三塘湖盆地卡拉岗组火山岩风化壳储层微纳米孔隙演变机制及与含油性关系

doi:10.11743/ogg20190612

石油与天然气地质 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 1281-1294,1307.doi: 10.11743/ogg20190612

三塘湖盆地卡拉岗组火山岩风化壳储层微纳米孔隙演变机制及与含油性关系

田伟超^1,2,3, 卢双舫^1,3, 王伟明^1,2,3, 李进步^1,3, 李壮^1,3, 李杰⁴

1. 中国石油大学(华东) 深层油气重点实验室, 山东青岛 266580;
2. 山东省沉积成矿作用与沉积矿产重点实验室, 山东青岛 266590;
3. 中国石油大学(华东) 地球科学与技术学院, 山东青岛 266580;
4. 中国石油吐哈油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 新疆哈密 839000

收稿日期:2018-11-29 修回日期:2019-08-12 出版日期:2019-12-28 发布日期:2019-10-15
通讯作者: 卢双舫(1962-),男,教授、博士生导师,油气地球化学与非常规油气勘探。E-mail:lushuangfang@qq.com。 E-mail:lushuangfang@qq.com
作者简介:田伟超(1990-),男,博士研究生,非常规油气地质。E-mail:b16010038@s.upc.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41672125）；国家油气重大专项（2017ZX05070-001）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目（18CX06033A）。

Evolution mechanism of micro/nano-scale pores in volcanic weathering crust reservoir in the Kalagang Formation in Santanghu Basin and their relationship with oil-bearing property

Tian Weichao^1,2,3, Lu Shuangfang^1,3, Wang Weiming^1,2,3, Li Jinbu^1,3, Li Zhuang^1,3, Li Jie⁴

1. Key Laboratory of Deep Oil and Gas, China University of Petroleum(East China), Qingdao, Shandong 266580, China;
2. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Depositional Mineralization & Sedimentary Mineral, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China;
3. School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum(East China), Qingdao, Shandong 266580, China;
4. Exploration and Development Research Institute of Tuha Oilfield Company Ltd., PetroChina, Kumul, Xinjiang 839000, China

Received:2018-11-29 Revised:2019-08-12 Online:2019-12-28 Published:2019-10-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 综合应用铸体薄片、扫描电镜、全岩矿物分析、低温氮气吸附和高压压汞实验对三塘湖盆地卡拉岗组火山岩风化壳储层孔隙结构进行表征，并进一步探讨微纳米孔隙演变机制，同时结合油气显示资料或试油资料揭示孔喉结构对储层含油性的影响。结果表明：火山岩风化壳储层发育溶蚀孔、残余气孔、晶间孔、裂缝四类储集空间；吸附-脱附等温曲线中的回滞环以H2型和近H2为主，且样品整体退汞效率都很低，在24.26%~44.91%，暗示孔隙形状以墨水瓶型为主；储层孔径主要分布在1 μm以下，局部发育微米级残余气孔和溶孔。火山岩原始矿物组成中辉石含量越低、斜长石含量越高，会导致岩浆期后热液作用阶段形成低含量绿泥石、高含量沸石，后期储层可以得到有效改造，品质变好。Swanson参数及其对应半径（r_apex）可以很好地揭示储层基质渗透率，且Swanson参数与火山岩风化壳储层含油性关系最好。当Swanson参数大于2时，储层为油层，介于0.86和2之间，表现为差油层，小于0.86时，储层多为干层。Swanson参数可作为指示储层含油性的关键参数，可为有利区的优选提供依据。

关键词: 孔隙结构, 演变机制, 含油性, 火山岩风化壳储层, 三塘湖盆地

Abstract: Various data including casting thin section,scanning electron microscopy (SEM),XRD whole-rock mineral analysis,low-temperature nitrogen adsorption (LTNA) and high pressure mercury injection (HPMI) experiments are integrated to characterize the micro/nano-scale pore structure of the volcanic weathering crust reservoir in the Kalagang Formation (C₂k),Santanghu Basin,study in-depth the evolution mechanism of micro/nano-scale pores,and reveal the effect of pore throat structure on the oil-bearing property of reservoir in combination with oil/gas shows and formation testing data.The results show as follows.Four types of reservoir space,namely dissolution pores,residual pores,intercrystalline pores and fractures,are recognized in the volcanic weathering crust reservoir.The adsorption-desorption isotherm curves are dominated by hysteresis loops of Type H2 or near Type H2,and the efficiency of mercury ejection is quite low,varying from 24.26% to 44.91%,in samples as a whole,suggesting that the pores are mainly ink-bottle shaped.The reservoir is dominated by a pore size of below 1 μm,with micro-scale residual pores and dissolved pores developed locally.The lower content of pyroxene and the higher content of plagioclase in the original mineral composition of the volcanic rocks,will result in the development of low-content chlorite and high-content zeolite in the post-magmatic hydrothermal stage.Thereafter the volcanic reservoir can be effectively modified and get better in quality.The Swanson parameter and r_apex can well demonstrate its matrix permeability.However,the Swanson parameter is closely related with the oil-bearing property of volcanic weathering crust reservoirs.When the Swanson parameter is greater than 2,the reservoirs are the oil layers; when it varies between 0.86 and 2,the reservoirs are poor pay zones; while when it is less than 0.86,the reservoirs are mostly dry layers.In conclusion,the Swanson parameter can be used as a key parameter to indicate the oil-bearing property of reservoir,and provide a basis for play fairway selection.

Key words: pore structure, evolution mechanism, oil-bearing property, volcanic weathering crust reservoir, Santanghu Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

田伟超,卢双舫,王伟明,等. 三塘湖盆地卡拉岗组火山岩风化壳储层微纳米孔隙演变机制及与含油性关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(6): 1281-1294,1307. doi: 10.11743/ogg20190612 Tian Weichao,Lu Shuangfang,Wang Weiming,et al. Evolution mechanism of micro/nano-scale pores in volcanic weathering crust reservoir in the Kalagang Formation in Santanghu Basin and their relationship with oil-bearing property[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(6): 1281-1294,1307. doi: 10.11743/ogg20190612

参考文献 33

[1]	李光云.三塘湖盆地马朗凹陷上石炭统火山岩油藏形成条件与主控因素[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京)能源学院,2010. Li Guangyun.The forming condition and the key controlling factor of the upper Carboniferous volcanic oil pool in Malang Sag of Santanghu Basin[D].Beijing China University of Geosciences (Beijing):School of Energy Resources,2010.
[2]	董国栋,张琴,朱筱敏,等.火山岩储层研究现状及存在问题——以准噶尔盆地克-夏地区下二叠统火山岩为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2012,33(4):511-519. Dong Guodong,Zhang Qin,Zhu Xiaomin,et al.Current status and problems of volcanic reservoir study:an example from theLower Permian volcanic rocks in Ke-Xia area of Junggar Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2012,33(4):511-519.
[3]	李森明,陈凤来,漆万珍,等.马朗凹陷下二叠统风化壳特征与油气成藏关系[J].新疆石油地质,2007,28(5):554-556. Li Senming,Chen Fenglai,Qi Wanzhen,et al.Relationship between weathering crust characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation of Lower Permian in Malang Sag,Santanghu Basin[J].Xinjiang Petro-leum Geology,2007,28(5):554-556.
[4]	刘俊田,朱有信,李在光,等.三塘湖盆地石炭系火山岩油藏特征及主控因素[J].岩性油气藏,2009,21(3):23-28. Liu Juntian,Zhu Youxin,Li Zaiguang,et al.Characteristics and controlling factors of volcanic reservoir ofCarboniferous in Santanghu Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2009,21(3):23-28.
[5]	李光云,毛世权,陈凤来,等.三塘湖盆地马朗凹陷卡拉岗组火山岩油藏主控因素及勘探方向[J].中国石油勘探,2010,15(1):11-15. Li Guangyun,Mao Shiquan,Chen Fenglai,et al.Key controlling factors and exploration direction of volcanic reservoir in Kalagang Formation of Malang Sag in Santanghu Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2010,15(1):11-15.
[6]	黄志龙,柳波,罗权生,等.三塘湖盆地马朗凹陷石炭系火山岩系油气成藏主控因素及模式[J].地质学报,2012,86(8):1210-1216. Huang Zhilong,Liu Bo,Luo Quansheng,et al.Main controlling factors and models of Carboniferous volcanic hydrocarbon accumulation in the Malang Sag,Santang Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2012,86(8):1210-1216
[7]	郑曼,吴晓智,李建忠,等.三塘湖盆地火山岩油藏特征与成藏过程分析[J].地质科学,2013,48(4):1246-1257. Zheng Man,WuXiaozhi,Li Jianzhong,et al.Characteristics of volcanic reservoir and process of petroleum entrapment in Santanghu Basin[J].Chinese Journal of Geology,2013,48(4):1246-1257.
[8]	宋明水,赵乐强,吴春文,等.准噶尔盆地车排子地区石炭系顶部风化壳结构及其控藏作用[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(3):313-321. Song Mingshui,Zhao Leqiang,Wu Wenchun,et al.Structure and reservoir-controlling of top Carboniferous weathering crust in Chepaizi area,Junggar Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2016,37(3):313-321.
[9]	朱伯生,冯建新,胡斌,等.对三塘湖盆地基底的认识[J].新疆石油地质,1997,18(3):197-200. Zhu Bosheng,Feng Jianxin,Hu Bin,et al.An understanding of the basement of Santanghu Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology 1997,18(3):197-200
[10]	刘兴旺,郑建京,杨鑫,等.三塘湖盆地及其周缘地区古生代构造演化及原型盆地研究[J].天然气地球科学,2010,21(6):947-954. Liu Xingwang,Zheng Jianjing,Yang Xin,et al.Paleozoic structural evolution of Santanghu Basin and its surrounding and prototype basin recovery[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2010,21(6):947-954.
[11]	侯连华,王京红,邹才能,等.火山岩风化体储层控制因素研究——以三塘湖盆地石炭系卡拉岗组为例[J].地质学报,2011,85(4):557-568. Hou Lianhua,Wang Jinghong,Zou Caineng,et al.Controlling factors of weathering volcanic reservoir:an example from the Carboniferous Kalagang Formation in Santanghu Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2011,85(4):557-568.
[12]	Sing K S W.Reportingphysisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984)[J].Pure and Applied Chemistry,1985,57(4):603-619.
[13]	王民,关莹,李传明,等.济阳坳陷沙河街组湖相页岩储层孔隙定性描述及全孔径定量评价[J].石油与天然气地质,2018,39(6):1107-1119. Wang Min,Guan Ying,Li Chuanming,et al.Qualitative description and full-pore-size quantitative evaluation of pores inlacustrine shale reservoir of Shahejie Formation,Jiyang Depression[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2018,39(6):1107-1119.
[14]	Esparza J M,Ojeda M L,Campero A,et al.Development and sorption characterization of some model mesoporous and microporous silica adsorbents[J].Journal of Molecular Catalysis A:Chemical,2005,228(1-2):97-110.
[15]	Klimakow M,Klobes P,Rademann K,et al.Characterization of mechanochemically synthesized MOFs[J].Microporous and Mesoporous Materials,2012,154:113-118.
[16]	侯宇光,何生,易积正,等.页岩孔隙结构对甲烷吸附能力的影响[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(2):248-256. Hou Yuguang,He Sheng,Yi Jizheng,et al.Effect of pore structure on methane sorption potential of shales[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(2):248-256.
[17]	Groen J C,Peffer L A A,Pérez-Ramírez J.Pore size determination in modified micro-and mesoporous materials.Pitfalls and limitations in gas adsorption data analysis[J].Microporous and mesoporous mate-rials,2003,60(1-3):1-17.
[18]	Kaufmann J,Loser R,Leemann A.Analysis of cement-bonded mate-rials by multi-cycle mercury intrusion and nitrogen sorption[J].Journal of Colloid and Interface Science,2009,336(2):730-737.
[19]	Adesida A G,Akkutlu I,Resasco D E,et al.Characterization of barnett shale kerogen pore size distribution using DFT analysis and grand canonical monte carlo simulations[C]//SPE annual technical conference and exhibition.Colorado,USA:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2011:1-14.
[20]	Clarkson C R,Solano N,Bustin R M,et al.Pore structure characte-rization of North American shale gas reservoirs using USANS/SANS,gas adsorption,and mercury intrusion[J].Fuel,2013,103:606-616.
[21]	杨金龙,罗静兰,何发歧,等.塔河地区二叠系火山岩储集层特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2004,31(4):44-47. Yang Jinlong,Luo Jinglan,He Qifa,et al.Permian volcanic reservoirs in the Tahe region[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2004,31(4):44-47.
[22]	林潼,焦贵浩,孙平,等.三塘湖盆地石炭系火山岩储层特征及其影响因素分析[J].天然气地球科学,2009,20(4):513-517. Lin Tong,Jiao Guihao,Sun Ping,et al.Characteristic and influencing factors of carboniferous volcanic reservoirs in Santanghu Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2009,20(4):513-517.
[23]	孙玉善.克拉玛依油区沸石类矿物特征及其与油气的关系[J].岩相古地理,1993,13(2):37-48. SunYushan.Mineralogical charateristics of zeolite minerals and their bearings to the reservoir beds in the Karamay oil field[J].Sedimentary Facies and Palaeogeography,1993,13(2):37-48.
[24]	陈亦寒,刘大锰,魏喜,等.海外河油田东营组自生沸石的发现成因及其地质意义[J].石油天然气学报,2008,30(4):54-56. Chen Yihan,Liu Dameng,Wei Xi,et al.Discovery and origin of the diagenetic zeolite in Dongying Formation of Haiwaihe Oilfield and its geo-logical significance[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2008,30(4):54-56.
[25]	柳成志,于海山,吕延防,等.三塘湖盆地马朗凹陷卡拉岗组火山岩油气储层特征及其形成机理[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,2012,37(s1):134-142. Liu Chengzhi,Yu Haishan,Lv Yanfang,et al.Volcanic oil and gas reservoir characteristics and formation mechanism in Kalagang Formation of Malang Sag in Santanghu Basin[J].Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geoscience,2012,37(s1):134-142.
[26]	王君,朱如凯,郭宏莉,等.火山岩风化壳储层发育模式——以三塘湖盆地马朗凹陷石炭系火山岩为例[J].岩石学报,2010,26(1):217-226. Wang Jun,ZhuRukai,Guo Hongli,et al.Wethered crust volcanic reservoir:a case study on Malang depression,Carboniferous Santanghu Basin,NW,China[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2010,26(1):217-226.
[27]	王盛鹏,林潼,孙平,等.两种不同沉积环境下火山岩储层成岩作用研究[J].石油实验地质,2012,34(2):145-152. Wang Shengpeng,Lin Tong,Sun Ping,et al.Influences of diagenetic effects on volcanic rockreservoirs under two different sedimentary environments[J].Peroleum Geology & Experiment,2012,34(2):145-152.
[28]	孔垂显,陈轩,秦军,等.中-基性火山岩孔缝储集体形成控制因素——以准噶尔盆地金龙区块石炭系为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2018,39(3):558-566. Kong Chuixian,Chen Xuan,Qin Jun,et al.Controlling factors for the formation of pore-fracture reservoirs in intermediate-basic volcanic rocks:A case study of the Carboniferous Jinlong Block,Junggar Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2018,39(3):558-566.
[29]	吴红烛,黄志龙,柳波,等.马朗凹陷哈尔加乌组烃源岩分布和生烃演化与石炭系成藏关系[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2014,38(1):22-31. Wu Hongzhu,Huang Zhilong,Liu Bo,et al.Relationship between distribution,hydrocarbon generation and evolution of source rock in Haerjiawu formation and Carboniferous hydrocarbon accumulation in Malang sag,Santanghu Basin[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum,2014,38(1):22-31.
[30]	Swanson B F.A simple correlation betweenpermeabilities and mercury capillary pressures[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1981,33(12):2498-2504.
[31]	Higgs K E,Arnot M J,Brindle S.Advances in grain-size,mineral,and pore-scale characterization of lithic and clay-rich reservoirsCharacterization of Lithic and Clay-Rich Reservoirs[J].AAPG Bulletin,2015,99(7):1315-1348.
[32]	Aliakbardoust E,Rahimpour-Bonab H.Effects of pore geometry and rock properties on water saturation of a carbonate reservoir[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2013,112:296-309.
[33]	Comisky J T,Newsham K,Rushing J A,et al.A comparative study of capillary-pressure-based empirical models for estimating absolute permeability in tight gas sands[C]//SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.California,USA:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2007:1-17.

三塘湖盆地卡拉岗组火山岩风化壳储层微纳米孔隙演变机制及与含油性关系

Evolution mechanism of micro/nano-scale pores in volcanic weathering crust reservoir in the Kalagang Formation in Santanghu Basin and their relationship with oil-bearing property

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	姜振学, 李鑫, 王幸蒙, 王国臻, 仇恒远, 朱德宇, 姜鸿阳. 中国南方典型页岩孔隙特征差异及其控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 41-53.
[2]	王濡岳, 胡宗全, 董立, 高波, 孙川翔, 杨滔, 王冠平, 尹帅. 页岩气储层表征评价技术进展与思考[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 54-65.
[3]	霍建峰, 高健, 郭小文, 易积正, 舒志国, 包汉勇, 杨锐, 罗涛, 何生. 川东地区龙马溪组页岩不同岩相孔隙结构特征及其主控因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1162-1175.
[4]	杨天博, 何治亮, 金振奎, 张军涛, 李双建. 川西北中二叠统超深层白云岩储层孔隙结构及控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(1): 116-131.
[5]	李东晖, 聂海宽. 一种考虑气藏特征的页岩含气量计算方法——以四川盆地及其周缘焦页1井和彭页1井为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(6): 1324-1332.
[6]	许琳, 常秋生, 杨成克, 陶亲娥, 王仕莉, 费李莹, 徐士陆. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油储层特征及含油性[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 535-549.
[7]	李志明, 陶国亮, 黎茂稳, 钱门辉, 谢小敏, 蒋启贵, 刘鹏, 鲍云杰, 夏东领. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部彬长区块三叠系延长组7段3亚段页岩油勘探前景探讨[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 558-570.
[8]	李志明, 陶国亮, 黎茂稳, 蒋启贵, 曹婷婷, 刘鹏, 钱门辉, 谢小敏, 李政. 渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷沾化凹陷L69井古近系沙三下亚段取心段页岩油勘探有利层段[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(2): 236-247.
[9]	黄振凯, 刘全有, 黎茂稳, 陈建平, 李鹏, 张瑞. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7段泥页岩层系排烃效率及其含油性[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(3): 513-521,600.
[10]	张磊, 孟元林, 崔存萧, 李新宁, 陶士振, 吴晨亮, 胡安文, 许丞. 氢抑制条件下的有机质热演化动力学模型——以三塘湖盆地芦草沟组为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(5): 862-868.
[11]	李志明, 钱门辉, 黎茂稳, 蒋启贵, 刘鹏, 芮晓庆, 曹婷婷, 潘银华. 中-低成熟湖相富有机质泥页岩含油性及赋存形式——以渤海湾盆地渤南洼陷罗63井和义21井沙河街组一段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(3): 448-456,466.
[12]	王友启, 于洪敏, 聂俊, 许关利, 卢刚. 基于扩展毛管数理论的化学驱相渗曲线研究[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(2): 379-384.
[13]	王香增, 张丽霞, 李宗田, 伏海蛟. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组陆相页岩孔隙类型划分方案及其油气地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(1): 1-7.
[14]	张磊磊, 陆正元, 王军, 田同辉, 王兴建. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙三下亚段页岩油层段微观孔隙结构[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(1): 80-86.
[15]	郭威, 姚艳斌, 刘大锰, 孙晓晓, 高杨文. 基于核磁冻融技术的煤的孔隙测试研究[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(1): 141-148.