塔里木盆地东北部奥陶-志留系沉积成岩作用

doi:10.11743/ogg20060114

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

塔里木盆地东北地区奥陶系为一套粉砂质泥岩和灰岩;志留系砂砾岩构成4个沉积旋回,为典型的复理石建造,含油气层位于旋回的底部,4个旋回均已倒转。成岩作用在埋深1500 m已很显著,富含大气CO₂水中沉淀亮晶方解石(Ⅰ),δ¹³c为-4‰-6‰,δ¹⁸0为-5‰～-6‰。埋深2400-2600 m,硫酸盐还原带形成的碳酸盐(Ⅱ)δ¹³C为-7‰～-10‰,δ¹⁸O为-8‰～-10‰,长石溶解形成第一次生孔隙带。埋深3800-4000 m,甲烷生成带脱羧作用产生的CH₄形成波状消光白云石 (Ⅲ),δ¹³C为-1‰～-16‰,而CO₂直接形成的碳酸盐δ¹³C为20‰右右,δ¹⁸O均在-12‰～-13‰,SiO₂次生包体测温110-120℃,形成第二次生孔隙带。埋深4500-4700 m为湿气生成带,形成的碳酸盐(Ⅳ)δ¹³C为-27‰～-31‰,δ¹⁸O为-13‰～-14‰,包体测温130-140℃,含铁方解石大量溶解形成第三次生孔隙带。埋深达到5000 m以上时产生大量干气(Ⅴ), δ¹³C为-18‰～-20‰,δ¹⁸O为-1‰～-14‰,与包体均一温度150-155℃相一致,形成第四次生孔隙带,孔隙度仅15%-20%。海西运动期间褶皱地层可能倒转,抬升剥蚀可能达5000 m左右,接着发生"退成岩作用"。

关键词: 包裹体均一温度, 次生孔隙带, 同位素, 世代, 碳酸盐胶结物, 奥陶-志留系, 塔里木盆地东北部

Abstract:

The Ordovician is composed of silty mudstone and limestone, and the Silurian is a typical flysch formation composed of four depositional cycles of glutinite in the northeastern Tarim basin. The reservoirs occur at the bottom of each cycle. All of the 4 cycles have been inverted. Diagenesis is obvious at a depth of 1 500 m where sparry calcite (Ⅰ) has been precipitated from water rich in atmospheric CO₂ with δ¹³C in the range of -4‰ and -6‰, and 818O in the range of -5‰ and -6‰. At a burial depth of 2 400-2 600 m, δ¹³C and δ¹⁸O in the carbonate (Ⅱ) formed in the sulfate reduction zone are in the range -7‰ to -10‰ and -8‰ to -10‰, respectively, where the dissolution of feldspar constitutes the 1st secondary pore zone. Dolomites (Ⅲ) with wavy extinction have been formed at a burial depth of 3 800-4 000 m, along with the decarboxylation in the methane generating zone, the δ¹³C is in the range of -11‰ and -16‰, while in the carbonate directly formed from CO₂, the δ¹³C is ±20‰, and the δ¹⁸O both in dolomite and carbonate range from -12‰ to -13‰, temperatures measured from secondary SiO₂ inclusions are in the range of 110℃ and 120℃. This interval constitutes the 2nd secondary pore zone. The depth interval of 4 500-4 700 m is a wet gas generating zone, the δ¹³C and δ¹⁸O in carbonate (Ⅳ) formed in this interval are in the range of -27‰ to -31‰ and -13‰ to -14‰, respectively, and the temperature measured from inclusion thermometry is 130 -140℃; and the massive dissolution of ferroan calcite has resulted in the formation of the 3rd secondary pore zone. Large amount of dry gas (Ⅴ) were generated at a burial depth of over 5 000 m, where the 8 C ranges from -18‰ to -20‰ and δ¹⁸O ranges from -13‰% to -14‰, being accordant with the inclusion's homogenization temperature of 150-155℃. This interval constitutes the 4 th secondary pore zone with porosity in the range of 15% to 20%. The folded strata might have been inverted during Hercynian movement, uplifted and eroded about 5 000 m and associated with'retrodiagenesis'.

Key words: homogenization temperature of inclusion, secondary pore zone, isotope, generation, carbonate cement, Ordovician-Silurian, northwestern Tarim basin

中图分类号:

TE111.3

郑冰,承秋泉,高仁祥. 塔里木盆地东北部奥陶-志留系沉积成岩作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2006, 27(1): 85-92. doi: 10.11743/ogg20060114 Zheng Bing,Cheng Qiuquan,Gao Renxiang. Ordovician-Silurian sedimentation and diagenesis in northeastern Tarim basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2006, 27(1): 85-92. doi: 10.11743/ogg20060114

参考文献

[1] Hudson J D.Stable isotopes and limestone lithification [J].Journal of Geological Society,1977,133:637
[2] Lubomir F Jansa,Victor Hugo Noguera Urrea.Geology and diagenetic history of overpressured sandstone reservoirs,Venture gas field,offshore Nova Scotia,Canada [J].AAPG Bull,1990,74(10):1 640-1 658
[3] 罗伊德E.沉积岩和火山岩中矿床成因的气液包裹体证据[A].见:陈安福,卢焕章,余铁阶,编.矿物中的包裹体[C].北京:科学出版社,1989.120～147Royde E.Evidence of gas/liquid inclusions from mineral deposits in sedimentary rocks and volcanic rocks[A].In:Chen Anfu,Lu Huanzhang,Yu Tiejie,eds.Inclusions in Mine-rals [C].Beijing:Science Press,1989.120-147
[4] 凯利W C,瓦格纳G A.综合应用气液包裹体和裂变径迹法的古温度测量方法[A].见:陈安福,卢焕章,余铁阶,编.矿物中的包裹体[C].北京:科学出版社,1989.355～361Kaely W C,Wagner G A.A palaeotemperature measurement with comprehensive application of gas/liquid inclusions and fission tracks[A].In:Chen Anfu,Lu Huanzhang,Yu Tiejie,eds.Inclusions in Minerals[C].Beijing:Science Press,1989.355-361
[5] 米敬奎,戴金星,张水昌.含油气盆地包裹体研究中存在的问题[J].天然气地球科学,2005,16(5):602～605Mi Jingkui,Dai Jinxing,Zhang Shuichang.Some problem existed in research of inclusion occurring in oil-and gas-bearing basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2005,16 (5):602-605
[6] 李汶国,张晓鹏,钟玉梅.长石砂岩次生溶孔的形成机理[J].石油与天然气地质,2005,26(2):220～223Li Wenguo,Zhang Xiaopeng,Zhong Yumei.Formation mechanism of secondary dissolved pores in arcose[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2005,26 (2):220-223
[7] Surdam R C,Crossey L J,Hagen S E,et al.Organic-inorganic interactions and sandstone diagenesis[J].AAPG Bulletin,1989,73:1-12
[8] 张晓鹏,李汶国,彭大经.有机二氧化碳在碳酸盐溶蚀孔隙形成中的作用及定量探讨[J].海相沉积区油气地质,1988,2(2):63 ～71Zhang Xiaopeng,Li Wenguo,Peng Dajing.The action of organic carbon dioxide on the formation of carbonate solution pores and its quantitative approach[J].Oil & Gas Geology in Marine Deposit Region,1988,2(2):63-71
[9] Powell T G.Petroleum geochemistry of the Verrill Canyon Formation:a source for Scotian shelf hydrocarbons [J].Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin,1982,30:668-670
[10] 张以明,侯方浩,方少军,等.冀中饶阳凹陷下第三系沙河街组第三段砂岩次生孔隙形成机制[J].石油与天然地质,1994,15(3):208～215Zhang Yiming,Hou Fanghao,Fang Shaojun,et al.Secondary pore formation mechanism of third member of Shahejie Formation,Raoyang Depression [J].Oil & Gas Geology,1994,15 (3):208-215
[11] 刘文,李永宏,张涛,等.塔河油田奥陶系碳酸盐岩沉积相及地层学研究[J].石油实验地质,2002,24(2):104～109Liu Wen,Li Yonghong,Zhang Tao,et al.Study on the sedimentary facies and sequence stratigraphy of the Ordovician carbonate rock in Tahe oilfield [J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2002,24(2):104-109
[12] Pittman E D.Porosity diagenesis and productive capability of sandstone reservoirs[A].In:Scholle P A,Schluger P A,eds.Aspects of diagenesis [C].SEPM Special Publication,1979,26:159-173
[13] 康玉柱.再论塔里木盆地古生代油气勘探潜力-纪念沙参2井油气重大突破20周年[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(5):479 ～ 483Kang Yuzhu.Re-discussion on exploration potential of Paleozoic in Tarim basin-20th anniversary of significant discovery in Shacan 2 well[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2004,25(5):479-483
[14] 云露,肖志高,徐明军.浅谈塔里木盆地台盆区天然气勘探前景[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(4):428～432Yun Lu,Xiao Zhigao,Xu Mingjun.A brief talk on gas exploration potential in the platform-basin region,Tarim basin [J].Oil &Gas Geology,2004,25(4):428-432

[1]	田辉, 吴子瑾, 盖海峰, 王星. 川西北地区中泥盆统腐泥型烃源岩晚期生气特征实验研究[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(1): 46-54.
[2]	苏成鹏, 何莹, 宋晓波, 董波, 吴小奇. 四川盆地川西气田中三叠统雷口坡组气藏气源再认识[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(2): 341-352.
[3]	吴小奇, 陈迎宾, 翟常博, 周凌方, 周小进, 杨俊, 王彦青, 宋晓波. 川西坳陷中三叠统雷口坡组沥青地球化学特征及气源示踪[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(2): 407-418.
[4]	龚德瑜, 赵长永, 何文军, 赵龙, 孔玉梅, 马丽亚, 王瑞菊, 吴卫安. 准噶尔盆地西北缘天然气成因来源及勘探潜力[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(1): 161-174.
[5]	李二庭, 靳军, 王剑, 马万云, 陈世加, 刘翠敏, 王海静. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷周缘中、浅层天然气地球化学特征及成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(1): 175-185.
[6]	董庆民, 胡忠贵, 陈世悦, 李世临, 蔡家兰, 朱宜新, 张玉颖. 川东北地区长兴组-飞仙关组碳酸盐岩同位素地球化学响应及其地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(6): 1307-1320.
[7]	李平平, 王淳, 邹华耀, 余新亚. 团簇同位素在白云岩化流体恢复中的应用与局限性[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 738-746.
[8]	何大祥, 唐友军, 胡锦杰, 莫少武, 陈践发. 塔里木盆地天然气中稀有气体地球化学特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 755-762.
[9]	胡安平, 沈安江, 梁峰, 赵建新, 罗宪婴, 俸月星, 程婷. 激光铀铅同位素定年技术在塔里木盆地肖尔布拉克组储层孔隙演化研究中的应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(1): 37-49.
[10]	刘嘉庆, 李忠, 颜梦珂, PeterK.Swart, 杨柳, 卢朝进. 塔里木盆地塔中地区下奥陶统白云岩的成岩流体演化:来自团簇同位素的证据[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(1): 68-82.
[11]	万友利, 王剑, 付修根, 王东. 羌塘盆地南坳陷中侏罗统布曲组白云岩储层成因流体同位素地球化学示踪[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(1): 189-200.
[12]	罗胜元, 陈孝红, 刘安, 李海. 中扬子宜昌地区下寒武统水井沱组页岩气地球化学特征及其成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(5): 999-1010.
[13]	王雨菡, 丁伟铭, 刘璇, 魏韧, 董琳. 渤海湾盆地渤南洼陷沙河街组三段下亚段岩相特征及有机质富集成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(5): 1106-1114.
[14]	杜红权, 王威, 时志强, 谈健康, 曹环宇, 殷雪峰. 四川盆地东北部马路背地区上三叠统须家河组天然气地球化学特征及气源[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(1): 34-40.
[15]	孙海涛, 张玉银, 柳慧林, 谢瑞, 杨雪琪, 任影. 四川盆地东部下寒武统龙王庙组白云岩类型及其成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(2): 318-329.