores in shale[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10 (1): 30- 36.
15	Tang X L , Jiang Z X , Li Z , et al. The effect of the variation in material composition on the heterogeneous pore structure of high maturity shale of the Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Southeastern Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 23, 464- 473. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.02.031
16	Jiang T , Jin Z J , Hu Z Q , et al. , Three-Dimensional morphology and connectivity of organic pores in shale from the Wufeng and Longmaxi Formations at the southeast Sichuan Basin in China[J]. Geofluids, 2021, 5579169.
17	杨峰, 宁正福, 胡昌蓬, 等. 页岩储层微观孔隙结构特征[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34 (2): 301- 311.
	Yang Feng , Ning Zhengfu , Hu Changpeng , et al. Characterization of microscopic pore structures in shale reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34 (2): 301- 311.
18	曾维特, 张金川, 丁文龙, 等. 延长组陆相页岩含气量及其主控因素-以鄂尔多斯盆地柳坪171井为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25 (2): 291- 301.
	Zeng Weite , Zhang Jinchuan , Ding Wenlong , et al. The gas content of continental Yanchang Shale and its main controlling factors: A case study of Liupi-171 Well in Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geo-science, 2014, 25 (2): 291- 301.
19	李廷微, 姜振学, 宋国奇, 等. 陆相和海相页岩储层孔隙结构差异性分析[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26 (01): 65- 71.
	Li Tingwei , Jiang Zhenxue , Song Guoqi , et al. Analysis of differences in pore structure between continental and marine shale reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26 (1): 65- 71.
20	Loucks R G , Reed R M , Ruppel S C , et al. Morphology, genesis, and distribution of nanometer scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett Shale[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2009, 79, 848- 861.
21	郑军卫, 孙德强, 李小燕, 等. 页岩气勘探开发技术进展[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2011, 22 (3): 511- 517.
	Zheng Junwei , Sun Deqiang , Li Xiaoyan , et al. Advances in exploration and exploitation technologies of shale gas[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2011, 22 (3): 511- 517.
22	Chen L , Jiang Z X , Liu K Y , et al. Pore structure characterization for organic-rich Lower Silurian shale in the Upper Yangtze Platform, South China: A possible mechanism for pore development[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2017, 46, 1- 15.
23	Wang P F , Jiang Z X , Yin L S , et al. Lithofacies classification and its effect on pore structure of the Cambrian marine shale in the Upper Yangtze Platform, South China: Evidence from FE-SEM and gas adsorption analysis[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2017, 156, 307- 321.
24	刘忠宝, 胡宗全, 刘光祥, 等. 四川盆地东北部下侏罗统自流井组陆相页岩储层孔隙特征及形成控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42 (1): 136- 145.
	Liu Hongbao , Hu Zongquan , Liu Guangxiang , et al. Pore characteristics and controlling factors of continental shale reservoirs in the Lower Jurassic Ziliujing Formation, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42 (1): 136- 145.
25	郭彤楼. 四川盆地北部陆相大气田形成与高产主控因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40 (2): 139- 149.
	Guo Tonglou . Key controls on accumulation and high production of large non-marine gas fields in northern Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40 (2): 139- 149.
26	张莉, 邹华耀, 郝芳, 等. 川东北元坝地区须家河组储层特征与超致密成因探讨[J]. 地质学报, 2017, 91 (9): 2105- 2118.
	Zhang Li , Zou Huayao , Hao Fang , et al. Characteristics and densification causes and of highly-tight sandstone of theXujiahe Formation (T₃x²) in the Yuanba area, Northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2017, 91 (9): 2105- 2118.
27	厚东琳. 白云石化对储层发育的控制作用——以普光、元坝气田飞仙关组为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2019, 26 (4): 449- 452.
	Hou Donglin . Control effect of dolomitization on reservoir development: taking Feixianguan Formation in Puguang and Yanba gas fields for example[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2019, 26 (4): 449- 452.
28	周德华, 焦方正, 郭旭升, 等. 川东北元坝区块中下侏罗统页岩油气地质分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2013, 35 (6): 596- 600+656.
	Zhou Dehua , Jiao Fangzheng , Guo Xusheng , et al. Geologic analysis of Middle-Lower Jurassic shale reservoirs inYuanba area, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2013, 35 (6): 596- 600+656.
29	周德华, 焦方正, 郭旭升, 等. 川东南涪陵地区下侏罗统页岩油气地质特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2013b, 34 (4): 450- 454.
	Zhou Dehua , Jiao Fangzheng , Guo Xusheng , et al. Geologic analysis of Middle-Lower Jurassic shale reservoirs in Yuanba area, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013b, 34 (4): 450- 454.
30	王良军, 王庆波. 四川盆地涪陵自流井组页岩气形成条件与勘探方向[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 43 (5): 757- 764.
	Wang Liangjun , Wang Qingbo . Formation conditions and explorative directions of Jurassic shale gas in Fuling Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 43 (5): 757- 764.
31	聂海宽, 马鑫, 余川, 等. 川东下侏罗统自流井组页岩储层特征及勘探潜力评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38 (3): 438- 447.
	Nie Haikuan , Ma Xin , Yu Chuan , et al. Shale gas reservoir characte-ristics and its exploration potential-analysis on the Lower Jurassic shale in the eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38 (3): 438- 447.
32	Romero-Sarmiento M F , Rouzaud J N , Bernard S , et al. Evolution of Barnett Shale organic carbon structure and nanostructure with increasing maturation[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2014, 71 (6): 7- 16.
33	郭旭升, 李宇平, 刘若冰, 等. 四川盆地焦石坝地区龙马溪组页岩微观孔隙结构特征及其控制因素[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34 (6): 9- 16.
	Gou Xusheng , Li Yuping , Liu Ruobing , et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of micro-pore structures of Longmaxi Shale Play in the Jiaoshiba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34 (6): 9- 16.
34	杨超, 张金川, 李婉君, 等. 辽河坳陷沙三、沙四段泥页岩微观孔隙特征及其成藏意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35 (2): 286- 294.
	Yang Chao , Zhang Jinchuan , Li Wanjun , et al. Microscopic pore cha racteristics of Sha-3 and Sha-4 shale and their accumulation significance inLiaohe Depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35 (2): 286- 294.
35	Cao T T , Song Z G , Wang S B , et al. Characterizing the pore structure in the Silurian and Permian shales of the Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2015, 61, 140- 150.
36	管全中, 董大忠, 王淑芳, 等. 海相和陆相页岩储层微观结构差异性分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27 (3): 524- 531.
	Guan Quanzhong , Dong Dazhong , Wang Shufang , et al. Analyses on differences of microstructure between marine and lacustrine facies shale reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27 (3): 524- 531.
37	汪虎, 何治亮, 张永贵, 等. 四川盆地海相页岩储层微裂缝类型及其对储层物性影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (1): 41- 49.
	Wang Hu , He Zhiliang , Zhang Yonggui , et al. Microfracture types of marine shale reservoir of Sichuan Basin and its influence on reservoirproperty[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (1): 41- 49.
38	唐相路, 姜振学, 李卓, 等. 渝东南地区龙马溪组高演化页岩微纳米孔隙非均质性及主控因素[J]. 现代地质, 2016, 30 (1): 163- 171.
	Tang Xianglu , Jiang Zhenxue , Li Zhuo , et al. Micro/nano pore heterogeneity and main controlling factors of the high-maturity Longmaxi Formation shale in southeastern Chongqing[J]. Geoscience, 2016, 30 (1): 163- 171.
39	李成成, 周世新, 李靖, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组泥页岩孔隙特征及其控制因素[J]. 沉积学报, 2017, 35 (2): 315- 329.
	Li Chengcheng , Zhou Shixin , Li Jing , et al. Pore characteristics and controlling factors of the Yanchang Formation mudstone and shale in the south of Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2017, 35 (2): 315- 329.
40	曹涛涛, 邓模, 刘虎, 等. 可溶有机质对泥页岩储集物性的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30 (3): 43- 51.
	Cao Taotao , Deng Mo , Liu Hu , et al. Influences of soluble organic matter on reservoir properties of shale[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30 (3): 43- 51.

[1]	方锐, 蒋裕强, 杨长城, 邓海波, 蒋婵, 洪海涛, 唐松, 谷一凡, 朱讯, 孙莎莎, 蔡光银. 四川盆地侏罗系凉高山组不同岩性组合页岩油赋存状态及可动性[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 752-769.
[2]	何骁, 郑马嘉, 刘勇, 赵群, 石学文, 姜振学, 吴伟, 伍亚, 宁诗坦, 唐相路, 刘达东. 四川盆地“槽-隆”控制下的寒武系筇竹寺组页岩储层特征及其差异性成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 420-439.
[3]	张赫驿, 杨帅, 张玺华, 彭瀚霖, 李乾, 陈聪, 高兆龙, 陈安清. 川东地区中二叠统茅口组沉积微相与环境演变[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 457-470.
[4]	潘辉, 蒋裕强, 朱讯, 邓海波, 宋林珂, 王占磊, 李杪, 周亚东, 冯林杰, 袁永亮, 王猛. 河流相致密砂岩气地质甜点评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 471-485.
[5]	张宝收, 张本健, 汪华, 陈践发, 刘凯旋, 豆霜, 戴鑫, 陈双玲. 四川盆地金秋气田：一个典型以中生界沉积岩为氦源岩的含氦-富氦气田[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 185-199.
[6]	张自力, 乔艳萍, 豆霜, 李堃宇, 钟原, 武鲁亚, 张宝收, 戴鑫, 金鑫, 王斌, 宋金民. 四川盆地蓬莱气区震旦系灯影组二段岩溶古地貌与控储模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 200-214.
[7]	王光付, 李凤霞, 王海波, 周彤, 张亚雄, 王濡岳, 李宁, 陈昱辛, 熊晓菲. 四川盆地不同类型页岩气压裂难点和对策[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1378-1392.
[8]	胡宗全, 王濡岳, 路菁, 冯动军, 刘粤蛟, 申宝剑, 刘忠宝, 王冠平, 何建华. 陆相页岩及其夹层储集特征对比与差异演化模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1393-1404.
[9]	王红岩, 周尚文, 赵群, 施振生, 刘德勋, 焦鹏飞. 川南地区深层页岩气富集特征、勘探开发进展及展望[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1430-1441.
[10]	边瑞康, 孙川翔, 聂海宽, 刘珠江, 杜伟, 李沛, 王濡岳. 四川盆地东南部五峰组-龙马溪组深层页岩气藏类型、特征及勘探方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1515-1529.
[11]	李双建, 李智, 张磊, 李英强, 孟宪武, 王海军. 四川盆地川西坳陷三叠系盐下超深层油气成藏条件与勘探方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1555-1567.
[12]	曾溅辉, 张亚雄, 张在振, 乔俊程, 王茂云, 陈冬霞, 姚泾利, 丁景辰, 熊亮, 刘亚洲, 赵伟波, 任克博. 致密砂岩气藏复杂气-水关系形成和分布主控因素及分布模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1067-1083.
[13]	李军亮, 王鑫, 王伟庆, 李博, 曾溅辉, 贾昆昆, 乔俊程, 王康亭. 致密砂岩砂-泥结构发育特征及其对储集空间的控制作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1173-1187.
[14]	王宏博, 马存飞, 曹铮, 李志鹏, 韩长城, 纪文明, 杨艺. 基于岩相的致密砂岩差异成岩作用及其储层物性响应[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 976-992.
[15]	刘昇, 范存辉, 张本健, 张亚, 王尉, 罗冰, 白晓亮. 四川盆地东部中二叠统茅口组孤峰段展布特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 993-1008.

四川盆地元坝地区自流井组页岩储层孔隙结构特征

Pore structure characteristics of shale reservoirs in the Ziliujing Formation in Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 40

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics