构造活动及层序格架约束下的沉积、成岩作用对储层质量的影响——以松辽盆地南部大情字井地区葡萄花油层为例

doi:10.11743/ogg20180207

石油与天然气地质 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 279-290.doi: 10.11743/ogg20180207

构造活动及层序格架约束下的沉积、成岩作用对储层质量的影响——以松辽盆地南部大情字井地区葡萄花油层为例

曹铮¹, 林承焰^1,2, 董春梅^1,2, 任丽华^1,2, 宋雷³, 邢新亚¹, 马晓兰⁴

1. 中国石油大学(华东) 地球科学与技术学院, 山东青岛 266580;
2. 山东省油藏重点实验室, 山东青岛 266580;
3. 中国石油吉林油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 吉林松原 138000;
4. 中国石化胜利油田分公司井下作业公司, 山东东营 257000

收稿日期:2017-07-10 修回日期:2018-01-23 出版日期:2018-04-28 发布日期:2018-05-16
作者简介:曹铮(1987-),男,博士研究生,储层地质学及油藏分布。E-mail:caozheng_upc@126.com。
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项（2011ZX05009-003）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目（15CX06012A）。

Impact of sedimentation and diagenesis upon reservoir quality under constraint of tectonic activities and sequence stratigraphic framework-A case study of Putaohua oil layer in Daqingzijing area of southern Songliao Basin

Cao Zheng¹, Lin Chengyan^1,2, Dong Chunmei^1,2, Ren Lihua^1,2, Song Lei³, Xing Xinya¹, Ma Xiaolan⁴

1. School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum(EastChina), Qingdao, Shandong 266580, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Reservoir Geology, Qingdao, Shangdong 266580, China;
3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development of Jilin Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Songyuan, Jilin 138000, China;
4. Downhole Service, Shengli Oilfield Company, SINOPEC, Dongying, Shandong 257000, China

Received:2017-07-10 Revised:2018-01-23 Online:2018-04-28 Published:2018-05-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用钻测井、岩心、岩石薄片、电镜扫描和室内分析化验等资料，基于层序地层学理论，展开了对松辽盆地南部（松南）大情字井地区葡萄花油层沉积作用、成岩作用和构造活动对储层质量控制作用的研究。结果表明，葡萄花油层层序格架主要由低位体系域和湖侵体系域组成，低位体系域主干分流河道砂岩和岔道口砂岩的储层质量最好，湖侵体系域水下分流河道次之。层序格架约束下的沉积作用控制不同体系域沉积微相的纵横向展布及砂体发育规模差异。垂向上，低位体系域上部砂岩的发育规模大、连通性好，为相对优质储层的发育层段；平面上，主干分流河道砂岩和岔道口砂岩的储层物性相对较好。成岩压实作用是导致葡萄花油层砂岩低渗透化的直接因素，层序格架控制低位体系域砂岩和湖侵体系域砂岩早期成岩环境的差异，导致湖侵体系域砂岩的碳酸盐胶结相对更强。溶蚀作用的强度主要受控于储层物性好坏、油源断裂展布及距油源断裂距离。研究区葡萄花油层的相对优质储层主要受控于层序格架、沉积作用、成岩作用及构造活动4者的耦合作用，即临近油源断裂或被多条油源断裂夹持的低位体系域中上部主干分流河道是相对优质储层发育的主要部位。

关键词: 构造活动, 层序地层学, 储层, 葡萄花油层, 大情字井地区, 松辽盆地

Abstract: The impact of sedimentation,diagenesis and tectonic activities upon reservoir quality in Putaohua oil layer of Daqingzijing area,southern Songliao Basin,was studied based on sequence stratigraphic theories through analyses of drilling and logging data,core and thin section observation,SEM images as well as lab testing results.The result shows that the sequence stratigraphic framework of Putaohua oil layer is mainly composed of a low stand system tract and a lake transgression tract,with the former containing some high-quality sandstone reservoirs in distributary channels and forks of the main stream and the latter with quality sandstone reservoirs in underwater distributary channels.Sedimentation constrained by the framework was found to control the vertical and horizontal distribution of sedimentary microfacies and the scales of sandbodies in these system tracts.Vertically,sandstone layers at the upper part of the low stand system tract are large in scale and good in connectivity,thus contain relatively high-quality reservoirs; and horizontally,reservoir properties of the main distributary channel sandstone and fork sandstone are better for oil and gas accumulation.Diagenesis and compaction were suggested to be the direct reason behind the low-permeability of Putaohua oil layer,while the sequence stratigraphic framework,which controlled an early diagenesis environment in both system tracts,was regarded to be a factor that strengthened to some extent the carbonate cementation of sandstone layers in the lake transgression system tract.The range and extent of dissolution there were thought to be determined by the properties of reservoirs,distribution of source rock-rooted faults and distance to these faults.Relatively high-quality reservoirs in the oil layer were controlled jointly by four factors,namely the sequence stratigraphic framework,sedimentation,diagenesis and tectonic activity,i.e. the main distributary channels at the central and upper part of the low stand system tract that were near to the source rock-rooted faults or bounded by the faults served as the major spots for high-quality reservoirs to take shape.

Key words: tectonic activity, sequence stratigraphy, reservoir, Putaohua oil layer, Daqingzijing area, Songliao Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

曹铮,林承焰,董春梅,等. 构造活动及层序格架约束下的沉积、成岩作用对储层质量的影响——以松辽盆地南部大情字井地区葡萄花油层为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(2): 279-290. doi: 10.11743/ogg20180207 Cao Zheng,Lin Chengyan,Dong Chunmei,et al. Impact of sedimentation and diagenesis upon reservoir quality under constraint of tectonic activities and sequence stratigraphic framework-A case study of Putaohua oil layer in Daqingzijing area of southern Songliao Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(2): 279-290. doi: 10.11743/ogg20180207

参考文献

[1] Amel H,Jafarian A,Husinec A,et al.Microfacies,depositional environment and diagenetic evolution controls on the reservoir quality of the Permian Upper Dalan Formation,Kish Gas Field,Zagros Basin[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2015,67:57-71.
[2] Dutton S P,Loucks R G.Diagenetic controls on evolution of porosity and permeability in lower Tertiary Wilcox sandstones from shallow to ultradeep(200~6700m)burial,Gulf of Mexico Basin,USA[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2010,27(1):69-81.
[3] Lima R D,De Ros L F.The role of depositional setting and diagenesis on the reservoir quality of Devonian sandstones from the Solimoes Basin,Brazilian Amazonia[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2002,19(9):1047-1071.
[4] MORAD S,AL-RAMADAN K,KETZER J M,et al.The impact of diagenesis on the heterogeneity of sandstone reservoirs:A review of the role of depositional facies and sequence stratigraphy[J].AAPGBulletin,2010,94(8):1267-1309.
[5] Amorosi A.Glaucony and sequence stratigraphy:a conceptual framework of distribution in siliciclastic sequences[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,1995,65(4).
[6] Al-Ramadan K,Morad S,Proust J N,et al.Distribution of diagenetic alterations in siliciclastic shoreface deposits within a sequence stratigraphic framework:evidence from the Upper Jurassic,Boulonnais,NW France[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,2005,75(5):943-959.
[7] El-ghali M A K,Mansurbeg H,Morad S,et al.Distribution of diagenetic alterations in fluvial and paralic deposits within sequence stratigraphic framework:evidence from the Petrohan Terrigenous Group and the Svidol Formation,Lower Triassic,NW Bulgaria[J].Sedimentary Geology,2006,190(1):299-321.
[8] El-Ghali M A K,Morad S,Mansurbeg H,et al.Diagenetic alterations related to marine transgression and regression in fluvial and shallow marine sandstones of the Triassic Buntsandstein and Keuper sequence,the Paris Basin,France[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2009,26(3):289-309.
[9] Ketzer J M,Morad S,Evans R,et al.Distribution of diagenetic alterations in fluvial,deltaic,and shallow marine sandstones within a sequence stratigraphic framework:evidence from the Mullaghmore Formation(Carboniferous),NW Ireland[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,2002,72(6):760-774.
[10] Ketzer J M,Morad S.Predictive distribution of shallow marine,low-porosity(pseudomatrix-rich)sandstones in a sequence stratigraphic framework-example from the Ferron sandstone,Upper Cretaceous,USA[J].Marine and petroleum geology,2006,23(1):29-36.
[11] Lan C,Yang M,Zhang Y.Impact of sequence stratigraphy,depositional facies and diagenesis on reservoir quality:A case study on the Pennsylvanian Taiyuan sandstones,northeastern Ordos Basin,China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2016,69:216-230.
[12] 兰朝利,王建国,周晓峰,等.彭阳油田延长组长3段砂岩储层质量控制因素研究[J].岩石学报,2014,21(5):45-48. Lan Chaoli,Wang Jianguo,Zhou Xiaofeng,et al.Im-pacts on sandstone reservoir quality of the Third Member of Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation,Pengyang oilfied of Ordos Basin,China[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2014,21(5):45-48.
[13] 李丹,董春梅,林承焰,等.松南让字井斜坡带源下致密砂岩储集层控制因素[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(6):692-700. Li Dan,Dong Chunmei,Lin Chengyan,et al.Control factors on tight sandstone reservoirs below source rocks in the Rangzijing slope zone of southern Songliao Basin,East China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(6):692-700.
[14] Khalifa M,Morad S.Impact of structural setting on diagenesis of fluvial and tidal sandstones:the Bahi Formation,Upper Cretaceous,NW Sirt Basin,North Central Libya[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2012,38(1):211-231.
[15] 王永春,康伟力,毛超林.吉林探区油气勘探理论与实践[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2007. Wang Yongchun,Kang Weili,Mao Chaolin.The Theory and Practice of Petroleum Exploration in Jilin Exploration Area[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2007.
[16] 林承焰,曹铮,任丽华,等.松辽盆地南部大情字井向斜区葡萄花油层油富集规律及成藏模式[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2016,46(6):1-14. Lin Chengyan,Cao Zheng,Ren Lihua,et al.Oil Enrichment Regularity and Accumulation Modes of Putaohua Reservoir in Daqingzijing Syncline Area,Southern Songliao Basin[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2016,46(6):1-14.
[17] 葛岩,黄志龙,唐振兴,等.松辽盆地南部黑帝庙次凹葡萄花油层油源条件及成藏机理[J].油气地质与采收率,2012,19(3):25-28. Ge Yan,Huang Zhilong,Tang Zhenxing,et al.Study on reservoir-forming mechanism of Putaohua reservoir in Heidimiao secondary depression,Southern Songliao Basin[J].Oil & Gas Recovery Technology,2012,19(3):25-28.
[18] 葛岩,黄志龙,唐振兴,等.长岭凹陷葡萄花油层油源及成藏控制因素分析[J].断块油气田,2013,20(4):409-412. Ge Yan,Huang Zhilong,Tang Zhenxing,et al.Oil source correlation and controlling factor analysis of hydrocarbon accumulation for Putaohua reservoirs in Changling Sag[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2013,20(4):409-412.
[19] 王立武.坳陷湖盆浅水三角洲的沉积特征-以松辽盆地南部姚一段为例[J]].沉积学报,2012,30(6):1053-1059. Wang Liwu.Forming conditions and depositional characteristics of shallow-water deltas in depression basins[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2012,30(6):1053-1059.
[20] 邢新亚,林承焰,王东仁,等.低渗透油藏网状河道岔道口优质储层特征及其控制因素[J].油气地质与采收率,2015,22(3):29-33. Xing Xinya,Lin Chengyan,Wang Dongren,et al.Characteristics and controlling factors of favorable reservoirs in braided channel crotch of low permeability reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2015,22(3):29-33.
[21] 林承焰,余成林,董春梅,等.老油田剩余油分布:水下分流河道岔道剩余油富集[J].石油学报,2011,32(5):829-835. Lin Chengyan,Yu Chenglin,Dong Chunmei,et al.Remaining oils distribution in old oilfields:enrichment of remaining oils in underwater distributary channel crotches[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(5):829-835.
[22] 金振奎,李燕,高白水,等.现代缓坡三角洲沉积模式:以鄱阳湖赣江三角洲为例[J].沉积学报,2014,4(32):710-723. Jin Zhenkui,Li Yan,Gao Baishui,et al.Depositional model of modern gentle slope delta:A case study from Ganjiang Delta in Poyang Lake[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2014,4(32):710-723.
[23] Scherer M.Parameters influencing porosity in sandstones:a model for sandstone porosity prediction[J].AAPGBulletin,1987,71(5):485-491.
[24] 操应长,葸克来,王艳忠,等.冀中坳陷廊固凹陷河西务构造带古近系沙河街组四段储集层孔隙度演化定量研究[J].古地理学报,2013,15(5):593-604. Cao Yingchang,Xi Kelai,Wang Yanzhong,et al.Quantitative research on porosity evolution of reservoirs in the Member 4 of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Hexiwu structural zone of Langgu sag,Jizhong Depression[J].JOPC,2013,15(5):593-604.
[25] 应凤祥,罗平,何东博,等.中国含油气盆地碎屑岩储集层成岩作用与成岩数值模拟[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2004:1-141. Ying Fengxiang,Luo Ping,He Dongbo,et al.Diagenesis and numerical simulation of clastic reservoir in oil-gas bearing basins,China[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2004:1-141.
[26] 魏巍,朱筱敏,国殿斌,等.查干凹陷下白垩统砂岩储层碳酸盐胶结物成岩期次及形成机理[J].地球化学,201544(6):590-599. Wei Wei,Zhu Xiaomin,Guo Dianbin,et al.Carbonate cements in Lower Cretaceous Bayingebi sandstone reservoirs in Chagan Sag,Yine Basin:Formation phases and formation mechanisms[J].Geo Chemical,201544(6):590-599.
[27] 杨晓萍,赵文智,邹才能,等.低渗透储层成因机理及优质储层形成与分布[J].石油学报,2007,28(4):57-61. Yang Xiaoping,Zhao Wenzhi,Zou Caineng,et al.Origin of low-permeability reservoir and distribution of favorable reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2007,28(4):57-61.

构造活动及层序格架约束下的沉积、成岩作用对储层质量的影响——以松辽盆地南部大情字井地区葡萄花油层为例

Impact of sedimentation and diagenesis upon reservoir quality under constraint of tectonic activities and sequence stratigraphic framework-A case study of Putaohua oil layer in Daqingzijing area of southern Songliao Basin

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	姜振学, 李鑫, 王幸蒙, 王国臻, 仇恒远, 朱德宇, 姜鸿阳. 中国南方典型页岩孔隙特征差异及其控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 41-53.
[2]	王濡岳, 胡宗全, 董立, 高波, 孙川翔, 杨滔, 王冠平, 尹帅. 页岩气储层表征评价技术进展与思考[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 54-65.
[3]	王红岩, 施振生, 孙莎莎, 张磊夫. 四川盆地及周缘志留系龙马溪组一段深层页岩储层特征及其成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 66-75.
[4]	沈骋, 任岚, 赵金洲, 陈铭培. 页岩岩相组合划分标准及其对缝网形成的影响——以四川盆地志留系龙马溪组页岩为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 98-106, 123.
[5]	蔡全升, 陈孝红, 张国涛, 张保民, 韩京, 陈琳, 李培军, 李炎桂. 鄂西宜昌地区下古生界五峰组-龙马溪组页岩气储层发育特征与勘探潜力[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 107-123.
[6]	刘忠宝, 胡宗全, 刘光祥, 刘珠江, 刘晧天, 郝景宇, 王鹏威, 李鹏. 四川盆地东北部下侏罗统自流井组陆相页岩储层孔隙特征及形成控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 136-145.
[7]	程洪, 张杰, 张文彪. 断溶体储层类型识别、预测及发育模式探讨——以塔里木盆地塔河十区TH10421单元为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 996-1003.
[8]	田立新, 王清斌, 刘晓健, 郝轶伟. 渤海海域莱州湾凹陷沙河街组硅化碎屑岩地质特征及其储层意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 1073-1082.
[9]	孙焕泉. 薄储层超稠油热化学复合采油方法与技术[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 1100-1106.
[10]	蔡勋育, 邱桂强, 孙冬胜, 朱宏权, 王威, 曾治平. 中国中西部大型盆地致密砂岩油气“甜点”类型与特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 684-695.
[11]	李进步, 李娅, 张吉, 杨特波, 樊爱萍, 杨仁超, 崔明明. 苏里格气田西南部致密砂岩气藏资源评价方法及评价参数的影响因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 730-743, 762.
[12]	张金才, 亓原昌. 地应力对页岩储层开发的影响与对策[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 776-783, 799.
[13]	廉培庆, 高文彬, 汤翔, 段太忠, 王付勇, 赵华伟, 李宜强. 基于CT扫描图像的碳酸盐岩油藏孔隙分类方法[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 852-861.
[14]	朱可丹, 张友, 林彤, 王雅春, 郑兴平, 朱琳. 基于CT成像的白云岩储层孔喉非均质性分析——以塔东古城地区奥陶系GC601井鹰三段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 862-873.
[15]	郭龙龙, 陈洪德, 黄晓波, 王峻, 冯冲. 富长石粗碎屑砂岩孔隙演化定量分析——以渤海湾盆地辽东凸起北段沙河街组二段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 874-883.