致密油藏多级压裂水平裂缝井不稳态产能分析

doi:10.11743/ogg20140117

石油与天然气地质 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 138-142.doi: 10.11743/ogg20140117

致密油藏多级压裂水平裂缝井不稳态产能分析

刘波涛^1,2, 李清泉³, 张福祥⁴, 王新海^1,2,3, 李国亮⁵, 卢冲⁶, 岳海玲⁷, 王钊⁸

1. 长江大学油气资源与勘探技术教育部重点实验室, 湖北武汉 430100;
2. 长江大学计算机科学学院, 湖北荆州 434023;
3. 中国石油大学石油工程教育部重点实验室, 北京昌平 102249;
4. 中国石油塔里木油田分公司, 新疆库尔勒 841000;
5. 中国石油西部钻探工程有限公司试油公司, 新疆克拉玛依 834027;
6. 中国石油青海油田分公司采油一厂, 青海茫崖 816499;
7. 中国石油长城钻探工程有限公司地质研究院, 辽宁盘锦 124010;
8. 中国石油伊拉克公司, 北京 100724

收稿日期:2013-10-08 修回日期:2014-01-06 出版日期:2014-02-08 发布日期:2014-03-26
作者简介:刘波涛（1980—），男，博士研究生、讲师，非常规油气开发。E-mail：liubotao920@163.com。
基金资助:
“十二五”国家油气重大专项（2011ZX05015-002）；国家科技重大专项（2012E-34-14）；油气资源与勘探技术教育部重点实验室（长江大学）开放基金资助项目（K2013-27）。

Rate transient analysis of multistage fractured wells with horizontal fractures in tight oil reservoirs

Liu Botao^1,2, Li Qingquan³, Zhang Fuxiang⁴, Wang Xinhai^1,2,3, Li Guoliang⁵, Lu Chong⁶, Yue Hailing⁷, Wang Zhao⁸

1. Key Laboratory of Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas Resources of Ministry of Education, Yangtze University, WuHan, Hubei 430100, China;
2. School of Computer Science, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei 434023, China;
3. Key Laboratory for Petroleum Engineering of Ministry of Education, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
4. PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla, Xinjiang 841000, China;
5. Testing Oil Company, PetroChina Western Drilling Engineering Company Limited, Karamay, Xinjiang 834027, China;
6. The 1st Oil Production Plant, PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Company, Mangya, Qinghai 816499, China;
7. Geology Research Institute, PetroChina Changcheng Drilling Engineering Company Limited, Panjin, Liaoning 124010, China;
8. PetroChina Iraqi Corporation, Beijing 100724, China

Received:2013-10-08 Revised:2014-01-06 Online:2014-02-08 Published:2014-03-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 新疆准噶尔盆地克拉玛依油田吉木萨尔（JMSE）凹陷二叠系芦草沟组（P₂l）是致密油储层主要层位。为提高单井产能，目前多采用多级分段压裂技术。以往对于水力压裂的研究多集中于压裂缝为垂直裂缝的情况，但目前已认识的垂直裂缝模型不能解释该区块实际资料，且通过理论及实验研究表明，由于天然裂缝方位与地应力的匹配关系，该区块在实际压裂过程中易产生水平裂缝。因此，目前的研究导致该储层在实施压裂生产而形成水平裂缝时缺乏理论指导。文中基于质量守恒定律，在同时考虑启动压力梯度、压力敏感性及有限导流压裂缝的情况下，建立了双孔单渗油藏中多级压裂水平裂缝井的无因次数学模型，采用隐式差分法和共轭梯度算法对无因次模型进行求解。通过数值模拟的方法依次研究了启动压力梯度、地层非均质系数、窜流系数、压力敏感系数、压裂缝导流能力、压裂缝条数对不稳态产能的影响。研究结果表明，裂缝参数及地层参数均对产能曲线有影响，故而在优选该类油藏的压裂方案时不仅要考虑裂缝参数，还要考虑到在地层压力降落时地层参数所带来的影响。

关键词: 启动压力梯度, 双孔介质, 多级压裂, 水平裂缝, 产能分析, 致密油藏

Abstract: Permian Lucaogou Formation(P₂l)in Jimusaer(JMSE)sag of Karamay oilfield is a typical representative of tight oil reservoirs in Junggar Basin.Staged fracturing technology is commonly used to improve the productivity of single well.While previous researches were more concentrated on the cases of vertical fractures,the vertical fracture model could not explain the actual data in the blocks.At the same time,the theoretical and experimental studies show that horizontal cracks are easy to form during the process of fracturing according to the matching relationship between natural fracture azimuth and geostress.Therefore there is a lack of theoretical guidance in study area.Based on the law of conservation of mass and considerations of starting pressure gradient,pressure sensitivity and finite conductivity fractures,a dimensionless mathematical model has been set up to study the flow in the multistage horizontal fracturing fractured well in dual porosity and single permeability reservoir in this paper.And numerical solutions of the model are obtained by using implicit diffe-rence method and conjugate gradient algorithms.The effects on unsteady productivity of starting pressure gradient,formation heterogeneity coefficient,interporosity flow coefficient,pressure sensitive coefficient,conductivity and the number of cracks are studied through numerical simulation in turn.Research results show that the fracture parameters and formation parameters affect the productivity curves.So it is necessary to consider both fracture parameters and the pressure decline reasonably,as choosing an appropriate fracturing scheme to obtain maximum productivity.

Key words: starting pressure gradient, double porosity media, multistage fractured, horizontal fracture, productivity analysis, tight oil reservoir

中图分类号:

TE348

刘波涛,李清泉,张福祥,等. 致密油藏多级压裂水平裂缝井不稳态产能分析[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(1): 138-142. doi: 10.11743/ogg20140117 Liu Botao,Li Qingquan,Zhang Fuxiang,et al. Rate transient analysis of multistage fractured wells with horizontal fractures in tight oil reservoirs[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35(1): 138-142. doi: 10.11743/ogg20140117

参考文献

[1] Hartsock J H,Warren J E.The effect of horizontal hydraulic fracturing on well performance[J].SPE 61,1961:1050-1056.
[2] Gringarten A C,Ramey H J.Unsready-state pressure distributions created by a well with a single horizontal fracture,partial penetration,or restricted entry[J].SPE 3819,1974:413-426.
[3] Sung W,Ertkein T.Performance comparison of vertical and horizontal hydraulic fractures and horizontal boreholes in low permezbility reservoirs:a numerieal study[J].SPE 87,1987:185-193.
[4] Tovar F D,Lee K J.Horizontal hydraulic fracture design for optimal well productivity in anisotropic reservoirs with different aspect ratios[J].SPE 2061,2013:1490-1499.
[5] Yuan R,Jin Liang.Vertical or horizontal?—hydraulic fracture geometry as a make or break to a tight gas field in the Western Sichuan Basin[J].SPE 1213,2013:1-17.
[6] Maxwell S C,Zimmer U.Evidence of horizontal hydraulic fracture at depth due to stress rotations across a thrust fault[J].SPE 458,2007:1-8.
[7] Wright C A,Davis E J.Horizontal hydraulic fractures:oddball occurrences or practical engineering concern?[J].SPE 1142,1997:1-14.
[8] 衣同春.考虑地层污染时水平裂缝压裂产率比的计算[J].石油学报,1988,9(2):77-83. Yi Tongchun.Calculation of the productivity ratio for horizontally fractured wells with formations damage[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,1988,9(2):77-83.
[9] 王鸿勋.水力压裂原理[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1987. Wang Hongxun.Hydraulic fracturing principle[M].Beijing:petro-leum Industry Press,1987
[10] 胥元刚,张琪.变裂缝导流能力下水力压裂整体优化设计方法[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2000,19(2):40-42. Xu Yuangang,Zhang Qi.Overall optimizing designation method for hydraulic fracturing under variable fracture diverting capacity[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2000,19(2):40-42.
[11] 张公社,汤广才,万小勇,等.水力压裂水平裂缝井产能预测新方法[J].石油天然气学报,2009,31(1):121-123. Zhang Gongshe ,Tang Guangcai ,Wang Xiaoyong,et al.A new productive prediction method of horizontal fracture wells in hydraulic fracturing[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2009,31(1):121-123.
[12] 任岚,赵金洲,胡永全,等.水平裂缝井压后产量影响因素分析[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2010,32(4):77-81. Ren Lan,Zhao Jinzhou,Hu Yongquan,et al.Affecting factor analysis of productivity for horizontally fractured wells[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition),2010,32(4):77-81.
[13] Dominique Bourdet.现代试井解释模型及应用[M].张义堂,译.北京:石油工业出版社,2007:102-103. Dominique Bourdet.Modern well testing interpretation model and application[M].Zhang Yitang translated.Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2007:102-103.
[14] 张冬丽.煤层气定向羽状水平井开采数值模拟方法研究[D].河北廊坊:中国科学院渗流流体力学研究所,2004. Zhang Dongli.Numerical simulation method of Coalbed methane(CBM)with pinniform horizontal wells[D].Langfang:The Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute of Seepage Fluid Mechanics,2004.
[15] 徐士良.数值分析与算法[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2007:68-71. Xu Shiliang.Numerical analysis and algorithm[M].Beijing:Mecha-nical Industry Press,2007:68-71.

致密油藏多级压裂水平裂缝井不稳态产能分析

Rate transient analysis of multistage fractured wells with horizontal fractures in tight oil reservoirs

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李剑, 曾联波, 林煜, 刘国平, 曹东升, 王兆生. 柴达木盆地西部新生界水平裂缝及其构造意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1222-1232.
[2]	何发岐, 梁承春, 陆骋, 袁春艳, 黎小伟. 鄂尔多斯盆地南缘过渡带致密-低渗油藏断缝体的识别与描述[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 710-718.
[3]	蒲军, 秦学杰, 苟斐斐, 方文超. 低渗透油藏中不同压裂注采井网非稳态产量计算分析[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(4): 823-832,838.
[4]	朱维耀, 田巍, 朱华银, 宋智勇, 孙岩. 一种测试油气藏岩石启动压力梯度的优化方法[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(1): 175-180,196.
[5]	高大鹏, 叶继根, 李奇, 石成方, 胡云鹏, 侯绍继, 纪淑红, 黄磊. 大庆长垣特高含水期表外储层独立开发方法[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(1): 181-188.
[6]	任晓霞, 李爱芬, 王永政, 吴松涛, 王桂娟. 致密砂岩储层孔隙结构及其对渗流的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地马岭油田长8储层为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(5): 774-779.
[7]	田选华, 陆正元, 胡罡, 刘维霞. 水驱油田合理注采压力系统[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(1): 142-147,153.
[8]	韩永林, 刘军锋, 余永进, 王胜华, 沈强. 致密油藏储层驱替特征及开发效果——以鄂尔多斯盆地上里塬地区延长组长7油层组为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(2): 207-211.
[9]	王子强, 张代燕, 杨军, 寇根, 杨飞. 普通稠油油藏渗流特征实验研究——以新疆油田九₄区齐古组油藏为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2012, 33(2): 302-306.
[10]	宫清顺，倪国辉，芦淑萍，丁梁波，辛勇光. 准噶尔盆地乌尔禾油田凝灰质岩成因及储层特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31(4): 481-485.
[11]	许进进, 徐旭辉, 凡哲元, 胡建国, 宋艳波, 郭鸣黎, 王树平. 考虑启动压力梯度下的火山岩气藏数值模拟研究[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31(2): 240-243+259.
[12]	袁迎中, 张烈辉, 王健, 普艳伟. 非线性渗流地层水平气井二项式产能方程[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2009, 30(1): 122-126.
[13]	郭肖, 伍勇. 启动压力梯度和应力敏感效应对低渗透气藏水平井产能的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2007, 28(4): 539-543.
[14]	王文环. 提高薄互层低渗透砂岩油藏采收率的有效开发技术[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2006, 27(5): 660-667,674.
[15]	王昔彬, 刘传喜, 郑荣臣. 大牛地致密低渗透气藏启动压力梯度及应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2005, 26(5): 698-702.