石油与天然气地质 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1453-1467.doi: 10.11743/ogg20230610
李志明1,2,3(), 刘雅慧1,2,3, 何晋译1,2,3, 孙中良1,2,3, 冷筠滢1,2,3, 李楚雄1,2,3, 贾梦瑶1,2,3, 徐二社1,2,3, 刘鹏1,2,3, 黎茂稳1,2,3, 曹婷婷1,2,3, 钱门辉1,2,3, 朱峰1,2,3
收稿日期:
2023-05-29
修回日期:
2023-08-24
出版日期:
2023-12-01
发布日期:
2023-12-20
第一作者简介:
李志明(1968—),男,研究员,油气地球化学、页岩油气地质。E-mail: 基金项目:
Zhiming LI1,2,3(), Yahui LIU1,2,3, Jinyi HE1,2,3, Zhongliang SUN1,2,3, Junying LENG1,2,3, Chuxiong LI1,2,3, Mengyao JIA1,2,3, Ershe XU1,2,3, Peng LIU1,2,3, Maowen LI1,2,3, Tingting CAO1,2,3, Menhui QIAN1,2,3, Feng ZHU1,2,3
Received:
2023-05-29
Revised:
2023-08-24
Online:
2023-12-01
Published:
2023-12-20
摘要:
合理确定陆相页岩油“甜点”段评价关键参数的界限,是实现经济效益开发的关键。根据陆相页岩油探井现场观测与室内分析、综合前人研究成果与勘探开发实践成效,系统研究了不同类型页岩油“甜点”段TOC(总有机碳含量)、Ro(镜质体反射率)、S1(游离烃含量)、孔隙度、渗透率、OSI(含油饱和度指数)以及脆性矿物含量等关键参数的界限。研究表明:①源-储一体的混积型和页岩型页岩油“甜点”段TOC最低门限应大于1.0 %或2.0 %,最高门限值不宜超过6.0 %。②盐水-咸水、咸化-半咸水和微咸水-淡水湖盆地烃源层系页岩油“甜点”段Ro最低门限分别为0.50 %,0.60 %和0.80 %。③S1受分析样品处置方式等因素影响,建议“甜点”层段TOC下限取1.0 %时,“甜点”段常规热解S1和密闭冷冻碎样热解S1下限分别取1.0 mg/g和2.0 mg/g。当“甜点”层段TOC下限取2.0 %时,“甜点”段常规热解S1和密闭冷冻碎样热解S1下限分别取2.0 mg/g和4.0 mg/g。④夹层型页岩油“甜点”段的孔隙度和渗透率最低门限分别为5.0 %和0.01×10-3 μm2。纹层状、层状构造及裂缝发育的页岩型和混积型页岩油“甜点”段孔隙度和水平渗透率最低门限分别为4.0 %和0.01×10-3 μm2。⑤页岩型和混积型页岩油“甜点”段,OSI取值下限为100 mg/g或200 mg/g。夹层型页岩油“甜点”段,OSI取值下限为300 mg/g或400 mg/g。⑥页岩油“甜点”段脆性矿物含量下限为65.0 %。研究结果可为低油价时期页岩油勘探开发聚焦到真正的页岩油“甜点”段并实现规模效益开发奠定基础。
中图分类号:
表1
中国主要陆相页岩油“甜点”段成熟度(镜质体反射率Ro)最低界限值统计"
盆地 | 富有机质层系 | Ro下限/% | 沉积环境 | 资料来源 |
---|---|---|---|---|
洛杉矶盆地 | 蒙特利组 | 0.50 | 海相 | [ |
威利斯顿盆地 | 巴肯组 | 0.80 | 海相 | [ |
墨西哥湾盆地 | 鹰滩组 | >1.00或>0.85 | 海相 | [ |
松辽盆地 | 青山口组一段 | >0.90 | 微咸水-淡水 | [ |
松辽盆地 | 青山口组一段 | 0.80 | 微咸水-淡水 | [ |
松辽盆地 | 青一段、青二段 | >0.75 | 微咸水-淡水 | [ |
鄂尔多斯盆地 | 延长组7段 | 0.80 | 微咸水-淡水 | [ |
四川盆地 | 大安寨段 | >1.00 | 微咸水-淡水 | [ |
准噶尔盆地 | 芦草沟组 | 0.80 | 咸水-半咸水 | [ |
渤海湾盆地 | 沙四上亚段、沙三下亚段 | >0.60 | 咸水-半咸水 | [ |
渤海湾盆地 | 沙四上亚段、沙三下亚段 | >0.55 | 咸水-半咸水 | [ |
渤海湾盆地 | 孔店组二段 | >0.70 | 咸水-半咸水 | [ |
渤海湾盆地 | 沙河街组一段 | 0.80 | 咸水-半咸水 | [ |
苏北盆地 | 阜宁组二段 | >0.90 | 咸水-半咸水 | [ |
江汉盆地 | 潜江组三段 | >0.50 | 盐水-咸水 | [ |
表2
中国主要陆相页岩油“甜点”段游离烃含量(S1)平均值门限统计"
盆地 | 烃源层系 | S1平均值下限/(mg/g) | 资源来源 | 备注 |
---|---|---|---|---|
松辽盆地 | 青山口组一段 | Ⅰ类甜点:>6.0;Ⅱ类甜点:5.0 | [ | 根据保压取心结果对常规热解 分析结果进行了校正 |
松辽盆地 | 青山口组一段 | 2.0 | [ | 常规热解 |
鄂尔多斯盆地 | 延长组7段 | 2.0 | [ | 常规热解 |
准噶尔盆地 | 芦草沟组 | 4.0 | [ | 常规热解,夹层型 |
渤海湾盆地 | 沙四上亚段、沙三下亚段 | 2.0 | [ | 常规热解 |
渤海湾盆地 | 沙三下亚段 | 4.0 | 本文 | 冷冻密闭碎样热解 |
渤海湾盆地 | 沙四上亚段、沙三下亚段 | 2.0 | [ | 室温放置2年以上,常规热解 |
渤海湾盆地 | 孔店组二段 | Ⅰ类甜点:≥2.0;Ⅱ类甜点:1.5 | [ | 常规热解 |
渤海湾盆地 | 孔店组二段 | Ⅰ类甜点:≥4.0;Ⅱ类甜点:3.0 | [ | 常规热解+轻烃恢复校正 |
渤海湾盆地 | 沙河街组一段 | Ⅰ类甜点:≥6.0;Ⅱ类甜点:4.5 | [ | 常规热解+轻烃恢复校正 |
苏北盆地 | 阜宁组二段 | 3.0 | 本文 | 冷冻密闭碎样热解 |
苏北盆地 | 阜宁组二段 | Ⅰ类甜点:>1.4; Ⅱ类甜点:1.2;Ⅲ类甜点:<1.0 | [ | 常规热解 |
江汉盆地 | 潜江组三段 | 3.5 | [ | 常规热解 |
1 | 邹才能, 杨智, 王红岩, 等. “进源找油”: 论四川盆地非常规陆相大型页岩油气田[J]. 地质学报, 2019, 93(7): 1551-1562. |
ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, WANG Hongyan, et al. “Exploring petroleum inside source kitchen”: Jurassic unconventional continental giant shale oil & gas field in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2019, 93(7): 1551-1562. | |
2 | 黎茂稳, 马晓潇, 金之钧, 等. 中国海、陆相页岩层系岩相组合多样性与非常规油气勘探意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(1): 1-25. |
LI Maowen, MA Xiaoxiao, JIN Zhijun, et al. Diversity in the lithofacies assemblages of marine and lacustrine shale strata and significance for unconventional petroleum exploration in China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(1): 1-25. | |
3 | 朱国文, 王小军, 张金友, 等. 松辽盆地陆相页岩油富集条件及勘探开发有利区[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 110-124. |
ZHU Guowen, WANG Xiaojun, ZHANG Jinyou, et al. Enrichment conditions and favorable zones for exploration and development of continental shale oil in Songliao Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(1): 110-124. | |
4 | 赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 等. 断陷湖盆湖相页岩油形成有利条件及富集特征——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(9): 1013-1029. |
ZHAO Xianzheng, ZHOU Lihong, PU Xiugang, et al. Favorable formation conditions and enrichment characteristics of lacustrine facies shale oil in faulted lake basin: A case study of member 2 of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(9): 1013-1029. | |
5 | 邹才能, 杨智, 崔景伟, 等. 页岩油形成机制、地质特征及发展对策[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(1): 14-26. |
ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, CUI Jingwei, et al. Formation mechanism, geological characteristics and development strategy of nonmarine shale oil in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(1): 14-26. | |
6 | 支东明, 唐勇, 杨智峰, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷陆相页岩油地质特征与聚集机理[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 524-534. |
ZHI Dongming, TANG Yong, YANG Zhifeng, et al. Geological characteristics and accumulation mechanism of continental shale oil in Jimusaer Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3): 524-534. | |
7 | 付金华, 李士祥, 牛小兵, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系长7段页岩油地质特征与勘探实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(5): 870-883. |
FU Jinhua, LI Shixiang, NIU Xiaobing, et al. Geological characteristics and exploration of shale oil in Chang 7 Member of Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(5): 870-883. | |
8 | 付锁堂, 金之钧, 付金华, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段从致密油到页岩油认识的转变及勘探开发意义[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(5): 561-569. |
FU Suotang, JIN Zhijun, FU Jinhua, et al. Transformation of understanding from tight oil to shale oil in the Member 7 of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin and its significance of exploration and development[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(5): 561-569. | |
9 | 李志明, 陶国亮, 黎茂稳, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部彬长区块三叠系延长组7段3亚段页岩油勘探前景探讨[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 558-570. |
LI Zhiming, TAO Guoliang, LI Maowen, et al. Discussion on prospecting potential of shale oil in the 3rd sub-member of the Triassic Chang 7 member in Binchang Block, southwestern Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3): 558-570. | |
10 | 刘惠民, 杨怀宇, 张鹏飞, 等. 古湖泊水介质条件对混积岩相组合沉积的控制作用——以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷古近系沙河街组三段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(2): 297-306. |
LIU Huimin, YANG Huaiyu, ZHANG Pengfei, et al. Control effect of paleolacustrine water conditions on mixed lithofacies assemblages: A case study of the Palaeogene Es3, Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(2): 297-306. | |
11 | 马克, 侯加根, 董虎, 等. 页岩油储层混合细粒沉积孔喉特征及其对物性的控制作用——以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(5): 1194-1205. |
MA Ke, HOU Jiagen, DONG Hu, et al. Pore throat characteristics of fine-grained mixed deposits in shale oil reservoirs and their control on reservoir physical properties: A case study of the Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(5): 1194-1205. | |
12 | 赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 等. 断陷湖盆湖相页岩油形成有利条件及富集特征——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(9): 1013-1029. |
ZHAO Xianzheng, ZHOU Lihong, PU Xiugang, et al. Favorable formation conditions and enrichment characteristics of lacustrine facies shale oil in faulted lake basin: A case study of member 2 of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(9): 1013-1029. | |
13 | 刘惠民, 于炳松, 谢忠怀, 等. 陆相湖盆富有机质页岩微相特征及对页岩油富集的指示意义——以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷为例[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(12): 1328-1343. |
LIU Huimin, YU Bingsong, XIE Zhonghuai, et al. Characteristics and implications of micro-lithofacies in lacustrine-basin organic-rich shale: A case study of Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(12): 1328-1343. | |
14 | 蒲秀刚, 金凤鸣, 韩文中, 等. 陆相页岩油甜点地质特征与勘探关键技术——以沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(8): 997-1012. |
PU Xiugang, JIN Fengming, HAN Wenzhong, et al. Sweet spots geological characteristics and key exploration technologies of continental shale oil: A case study of member 2 of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong Sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(8): 997-1012. | |
15 | 焦方正, 邹才能, 杨智. 陆相源内石油聚集地质理论认识及勘探开发实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(6): 1067-1078. |
JIAO Fangzheng, ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi. Geological theory and exploration & development practice of hydrocarbon accumulation inside continental source kitchens[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(6): 1067-1078. | |
16 | 蔚远江, 王红岩, 刘德勋, 等. 中国陆相页岩油示范区发展现状及建设可行性评价指标体系[J]. 地球科学, 2023, 48(1): 191-205. |
YU Yuanjiang, WANG Hongyan, LIU Dexun, et al. Development status and feasibility evaluation index system of continental shale oil demonstration area in China[J]. Earth Science, 2023, 48(1): 191-205. | |
17 | 中华人民共和国国家市场监督管理总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 页岩油地质评价方法: [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2020. |
State Administration for Market Regulation, Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Geological evaluating methods for shale oil: [S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2020. | |
18 | 金之钧, 王冠平, 刘光祥, 等. 中国陆相页岩油研究进展与关键科学问题[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(7): 821-835. |
JIN Zhijun, WANG Guanping, LIU Guangxiang, et al. Research progress and key scientific issues of continental shale oil in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(7): 821-835. | |
19 | 孙龙德, 赵文智, 刘合, 等. 页岩油 “甜点” 概念及其应用讨论[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 1-13. |
SUN Longde, ZHAO Wenzhi, LIU He, et al. Concept and application of “sweet spot” in shale oil[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(1): 1-13. | |
20 | 印森林, 陈恭洋, 许长福, 等. 陆相混积细粒储集岩岩相构型及其对甜点的控制作用——以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(5): 1180-1193. |
YIN Senlin, CHEN Gongyang, XU Changfu, et al. Lithofacies architecture of lacustrine fine-grained mixed reservoirs and its control over sweet spot: A case study of Permian Lucaogou Formation shale oil reservoir in the Jimsar Sag, Juggar Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(5): 1180-1193. | |
21 | 韩文中, 赵贤正, 金凤鸣, 等. 渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段湖相页岩油甜点评价与勘探实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(4): 777-786. |
HAN Wenzhong, ZHAO Xianzheng, JIN Fengming, et al. Sweet spots evaluation and exploration of lacustrine shale oil of the second member of Paleogene Kongdian Formation in Cangdong Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(4): 777-786. | |
22 | 张鹏飞, 卢双舫, 李俊乾, 等. 湖相页岩油有利甜点区优选方法及应用——以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷沙河街组为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(6): 1339-1350. |
ZHANG Pengfei, LU Shuangfang, LI Junqian, et al. Identification method of sweet spot zone in lacustrine shale oil reservoir and its application: A case study of the Shahejie Formation in Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(6): 1339-1350. | |
23 | 杨智, 唐振兴, 李国会, 等. 陆相页岩层系石油富集区带优选、甜点区段评价与关键技术应用[J]. 地质学报, 2021, 95(8): 2257-2272. |
YANG Zhi, TANG Zhenxing, LI Guohui, et al. Optimization of enrichmentplays, evaluation of sweet area & section and application of key technologies for the continental shale strata oil in China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2021, 95(8): 2257-2272. | |
24 | 金之钧, 白振瑞, 高波, 等. 中国迎来页岩油气革命了吗?[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 451-458. |
JIN Zhijun, BAI Zhenrui, GAO Bo, et al. Has China ushered in the shale oil and gas revolution?[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3): 451-458. | |
25 | 万晓帆, 刘丛丛, 赵德锋, 等. 页岩油研究热点与发展趋势[J]. 地球科学, 2023, 48(2): 793-813. |
WAN Xiaofan, LIU Congcong, ZHAO Defeng, et al. Hotspot and development trend of shale oil research[J]. Earth Science, 2023, 48(2): 793-813. | |
26 | 李志明, 孙中良, 黎茂稳, 等. 济阳坳陷第一轮页岩油探井 “失利” 原因剖析[J]. 地球科学, 2023, 48(1): 143-157. |
LI Zhiming, SUN Zhongliang, LI Maowen, et al. Cause analyses of “failure” for first round shale oil exploration wells in Jiyang Depression[J]. Earth Science, 2023, 48(1): 143-157. | |
27 | 胡素云, 白斌, 陶士振, 等. 中国陆相中高成熟度页岩油非均质地质条件与差异富集特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2022, 49(2): 224-237. |
HU Suyun, BAI Bin, TAO Shizhen, et al. Heterogeneous geological conditions and differential enrichment of medium and high maturity continental shale oil in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(2): 224-237. | |
28 | 赵文智, 朱如凯, 刘伟, 等. 我国陆相中高熟页岩油富集条件与分布特征[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(1): 116-127. |
ZHAO Wenzhi, ZHU Rukai, LIU Wei, et al. Lacustrine medium-high maturity shale oil in onshore China: Enrichment conditions and occurrence features[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(1): 116-127. | |
29 | 王勇, 刘惠民, 宋国奇, 等. 济阳坳陷页岩油富集要素与富集模式研究[J]. 高校地质学报, 2017, 23(2): 268-276. |
WANG Yong, LIU Huimin, SONG Guoqi, et al. Enrichment controls and models of shale oil in the Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2017, 23(2): 268-276. | |
30 | 李志明, 钱门辉, 黎茂稳, 等. 盐间页岩油形成有利条件与地质甜点评价关键参数——以潜江凹陷潜江组潜34-10韵律为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(4): 513-523. |
LI Zhiming, QIAN Menhui, LI Maowen, et al. Favorable conditions of inter-salt shale oil formation and key parameters for geological sweet spots evaluation: A case study of Eq3 4-10 rhythm of Qianjiang Formation in Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2020, 42(4): 513-523. | |
31 | 李国欣, 朱如凯, 张永庶, 等. 柴达木盆地英雄岭页岩油地质特征、评价标准及发现意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2022, 49(1): 18-31. |
LI Guoxin, ZHU Rukai, ZHANG Yongshu, et al. Geological characteristics, evaluation criteria and discovery significance of Paleogene Yingxiongling shale oil in Qaidam Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(1): 18-31. | |
32 | 云露, 何希鹏, 花彩霞, 等. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系陆相页岩油成藏地质特征及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 176-187. |
YUN Lu, HE Xipeng, HUA Caixia, et al. Accumulation characteristics and resource potential of Paleogene continental shale oil in Qintong Sag of Subei Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(1): 176-187. | |
33 | 杨智, 侯连华, 陶士振, 等. 致密油与页岩油形成条件与 “甜点区” 评价[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(5): 555-565. |
YANG Zhi, HOU Lianhua, TAO Shizhen, et al. Formation conditions and “sweet spot” evaluation of tight oil and shale oil[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(5): 555-565. | |
34 | 李志明, 孙中良, 黎茂稳, 等. 陆相基质型页岩油甜点区成熟度界限探讨——以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷沙三下—沙四上亚段为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(5): 767-775. |
LI Zhiming, SUN Zhongliang, LI Maowen, et al. Maturity limit of sweet spot area for continental matrix type shale oil: A case study of lower Es3 and upper Es4 sub-members in Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2021, 43(5): 767-775. | |
35 | JARVIE D M. Shale resource systems for oil and gas: Part 2—shale-oil resource systems[M]//BREYER J A. Shale Reservoirs—Giant Resources for the 21st Century. Tulsa: American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 2012: 89-119. |
36 | 刘惠民, 李军亮, 刘鹏, 等. 济阳坳陷古近系页岩油富集条件与勘探战略方向[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(12): 1717-1729. |
LIU Huimin, LI Junliang, LIU Peng, et al. Enrichment conditions and strategic exploration direction of Paleogene shale oil in Jiyang Depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(12): 1717-1729. | |
37 | 赵贤正, 金凤鸣, 周立宏, 等. 渤海湾盆地风险探井歧页1H井沙河街组一段页岩油勘探突破及其意义[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(10): 1369-1382. |
ZHAO Xianzheng, JIN Fengming, ZHOU Lihong, et al. Breakthrough and significance of shale oil exploration in Member 1 of Shahejie Formation of Well Qiye 1H, a risk exploratory well in Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(10): 1369-1382. | |
38 | 管文静. 潜江凹陷盐间页岩油 “甜点” 评价标准研究[J]. 江汉石油职工大学学报, 2020, 33(3): 15-17. |
GUAN Wenjing. Study on evaluation criterion of “sweet spot” of inter-salt shale oil in Qianjiang Depression[J]. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum University of Staff and Workers, 2020, 33(3): 15-17. | |
39 | 马中良, 郑伦举, 李志明, 等. 盐类物质对泥质烃源岩生排烃过程的影响[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 35(1): 43-51. |
MA Zhongliang, ZHENG Lunju, LI Zhiming, et al. The effect of salts on hydrocarbon generation and expulsion of argillaceous source rock[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2013, 35(1): 43-51. | |
40 | 李志明, 郑伦举, 蒋启贵, 等. 湖相富有机质泥质白云岩生排烃模拟及其对页岩油勘探的启示[J]. 地球科学, 2018, 43(2): 566-576. |
LI Zhiming, ZHENG Lunju, JIANG Qigui, et al. Simulation of hydrocarbon generation and expulsion for lacustrine organic-rich argillaceous dolomite and its implications for shale oil exploration[J]. Earth Science, 2018, 43(2): 566-576. | |
41 | 王强, 彭平安, 张文正, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段页岩全组分定量生烃模拟及原油可动性评价[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(5): 541-553. |
WANG Qiang, PENG Ping’an, ZHANG Wenzheng, et al. Quantitative full-component hydrocarbon-generating simulation and crude oil mobility evaluation of shale in 7th Member of Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(5): 541-553. | |
42 | 李志明, 徐二社, 秦建中, 等. 烃源岩评价中的若干问题[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 25(6): 8-12, 27. |
LI Zhiming, XU Ershe, QIN Jianzhong, et al. Some problems on the evaluation of source rock[J]. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2010, 25(6): 8-12, 27. | |
43 | 李志明, 秦建中, 徐旭辉, 等. 镜质体反射率抑制与烃源岩质量关系——以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷烃源岩为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2008, 30(3): 276-280. |
LI Zhiming, QIN Jianzhong, XU Xuhui, et al. The relationship between vitrinite reflectance suppression and source rock quality——A case study on source rocks from the Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2008, 30(3): 276-280. | |
44 | LO H B. Correction criteria for the suppression of vitrinite reflectance in hydrogen-rich kerogens: Preliminary guidelines[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 1993, 20(6): 653-657. |
45 | 李志明, 陶国亮, 黎茂稳, 等. 渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷沾化凹陷L69井古近系沙三下亚段取心段页岩油勘探有利层段[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(2): 236-247. |
LI Zhiming, TAO Guoliang, LI Maowen, et al. Favorable interval for shale oil prospecting in coring Well L69 in the Paleogene Es3L in Zhanhua Sag, Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(2): 236-247. | |
46 | LARTER S, HUANG Haiping, BENNETT B, et al. What don’t we know about self sourced oil reservoirs: Challenges and potential solutions[C]//SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 2012. Red Hook: Curran Associates, Inc., 2012: SPE-162777-MS. |
47 | 王强, 李志明, 钱门辉, 等. 超临界二氧化碳萃取泥页岩中可动油实验研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(4): 646-652. |
WANG Qiang, LI Zhiming, QIAN Menhui, et al. Movable oil extraction from shale with supercritical carbon dioxide[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2020, 42(4): 646-652. | |
48 | 赵文智, 卞从胜, 李永新, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系长73亚段页岩有机质转化率、排烃效率与页岩油主富集类型[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(1): 12-23. |
ZHAO Wenzhi, BIAN Congsheng, LI Yongxin, et al. Organic matter transformation ratio, hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency and shale oil enrichment type in Chang 73 shale of Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(1): 12-23. | |
49 | 王民, 李明, 李进步, 等. 页岩含油率多种测试方法对比[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(12): 1758-1769. |
WANG Min, LI Ming, LI Jinbu, et al. Comparative analysis of test methods for shale oil content[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(12): 1758-1769. | |
50 | 曹婷婷, 蒋启贵, 钱门辉, 等. 页岩含油量热解分析关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(2): 329-338. |
CAO Tingting, JIANG Qigui, QIAN Menhui, et al. Key technologies for pyrolysis analysis of shale oil content[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(2): 329-338. | |
51 | 金之钧, 张谦, 朱如凯, 等. 中国陆相页岩油分类及其意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 801-819. |
JIN Zhijun, ZHANG Qian, ZHU Rukai, et al. Classification of lacustrine shale oil reservoirs in China and its significance[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(4): 801-819. | |
52 | 蒋启贵, 黎茂稳, 钱门辉, 等. 页岩油探井现场地质评价实验流程与技术进展[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 571-582. |
JIANG Qigui, LI Maowen, QIAN Menhui, et al. Experimental procedures of well-site geological evaluation for shale oil and related technological progress[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3): 571-582. | |
53 | 赵贤正, 周立宏, 赵敏, 等. 陆相页岩油工业化开发突破与实践——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段为例[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5): 589-600. |
ZHAO Xianzheng, ZHOU Lihong, ZHAO Min, et al. Breakthrough and practice of industrial development on continental shale oil: A case study on Kong-2 Member in Cangdong Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5): 589-600. | |
54 | 王茂林, 程鹏, 田辉, 等. 页岩油储层评价指标体系[J]. 地球化学, 2017, 46(2): 178-190. |
WANG Maolin, CHENG Peng, TIAN Hui, et al. Evaluation index system of shale oil reservoirs[J]. Geochimica, 2017, 46(2): 178-190. | |
55 | 周尚文, 董大忠, 张介辉, 等. 页岩气储层孔隙度测试方法关键参数优化[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(5): 20-29. |
ZHOU Shangwen, DONG Dazhong, ZHANG Jiehui, et al. Optimization of key parameters for porosity measurement of shale gas reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(5): 20-29. | |
56 | 田冲, 李怡, 黎丁源, 等. 页岩储层孔隙度测定方法优选与推荐[J]. 天然气工业, 2023, 43(6): 57-65. |
TIAN Chong, LI Yi, LI Dingyuan, et al. Selection and recommendation of shale reservoir porosity measurement methods[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2023, 43(6): 57-65. | |
57 | 付金华, 李士祥, 郭芪恒, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地陆相页岩油富集条件及有利区优选[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(12): 1702-1716. |
FU Jinhua, LI Shixiang, GUO Qiheng, et al. Enrichment conditions and favorable area optimization of continental shale oil in Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(12): 1702-1716. | |
58 | 霍进, 支东明, 郑孟林, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油藏特征与形成主控因素[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(4): 506-512. |
HUO Jin, ZHI Dongming, ZHENG Menglin, et al. Characteristics and main controls of shale oil reservoirs in Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2020, 42(4): 506-512. | |
59 | 郭旭光, 何文军, 杨森, 等. 准噶尔盆地页岩油 “甜点区” 评价与关键技术应用——以吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(8): 1168-1179. |
GUO Xuguang, HE Wenjun, YANG Sen, et al. Evaluation and application of key technologies of “sweet area” of shale oil in Junggar Basin: Case study of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Depression[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(8): 1168-1179. | |
60 | 姜在兴, 张文昭, 梁超, 等. 页岩油储层基本特征及评价要素[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(1): 184-196. |
JIANG Zaixing, ZHANG Wenzhao, LIANG Chao, et al. Characteristics and evaluation elements of shale oil reservoir[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014, 35(1): 184-196. | |
61 | JARVIE D M. Components and processes affecting producibility and commerciality of shale resource systems[J]. Geologica Acta, 2014, 12(4): 307-325. |
62 | 李志明, 芮晓庆, 黎茂稳, 等. 北美典型混合页岩油系统特征及其启示[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(4): 1060-1072. |
LI Zhiming, RUI Xiaoqing, LI Maowen, et al. Characteristics of typical hybrid shale-oil system in North America and its implications[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(4): 1060-1072. | |
63 | 赵贤正, 蒲秀刚, 金凤鸣, 等. 黄骅坳陷页岩型页岩油富集规律及勘探有利区[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 158-175. |
ZHAO Xianzheng, PU Xiugang, JIN Fengming, et al. Enrichment law and favorable exploration area of shale-type shale oil in Huanghua Depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(1): 158-175. | |
64 | 孙焕泉, 蔡勋育, 周德华, 等. 中国石化页岩油勘探实践与展望[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5): 569-575. |
SUN Huanquan, CAI Xunyu, ZHOU Dehua, et al. Practice and prospect of Sinopec shale oil exploration[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5): 569-575. | |
65 | 侯连华, 吴松涛, 姜晓华, 等. 页岩油地质评价实验方法现状、挑战与发展方向[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 72-90. |
HOU Lianhua, WU Songtao, JIANG Xiaohua, et al. Situation, challenge and future direction of experimental methods for geological evaluation of shale oil[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(1): 72-90. | |
66 | 曹茜, 王兴志, 戚明辉, 等. 页岩油地质评价实验测试技术研究进展[J]. 岩矿测试, 2020, 39(3): 337-349. |
CAO Qian, WANG Xingzhi, QI Minghui, et al. Research progress on experimental technologies of shale oil geological evaluation[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2020, 39(3): 337-349. | |
67 | 刘合, 孟思炜, 王素玲, 等. 古龙页岩力学特征与裂缝扩展机理[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 820-828. |
LIU He, MENG Siwei, WANG Suling, et al. Mechanical characteristics and fracture propagation mechanisms of the Gulong shale[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(4): 820-828. | |
68 | 蒋廷学, 卞晓冰, 苏瑗, 等. 页岩可压性指数评价新方法及应用[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2014, 42(5): 16-20. |
JIANG Tingxue, BIAN Xiaobing, SU Yuan, et al. A new method for evaluating shale fracability index and its application[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2014, 42(5): 16-20. | |
69 | 孙龙德, 刘合, 何文渊, 等. 大庆古龙页岩油重大科学问题与研究路径探析[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(3): 453-463. |
SUN Longde, LIU He, HE Wenyuan, et al. An analysis of major scientific problems and research paths of Gulong shale oil in Daqing Oilfield, NE China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(3): 453-463. | |
70 | 赵文智, 朱如凯, 胡素云, 等. 陆相富有机质页岩与泥岩的成藏差异及其在页岩油评价中的意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(6): 1079-1089. |
ZHAO Wenzhi, ZHU Rukai, HU Suyun, et al. Accumulation contribution differences between lacustrine organic-rich shales and mudstones and their significance in shale oil evaluation[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(6): 1079-1089. |
[1] | 刘惠民, 包友书, 黎茂稳, 李政, 吴连波, 朱日房, 王大洋, 王鑫. 页岩油富集可动性地球化学评价参数探讨[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 622-636. |
[2] | 蒲秀刚, 董姜畅, 柴公权, 宋舜尧, 时战楠, 韩文中, 张伟, 解德录. 渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷古近系孔店组二段页岩高丰度有机质富集模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 696-709. |
[3] | 方锐, 蒋裕强, 杨长城, 邓海波, 蒋婵, 洪海涛, 唐松, 谷一凡, 朱讯, 孙莎莎, 蔡光银. 四川盆地侏罗系凉高山组不同岩性组合页岩油赋存状态及可动性[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 752-769. |
[4] | 李军, 邹友龙, 路菁. 陆相页岩油储层可动油含量测井评价方法[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 816-826. |
[5] | 杜晓宇, 金之钧, 曾联波, 刘国平, 杨森, 梁新平, 陆国青. 基于成像测井的深层陆相页岩油储层天然裂缝有效性评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 852-865. |
[6] | 赵喆, 白斌, 刘畅, 王岚, 周海燕, 刘羽汐. 中国石油陆上中-高成熟度页岩油勘探现状、进展与未来思考[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 327-340. |
[7] | 高和群, 高玉巧, 何希鹏, 聂军. 苏北盆地古近系阜宁组二段页岩油储层岩石力学特征及其控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 502-515. |
[8] | 郭旭升, 马晓潇, 黎茂稳, 钱门辉, 胡宗全. 陆相页岩油富集机理探讨[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1333-1349. |
[9] | 孙龙德, 王小军, 冯子辉, 邵红梅, 曾花森, 高波, 江航. 松辽盆地古龙页岩纳米孔缝形成机制与页岩油富集特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1350-1365. |
[10] | 米立军, 徐建永, 李威. 渤海海域页岩油资源潜力[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1366-1377. |
[11] | 胡宗全, 王濡岳, 路菁, 冯动军, 刘粤蛟, 申宝剑, 刘忠宝, 王冠平, 何建华. 陆相页岩及其夹层储集特征对比与差异演化模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1393-1404. |
[12] | 刘惠民, 李政, 包友书, 张守春, 王伟庆, 吴连波, 王勇, 朱日房, 方正伟, 张顺, 刘鹏, 王敏. 渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷高产页岩油井BYP5页岩地质特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1405-1417. |
[13] | 王民, 余昌琦, 费俊胜, 李进步, 张宇辰, 言语, 吴艳, 董尚德, 唐育龙. 页岩油在干酪根中吸附行为的分子动力学模拟与启示[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1442-1452. |
[14] | 方志雄, 肖秋生, 张殿伟, 段宏亮. 苏北盆地陆相“断块型”页岩油地质特征及勘探实践[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1468-1478. |
[15] | 李明, 王民, 张金友, 张宇辰, 刘召, 雒斌, 卞从胜, 李进步, 王鑫, 赵信斌, 董尚德. 中国典型盆地陆相页岩油组分评价及意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1479-1498. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||