苏北盆地高邮凹陷古近系阜宁组断层形成过程及其砂箱物理模拟

doi:10.11743/ogg20210216

石油与天然气地质 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 469-480.doi: 10.11743/ogg20210216

苏北盆地高邮凹陷古近系阜宁组断层形成过程及其砂箱物理模拟

唐旭^1,²(), 孙永河^1,^3,*(), 胡慧婷^1,³, 于雯泉⁴, 唐海氢⁵

1. 东北石油大学地球科学学院, 黑龙江大庆 163318
2. 中国石油大学(北京) 地球科学学院, 北京 102249
3. 东北石油大学 “断裂控藏”CNPC重点实验室, 黑龙江大庆 163318
4. 中国石化江苏油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 江苏扬州 225009
5. 中国石油华北油田分公司第三采油厂, 河北河间 062450

收稿日期:2019-01-10 出版日期:2021-04-28 发布日期:2021-04-21
通讯作者: 孙永河 E-mail:415190403@qq.com;syh79218@163.com
第一作者简介:唐旭(1994—)，男，硕士研究生，盆地构造解析。E-mail: 415190403@qq.com
基金项目:
国家自然科学基金项目(41572127);国家科技重大专项(2016ZX05006-005)

Fault development and its analogue modeling in the Paleogene Funing Formation in Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin

Xu Tang^1,²(), Yonghe Sun^1,^3,*(), Huiting Hu^1,³, Wenquan Yu⁴, Haiqing Tang⁵

1. School of Earth Sciences, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, Heilongjiang 163318, China
2. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
3. Laboratory of CNPC Fault Controlling Reservoir, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, Heilongjiang 163318, China
4. Exploration and Development Research Institute of Jiangsu Oilfield Company, SINOPEC, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China
5. The 3rd Oil Production Plant of Huabei Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Hejian, Hebei 062450, China

Received:2019-01-10 Online:2021-04-28 Published:2021-04-21
Contact: Yonghe Sun E-mail:415190403@qq.com;syh79218@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

高邮凹陷阜宁组断层发育对凹陷演化过程及油气富集具有重要意义。高邮凹陷东部发育大量多米诺式组合的NW倾向断层，西部发育“Ⅴ”字型组合的NW及SE倾向的断层，断层发育特征的差异指示断层形成过程不同，不同区带断层形成机制尚不明确。通过三维地震解释、识别不整合面及残余地层，结合位移-埋深曲线分析、构造演化分析，证明了高邮凹陷边界断层在阜宁组为非同沉积断层，对凹陷内部次级断层的形成没有明显控制作用。凹陷东、西部不同组合类型的阜宁组断层均在NW-SE向统一应力场下形成，主要活动时期均为阜宁组沉积末期，在活动性上具有统一性。依据断裂解析结论及相似性原则，设计两组物理模拟实验。实验结果表明，高邮凹陷西部“Ⅴ”字型断层组合受双侧伸展作用形成，而东部多米诺式断层组合受单侧伸展作用控制，与东部斜坡背景无关。两组实验结果合理地解释了断层组合模式差异性的成因。区域上，戴南组沉积之前高邮凹陷与北部临泽凹陷为同一凹陷，凹陷形态西窄东宽，在伸展变形时期盆地两侧应力向中心传播速度不同，导致不同地区发育不同倾向断层的叠覆区域范围有所差异。

关键词: 断层组合样式, 断层活动性, 形成过程, 物理模拟, 阜宁组, 古近系, 高邮凹陷, 苏北盆地

Abstract:

The study of fault development characteristics of the Funing Formation in Gaoyou Sag is of great significance to the understanding of the sag evolution and oil-gas enrichment.There are a large number of domino-type faults dipping NW in the east of the sag, and Ⅴ-shaped faults dipping NW and SE in the west of the sag.The difference in fault development characteristics indicates different fault formation processes, and the fault formation mechanisms in different zones are yet to clarified.Through three-dimensional seismic interpretation, unconformity and residual stratum identification, combined with displacement-depth curve and structural evolution analyses, it is proven that the boundary faults in the Funing Formation of Gaoyou Sag are non-syndepositional, thus having no obvious control on the formation of secondary faults in the sag.All faults of different assemblages in the east and west of the sag are formed under uniform stress field striking NW-SE, with main activities occurring at the end of the Funing Formation deposition.Two sets of physical simulation experiments were therefore designed according to the analytic conclusion of faults and the principle of similarity.The experimental results show that the Ⅴ-shaped fault assemblage in the west is formed under bilateral extension, while the domino fault assemblage in the east is controlled by unilateral extension and has no link to the eastern slope.The results of the two sets of experiments can reasonably explain the causes of the differential fault assemblage patterns.Geographically, before the deposition of Dainan Formation, Gaoyou Sag was in the same sag with Linze Sag in the north of the basin that is characterized by a narrow west and wide east.During the extensional deformation period, the stress propagation velocity on both sides of the basin to the center was different, leading to the differential overlapping zones with faults striking to various directions in different areas.

Key words: fault assemblage pattern, fault activity, formation process, analogue modeling, Funing Formation, Paleogene, Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin

中图分类号:

TE121.1

唐旭,孙永河,胡慧婷,等. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷古近系阜宁组断层形成过程及其砂箱物理模拟[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 469-480. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210216 Xu Tang,Yonghe Sun,Huiting Hu,et al. Fault development and its analogue modeling in the Paleogene Funing Formation in Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(2): 469-480. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210216

图/表 12

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

表1

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

参考文献 25

1	肖秋生. 苏北老油区勘探管理工作的实践与认识[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2008, 15 (4): 108- 110.
	Xiao Qiusheng . The practice and recognition of exploration management about old petroliferous districts in Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2008, 15 (4): 108- 110.
2	舒良树, 王博, 王良书, 等. 苏北盆地晚白垩世-新近纪原型盆地分析[J]. 高校地质学报, 2005, 11 (4): 534- 543. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2005.04.009
	Shu Liangshu , Wang Bo , Wang Liangshu , et al. Analysis of Northern Jiangsu Prototype Basin from Late Cretaceous to Neogene[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2005, 11 (4): 534- 543. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2005.04.009
3	邱海峻, 许志琴, 乔德武. 苏北盆地构造演化研究进展[J]. 地质通报, 2006, 25 (9): 1117- 1120. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2006.09.023
	Qiu Haijun , Xu Zhiqin , Qiao Dewu . Progress in the study of the tectonic evolution of the Subei basin, Jiangsu, China[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2006, 25 (9): 1117- 1120. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2006.09.023
4	周冰, 金之钧, 刘全有, 等. 苏北盆地黄桥地区富CO₂流体对油气储-盖系统的改造作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (6): 1151- 1161.
	Zhou Bing , Jin Zhijun , Liu Quanyou , et al. Alteration of reservoir-caprock systems by using CO₂-rich fluid in the Huangqiao area, North Jiangsu Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (6): 1151- 1161.
5	付茜, 刘启东, 刘世丽, 等. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油成藏条件分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42 (4): 625- 631.
	Fu Qian , Liu Qidong , Liu Shili , et al. Shale oil accumulation conditions in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation, Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42 (4): 625- 631.
6	陈安定. 苏北盆地构造特征及箕状断陷形成机理[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31 (2): 140- 150.
	Chen Anding . Tectonic features of the Subei Basin and the forming mechanism of its dustpan-shaped fault depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2010, 31 (2): 140- 150.
7	能源, 杨桥, 张克鑫, 等. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷晚白垩世-新生代构造沉降史分析与构造演化[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2009, 29 (2): 25- 32.
	Neng Yuan , Yang Qiao , Zhang Kexin , et al. Tectonic subsidence and evolution of the Gaoyou Depression in northern Jiangsu Basin during the late cretaceous to the Cenozoic[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2009, 29 (2): 25- 32.
8	朱光, 姜芹芹, 朴学峰, 等. 基底断层在断陷盆地断层系统发育中的作用——以苏北盆地南部高邮凹陷为例[J]. 地质学报, 2013, 87 (4): 441- 452. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2013.04.001
	Zhu Guang , Jiang Qinqin , Piao Xuefeng , et al. Role of basement faults in faulting system development of a rift basin: an example from the Gaoyou Sag in Southern Subei Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2013, 87 (4): 441- 452. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2013.04.001
9	姜芹芹, 周绍荣, 朱光, 等. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷隐蔽性断层构造特征分析与预测[J]. 地质学刊, 2016, 40 (1): 37- 46.
	Jiang Qinqin , Zhou Shaorong , Zhu Guang , et al. Structural characteristics and prediction of the concealed faults in the Gaoyou Sag of Subei basin[J]. Journal of Geology, 2016, 40 (1): 37- 46.
10	吴林, 陈清华. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷基底断裂构造特征及成因演化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26 (4): 689- 699.
	Wu Lin , Chen Qinghua . Structural characteristics and evolution of basement faults in Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26 (4): 689- 699.
11	漆家福, 杨桥, 童亨茂, 等. 构造因素对半地堑盆地的层序充填的影响[J]. 地球科学: 中国地质大学学报, 1997, 22 (6): 603- 608.
	Qi Jiafu , Yang Qiao , Tong Hengmao , et al. Sequence construction response to tectonic process in extensional half-graben basin[J]. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 1997, 22 (6): 603- 608.
12	王玺, 陈清华, 朱文斌, 等. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷边界断裂带构造特征及成因[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2013, 37 (1): 20- 28.
	Wang Xi , Chen Qinghua , Zhu Wenbin , et al. Structural characteristics and origin of boundary fault belts of the Gaoyou Sag in the Subei Basin[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2013, 37 (1): 20- 28.
13	周磊, 王永诗, 于雯泉, 等. 基于物性上、下限计算的致密砂岩储层分级评价——以苏北盆地高邮凹陷阜宁组一段致密砂岩为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (06): 1308- 1316+1323.
	Zhou Lei , Wang Yongshi , Yu Wenquan , et al. Classification assessment of tight sandstone reservoir based on calculation of lower and upper limits of physical properties-A case study of the tight sandstone reservoir in the 1st member of Funing Formation in Gaoyou Sag, North Jiangsu Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (06): 1308- 1316+1323.
14	孙永河, 李雪松, 刘志达, 等. 尼日尔三角洲东部斜向背斜形成演化特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45 (1): 51- 61.
	Sun Yonghe , Li Xuesong , Liu Zhida , et al. Formation and evolution of oblique anticline at the eastern portion of the Niger Delta[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45 (1): 51- 61.
15	Ryan L , Magee C , Jackson A L . The kinematics of normal faults in the Ceduna Subbasin, offshore southern Australia: Implications for hydrocarbon trapping in a frontier basin[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2017, 101 (3): 321- 341.
16	Vendeville B C, Cobbold P R, Davy P, et al. Physical models of extensional tectonics at various scales[C]//Coward M P, Dewey J F, Hancock P L. Continental Extensional Tectonics. London: The Geological Society, 1987: 95-107.
17	陈福巨, 周建勋, 陆克政. 伸展断层系统的砂箱模拟实验[J]. 世界地质, 1997, 16 (3): 13- 17.
	Chen Fuju , Zhou Jianxun , Lu Kezheng . Sand-box analog models of extensional fault systems[J]. Global Geology, 1997, 16 (3): 13- 17.
18	童亨茂, 孟令箭, 蔡东升, 等. 裂陷盆地断层的形成和演化——目标砂箱模拟实验与认识[J]. 地质学报, 2009, 83 (6): 759- 774.
	Tong Hengmao , Meng Lingjian , Cai Dongsheng , et al. Fault formation and evolution in rift basins: sandbox modeling and cognition[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2009, 83 (6): 759- 774.
19	史帅雨, 余一欣, 殷进垠, 等. 下刚果盆地盐构造变形特征及其形成机理[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (5): 1092- 1099.
	Shi Shuaiyu , Yu Yixin , Yin Jinyin , et al. Deformation characteristics and formation mechanisms of salt structures in the Lower Congo Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (5): 1092- 1099.
20	赵利, 廖宗廷, 徐旭辉, 等. 陆内山前冲断结构分带的构造物理模拟实验[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41 (6): 871- 878.
	Zhao Li , Liao Zongting , Xu Xuhui , et al. Physical modeling of thrusting structure zonation in front of an intracontinental orogen[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41 (6): 871- 878.
21	McClay K R, Ellis P G. Analogue models of extensional fault geometries[C]//Coward M P, Dewey J F, Hancock P L. Continental Extensional Tectonics. London: The Geological Society, 1987: 109-125.
22	Eisenstadt G , Sims D . Evaluating sand and clay models: do rheological differences matter?[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2005, 27 (8): 1399- 1412.
23	张蕾, 王军, 张中巧, 等. 基于地震物理模拟的三角洲砂体识别及刻画技术[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2019, 33 (1): 30- 33.
	Zhang Lei , Wang Jun , Zhang Zhongqiao , et al. Identification and characterization of delta sand bodies based on seismic physical simulation[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2019, 33 (1): 30- 33.
24	Buchanan P G , McClay K R . Experiments on basin inversion above reactivated domino faults[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 1992, 9 (5): 486- 500.
25	McClay K R , White M J . Analogue modelling of orthogonal and oblique rifting[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 1995, 12 (2): 137- 151.

物理参数	实际值	模型值	相似系数
重力加速度(g)/(m·s^-2)	9.8	9.8	1
变形长度(l)/m	6 500	0.15	0.4×10^-5
伸展率/%	25	25	1
岩石密度(ρ)/(g·cm^-3)	3.00	2.65	0.89
粘度(η)/(Pa·s)	10¹⁷~10²¹	10²~10³	10^-15~10^-18
内摩擦角(ϕ)/(°)	31	31	1

[1]	蒲秀刚, 董姜畅, 柴公权, 宋舜尧, 时战楠, 韩文中, 张伟, 解德录. 渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷古近系孔店组二段页岩高丰度有机质富集模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 696-709.
[2]	韩载华, 刘华, 赵兰全, 刘景东, 尹丽娟, 李磊. 渤海湾盆地临南洼陷古近系沙河街组源-储组合类型与致密（低渗）砂岩油差异富集模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 722-738.
[3]	李军, 邹友龙, 路菁. 陆相页岩油储层可动油含量测井评价方法[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 816-826.
[4]	高和群, 高玉巧, 何希鹏, 聂军. 苏北盆地古近系阜宁组二段页岩油储层岩石力学特征及其控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 502-515.
[5]	董鑫旭, 周兴海, 李昆, 蒲仁海, 王爱国, 关蕴文, 张鹏. 海上稀疏井区高精度地层格架约束下的地震沉积学刻画[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 293-308.
[6]	远光辉, 彭光荣, 张丽丽, 孙辉, 陈淑慧, 刘浩, 赵晓阳. 珠江口盆地白云凹陷古近系深层高变温背景下储层成岩作用与低渗致密化机制[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 44-64.
[7]	杨小艺, 刘成林, 王飞龙, 李国雄, 冯德浩, 杨韬政, 何志斌, 苏加佳. 渤海湾盆地渤中凹陷西南洼古近系东营组超压分布特征及成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 96-112.
[8]	方志雄, 肖秋生, 张殿伟, 段宏亮. 苏北盆地陆相“断块型”页岩油地质特征及勘探实践[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1468-1478.
[9]	王永诗, 巩建强, 陈冬霞, 邱贻博, 茆书巍, 雷文智, 杨怀宇, 王翘楚. 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷盐家地区深层砂砾岩油气藏相态演化及成藏过程[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1159-1172.
[10]	刘天, 刘小平, 刘启东, 段宏亮, 刘世丽, 孙彪, 化祖献. 陆相页岩游离油定量表征及其影响因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 910-922.
[11]	刘豪, 徐长贵, 高阳东, 林鹤鸣, 邱欣卫, 剧永涛, 汪旭东, 李磊, 孟俊, 阙晓明. 断陷湖盆低勘探区源-汇系统与烃源岩预测[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(3): 565-583.
[12]	高阳东, 彭光荣, 张向涛, 汪旭东, 孙辉, 刘太勋, 孙丰春. 珠江口盆地白云凹陷古近系文昌组源-汇系统特征及演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(3): 584-599.
[13]	彭光荣, 王绪诚, 陈维涛, 靳瑶瑶, 王菲, 王文勇, 全涵. 珠江口盆地惠州26洼东南缘古近系恩平组上段断-拗转换期源-汇系统及勘探意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(3): 613-625.
[14]	杜晓峰, 庞小军, 黄晓波, 王冰洁. 辽西凹陷北部古近系沙河街组二段源-汇系统及其对滩坝砂体的控制[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(3): 662-674.
[15]	吕心瑞, 邬兴威, 孙建芳, 夏东领, 李彦普, 丁炎志, 王斌. 深层碳酸盐岩储层溶洞垮塌物理模拟及分布预测[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(6): 1505-1514.

苏北盆地高邮凹陷古近系阜宁组断层形成过程及其砂箱物理模拟

Fault development and its analogue modeling in the Paleogene Funing Formation in Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics