四川盆地东北部中三叠统雷口坡组四段优质储层发育特征及勘探方向

doi:10.11743/ogg20210411

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为进一步扩大四川盆地东北部地区雷口坡组四段浅滩叠合岩溶型储层探井成功率，实现高效勘探开发。基于区内丰富的钻井、取心和室内分析测试资料，对雷口坡组四段（雷四段）储层基本特征和主控因素进行了综合分析。结果表明：①研究区雷四段属于砂屑滩沉积，储层主要发育于砂屑云岩和岩溶角砾岩中，储集空间类型以溶洞和裂缝为主，储层非均质性较强。②储层主控因素分析认为，潮坪相浅滩发育的原始孔渗系统为优质储层的发育提供了物质基础；岩溶作用叠加改善形成大量有效的储集空间，是储层发育的关键；埋藏期热液溶蚀作用进一步提高储渗性能。③岩溶作用具有特殊的机械充填和化学作用识别标志，不同岩溶地貌单元下岩溶水性质和活动规律的差异最终决定了储层发育质量。川东北地区岩溶丘台侧向近源及断裂叠合发育区是下一步有利勘探方向。

关键词: 岩溶作用, 热液溶蚀作用, 浅滩, 储层特征, 三叠系, 元坝地区, 四川盆地

Abstract:

For the purpose of further enhancing the success rate of exploratory wells emplaced in the superposed shallow-karst reservoirs in the 4th member of Leikoupo Formation (hereinafter referred to as Lei 4 Member) to achieve efficient exploration and development in northeastern Sichuan, we comprehensively analyze the reservoir characteristics and major control factors based on rich data from borehole observation, coring and lab analysis.The results show that (1) the Lei 4 Member in the study area is of intraclastic grainstone shoal facies with reservoirs mainly developed in the doloarenite and karst breccia; and the dominant reservoir space is karst caverns and fractures, featuring relatively strong heterogeneity.(2) The analysis of the reservoir genetic mechanism shows that the original pore system of the shoals of tidal flat facies serves as the material basis for high-quality reservoir development.A mass of reservoir space formed by the transformation of karstification is a factor critical for the reservoir development.Thermal dissolution in the burial stage could further improve the reservoir quality.(3) The karstification shows identification markers special to mechanical filling and chemical reaction, and the property of karst fluid and its activity routines in the different karst geomorphic units serve to determine the reservoir quality.The karst mound-platform, which is near source rock laterally and/or has well-developed fracture system, is a desirable zone for future exploration in the northeastern Sichuan Basin.

Key words: karstification, thermal dissolution, shallow, reservoir characteristics, Triassic, Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

段金宝,金民东,范志伟,等. 四川盆地东北部中三叠统雷口坡组四段优质储层发育特征及勘探方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(4): 898-908. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210411 Jinbao Duan,Mindong Jin,Zhiwei Fan,et al. Characteristics and favorable plays for high-quality reservoirs in the Middle Triassic Lei 4 Member, Yuanba area, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(4): 898-908. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210411

图/表 12

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

表2

图10

参考文献 25

1	黄东, 张健, 杨光, 等. 四川盆地中三叠统雷口坡组地层划分探讨[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 33 (3): 89- 95.
	Huang Dong , Zhang Jian , Yang Guang , et al. The discussion of stratum division and stratum for the Leikoupo Formation of Middle Trias-sic in Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2011, 33 (3): 89- 95.
2	肖开华, 李宏涛, 段永明, 等. 四川盆地川西气田雷口坡组气藏储层特征及其主控因素[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39 (6): 34- 44.
	Xiao Kaihua , Li Hongtao , Duan Yongming , et al. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of the Leikoupo gas pools in the western Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39 (6): 34- 44.
3	郭旭升. 川西地区中、晚三叠世岩相古地理演化及勘探意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31 (5): 610- 619.
	Guo Xusheng . Litho-paleogeographic evolution in the Middle-Late Triassic in western Sichuan Province and its significance for petroleum exploration[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2010, 31 (5): 610- 619.
4	马永生, 陈洪德, 王国立, 等. 中国南方层序地层与古地理[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009: 310- 311.
	Ma Yongsheng , Chen Hongde , Wang Guoli , et al. sequence stratum and paleogeography of South China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2009: 310- 311.
5	范志伟. 元坝气田雷口坡组古溶沟展布及其对气藏的控制[J]. 石油实验地质, 2014, 36 (5): 562- 566.
	Fan Zhiwei . Formation and evolution of weathering-crust reservoir in Leikoupo Formation, Yuanba Area[J]. Natural Gas Technology, 2014, 36 (5): 562- 566.
6	甘学启, 宋文燕, 王志萍. 裂缝对川中雷口坡组风化壳储层发育的影响[J]. 特种油气藏, 2013, 20 (4): 53- 57.
	Gan Xueqi , Song Wenyan , Wang Zhiping . The influence of fractures on the development of weathering crust reservoirs in the Leikoupo Formation in central Sichuan[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2013, 20 (4): 53- 57.
7	马治鸾, 陈洪德, 钟怡江, 等. 四川盆地东北部元坝地区中三叠统雷口坡组四段古岩溶特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 地质通报, 2012, 31 (4): 577- 585. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2012.04.011
	Ma Zhiluan , Chen Hongde , Zhong Yijiang , et al. Paleokarstification in carbonates of 4th Member of Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation in northeastern Sichuan Basin and its petroleum geological significance[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2012, 31 (4): 577- 585. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2012.04.011
8	郭旭升, 胡东风, 李宇平, 等. 四川盆地元坝气田发现与理论技术[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45 (1): 14- 26.
	Guo Xusheng , Hu Dongfeng , Li Yuping , et al. Discovery and theoretical and technical innovations of Yuanba gas field in Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45 (1): 14- 26.
9	胡东风. 普光气田与元坝气田礁滩储层特征的差异性及其成因[J]. 天然气工业, 2011, 31 (10): 17- 21.
	Hu Dongfeng . Differences in reef-bank reservoir features between Puguang and Yuanba gas fields and their reasons[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2011, 31 (10): 17- 21.
10	段金宝, 代林呈, 李毕松, 等. 四川盆地北部上震旦统灯影组四段储层特征及其控制因素[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39 (7): 9- 20.
	Duan Jinbao , Dai Lincheng , Li Bisong , et al. Reservoir characteristics and their controlling factors of the fourth Member of Upper Sinian Dengying Formation in the northern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39 (7): 9- 20.
11	孔强夫, 杨才, 李浩, 等. 基于图论聚类和最小临近算法的岩性识别方法——以四川盆地西部雷口坡组碳酸盐岩储层为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (4): 885- 890.
	Kong Qiangfu , Yang Cai , Li Hao , et al. A lithology recognition method based on multi-resolution graph-based clustering and K-Nearest Neighbor: A case study from the Leikoupo Formation carbonate reservoirs in western Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (4): 885- 890.
12	郝哲敏, 许国明, 陈洪德, 等. 川西坳陷马井地区中三叠统雷四3亚段储层孔隙类型与面孔率定量研究[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (2): 381- 392.
	Hao Zhemin , Xu Guoming , Chen Hongde , et al. Pore classification and thin section porosity quantification of reservoir in the T₂l⁴⁽³⁾ in Majing area, Western Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (2): 381- 392.
13	周凌方, 钱一雄, 宋晓波, 等. 四川盆地西部彭州气田中三叠统雷口坡组四段上亚段白云岩孔隙表征、分布及成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (1): 178- 188.
	Zhou Lingfang , Qian Yixiong , Song Xiaobo , et al. Characteristics, distribution and origin of dolomite reservoir in the upper Lei 4 member of the Middle Triassic, Pengzhou gas field, western Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (1): 178- 188.
14	郭旭升, 胡东风, 段金宝. 中国南方海相油气勘探展望[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42 (5): 675- 686.
	Guo Xusheng , Hu Dongfeng , Duan Jinbao . Marine petroleum exploration in South China[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42 (5): 675- 686.
15	郭旭升, 郭彤楼, 黄仁春, 等. 中国海相油气田勘探实例之十六: 四川盆地元坝大气田的发现与勘探[J]. 海相油气地质, 2014, 19 (4): 57- 64.
	Guo Xusheng , Guo Tonglou , Huang Renchun , et al. Cases of discovery and exploration of marine fields in China (Part 16): Yuanba gas field in Sichuan Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2014, 19 (4): 57- 64.
16	何江, 方少仙, 侯方浩, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中部气田中奥陶统马家沟组岩溶型储层特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2009, 30 (3): 350- 356.
	He Jiang , Fang Shaoxian , Hou Fanghao , et al. Characteristics of karst reservoirs in the Middle Ordovician Majiagou Formation of gas fileds in the central Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2009, 30 (3): 350- 356.
17	Tinker S W, Mruk D H. Reservoir characterization of a Permian giant: Yates field, West Texas[C]//Stoudt E L, Harris P M. Hydrocarbon reservoir characterization: Geologic frame-work and flow unit modeling. Tulsa: SEPM, 1995.
18	Moore C H . Carbonate reservoirs porosity evolution and diagenesis in a sequence stratigraphic framework[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001: 1- 225.
19	施振生, 王秀芹, 吴长江. 四川盆地上三叠统须家河组重矿物特征及物源区意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2011, 22 (4): 618- 627.
	Shi Zhensheng , Wang Xiuqin , Wu Changjiang . The heavy minerals and provenances of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2011, 22 (4): 618- 627.
20	朱梅湘, 张秀莲, 王英华. 中下扬子区三叠纪海相碳酸盐岩成岩作用和成岩环境[J]. 古地理学报, 2000, 2 (4): 43- 50.
	Zhu Meixiang , Zhang Xiulian , Wang Yinghua . The diageneses and diagenetic environments of marine carbonate rocks of the Triassic in the Lower-Middle Yangtze region[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2000, 2 (4): 43- 50.
21	黄思静, 黄可可, 吕杰, 等. 早三叠世海水的碳同位素组成与演化——来自四川盆地东部的研究[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2012, 42 (10): 1508- 1522.
	Huang Sijing , Huang Keke , Lv Jie , et al. Carbon isotopic composition of Early Triassic marine carbonates, Eastern Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Scientia Sinica(Terrae), 2012, 42 (10): 1508- 1522.
22	Allan J R , Wiggins W D . Dolomite reservoirs: Geochemical techniques for evaluating origin and distribution[M]. Tulsa: AAPG, 1996.
23	江青春, 胡素云, 汪泽成, 等. 四川盆地茅口组风化壳岩溶古地貌及勘探选区[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33 (6): 950- 960.
	Jiang Qingchun , Hu Suyun , Wang Zecheng , et al. Paleokarst landform of the weathering crust of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in Sichuan Basin and selection of exploration regions[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33 (6): 950- 960.
24	夏明军, 戴金星, 邹才能, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部加里东期岩溶古地貌与天然气成藏条件分析[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2007, 34 (3): 291- 315.
	Xia Mingjun , Dai Jinxing , Zou Caineng , et al. Caledonian karst palaeogeomorphology and the forming condition of gas pool, southern Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2007, 34 (3): 291- 315.
25	王鑫, 辛勇光, 田瀚, 等. 四川盆地中三叠统雷口坡组沉积储层研究进展[J]. 海相油气地质, 2020, 25 (3): 210- 222.
	Wang Xin , Xin Yongguang , Tian Han , et al. Research progress on sedimentation and reservoir of Leikoupo Formation of Middle Triassic in Sichuan Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2020, 25 (3): 210- 222.

井名	深度/m	岩性	氦气孔隙度/%	平均渗透率/(10^-3μm²)	沉积亚相
YB12	4 658.87	云质角砾岩，角砾成分主要为砂屑白云岩	7.95	32.631 1	颗粒滩
YB12	4 657.09	云质角砾岩，角砾成分主要为砂屑白云岩	6.01	3.041 0	颗粒滩
YB12	4 660.10	砂屑白云岩	4.88	0.008 0	颗粒滩
YB4	5 017.27	灰质白云岩	3.89	313.944 7	台坪
YB204	4 873.71	灰质白云岩	3.81	0.045 4	台坪
YB4	5 014.34	云质角砾岩，角砾成分主要为砂屑白云岩	3.43	0.001 2	颗粒滩
YB204	4 872.31	灰质白云岩	3.11	39.320 5	台坪
YB12	4 661.09	砂屑白云岩	2.96	0.004 1	颗粒滩
YB12	4 664.46	粉-泥晶藻屑白云岩	2.46	35.720 9	台坪
YB12	4 660.30	云质角砾岩，角砾成分主要为砂屑白云岩	2.45	0.323 4	颗粒滩
YB12	4 660.52	粉晶白云岩	2.39	0.601 0	台坪
YB4	5 016.73	粉晶白云岩	2.39	0.106 2	台坪
YB12	4 661.60	粉-泥晶藻屑白云岩	2.38	1.242 1	台坪
YB204	4 863.32	灰质白云岩	2.24	6.832 4	台坪
YB4	5 019.33	灰质白云岩	2.20	164.945 7	台坪
YB12	4 657.49	灰质角砾岩，角砾成分主要为砂屑灰岩	2.13	0.004 3	颗粒滩
YB4	5 020.03	粉晶残余藻屑白云岩	1.88	1.203 5	台坪
YB204	4 877.13	膏质白云岩	1.67	0.006 5	潟湖
YB204	4 875.87	膏质白云岩	1.19	0.002 9	潟湖

井号	埋深/m	含量/%
井号	埋深/m	Na₂O	MgO	K₂O	CaO	FeO	SrO	BaO
YB4	5 016.2	0	21.331	0	30.378	0.806	0.068	0
YB12	4 658.9	0	21.478	0	30.406	0.959	0.013	0
YB204	4 889.9	0	21.404	0.008	30.485	0.827	0	0

[1]	方锐, 蒋裕强, 杨长城, 邓海波, 蒋婵, 洪海涛, 唐松, 谷一凡, 朱讯, 孙莎莎, 蔡光银. 四川盆地侏罗系凉高山组不同岩性组合页岩油赋存状态及可动性[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 752-769.
[2]	何骁, 郑马嘉, 刘勇, 赵群, 石学文, 姜振学, 吴伟, 伍亚, 宁诗坦, 唐相路, 刘达东. 四川盆地“槽-隆”控制下的寒武系筇竹寺组页岩储层特征及其差异性成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 420-439.
[3]	张赫驿, 杨帅, 张玺华, 彭瀚霖, 李乾, 陈聪, 高兆龙, 陈安清. 川东地区中二叠统茅口组沉积微相与环境演变[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 457-470.
[4]	潘辉, 蒋裕强, 朱讯, 邓海波, 宋林珂, 王占磊, 李杪, 周亚东, 冯林杰, 袁永亮, 王猛. 河流相致密砂岩气地质甜点评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 471-485.
[5]	黎瑞, 杨娇, 柴愈坤, 王华, 戴建文, 邓永辉, 孙爽, 马肖琳, 田腾飞. 大角度波浪控制下的浪成砂坝新模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 530-541.
[6]	师良, 范柏江, 李忠厚, 余紫巍, 蔺子瑾, 戴欣洋. 鄂尔多斯盆地中部三叠系延长组7段烃组分的运移分异作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 157-168.
[7]	张宝收, 张本健, 汪华, 陈践发, 刘凯旋, 豆霜, 戴鑫, 陈双玲. 四川盆地金秋气田：一个典型以中生界沉积岩为氦源岩的含氦-富氦气田[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 185-199.
[8]	张自力, 乔艳萍, 豆霜, 李堃宇, 钟原, 武鲁亚, 张宝收, 戴鑫, 金鑫, 王斌, 宋金民. 四川盆地蓬莱气区震旦系灯影组二段岩溶古地貌与控储模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 200-214.
[9]	王光付, 李凤霞, 王海波, 周彤, 张亚雄, 王濡岳, 李宁, 陈昱辛, 熊晓菲. 四川盆地不同类型页岩气压裂难点和对策[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1378-1392.
[10]	胡宗全, 王濡岳, 路菁, 冯动军, 刘粤蛟, 申宝剑, 刘忠宝, 王冠平, 何建华. 陆相页岩及其夹层储集特征对比与差异演化模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1393-1404.
[11]	王红岩, 周尚文, 赵群, 施振生, 刘德勋, 焦鹏飞. 川南地区深层页岩气富集特征、勘探开发进展及展望[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1430-1441.
[12]	边瑞康, 孙川翔, 聂海宽, 刘珠江, 杜伟, 李沛, 王濡岳. 四川盆地东南部五峰组-龙马溪组深层页岩气藏类型、特征及勘探方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1515-1529.
[13]	李双建, 李智, 张磊, 李英强, 孟宪武, 王海军. 四川盆地川西坳陷三叠系盐下超深层油气成藏条件与勘探方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1555-1567.
[14]	曾溅辉, 张亚雄, 张在振, 乔俊程, 王茂云, 陈冬霞, 姚泾利, 丁景辰, 熊亮, 刘亚洲, 赵伟波, 任克博. 致密砂岩气藏复杂气-水关系形成和分布主控因素及分布模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1067-1083.
[15]	刘佳庚, 王艳忠, 操应长, 王淑萍, 李雪哲, 王铸坤. 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷民丰洼陷陡坡带深层-超深层碎屑岩优质储层控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1203-1217.