超深层碳酸盐岩层系硅质岩储层表征与评价——以塔里木盆地塔深6井为例

doi:10.11743/ogg20210302

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

塔里木盆地塔深6井揭示了奥陶系蓬莱坝组发育一定厚度的硅质岩储层，其储层发育特征与油气储集性能是当前研究焦点之一。基于岩性、电性响应特征，开展了详细的岩心观察描述、X衍射、显微岩石学分析和储集性能等储层表征与评价。分析结果表明，塔深6井硅质岩储层比同层系白云岩具有更高的孔隙度，超过7 400 m埋深下孔隙度平均值高达13.5%；主要由微晶石英组成，石英含量高达83.0%~93.7%，另有少量粘土、方解石和白云石等其他矿物。储集空间主要为石英晶间微孔隙，分布相对均一；孔隙直径多为1~10 μm，其次为0.1~1 μm，主要喉道直径为10~100 μm。原油加压饱和离线核磁共振实验研究表明，0.1~10 μm孔隙是硅质岩储层的主要储油空间，且总孔隙度越大可容纳的原油总量越大。塔深6井硅质岩储层与白云岩互层接触关系及与硅质结核的共生关系、显微层理结构特征、初始高孔隙度特征均表明其为沉积与成岩作用的共同产物，形成于台地内局部相对深水区。地震反射特征揭示储集体分布南北长约300 m、东西宽约200 m。硅质岩储层的发现对认识塔里木盆地早奥陶世碳酸盐岩台地内部结构差异性具有重要意义。

关键词: 核磁共振, 蓬莱坝组, 硅质岩储层, 超深层碳酸盐岩储层, 奥陶系, 塔里木盆地

Abstract:

Thick chert reservoirs were revealed by Well Tashen 6 penetrating the Ordovician Penglaiba Formation in the Tarim Basin and have been the focus of research for reservoir development characteristics and storage capacity. Based on lithology and electrical response characteristics, the reservoirs were studied with detailed core observation and description, X-ray diffraction, microscopic petrology analysis, reservoir performance and other reservoir characterization and evaluation methods. The results show that the reservoirs have higher porosity than dolostone reservoirs of the same sequence, with an average porosity as high as 13.5% at a burial depth of more than 7 400 m. The reservoirs are mainly composed of microcrystalline quartz, with a content as high as 83.0%-93.7%, and a small amount of clay, calcite, dolomite and other minerals. The reservoir space is relatively uniformly distributed intercrystalline micropores in quartz crystals with a pore diameter mainly varying from 1 to 10 μm, followed by 0.1-1 μm, and main throat diameter ranging from 10 to 100 μm. The off-line nuclear magnetic resonance of pressure saturated crude samples shows that pores of 0.1-10 μm in diameter serve as the main storage space. And the greater the total porosity, the greater the total amount of crude oil that can be accommodated. The interbedded siliceous-dolomite, the micro-bedding structure, the high initial porosity and the symbiotic siliceous nodules, all indicate that the reservoirs are the co-product of sedimentation and diagenesis in relatively deep water area on the platform. Furthermore, the seismic reflection characteristics reveal that the reservoir body is about 300 m long from north to south and 200 m wide from east to west. The discovery of siliceous rock reservoirs is of great significance to understanding the internal structural differences of the Early Ordovician carbonate platform in the Tarim Basin.

Key words: nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), Penglaiba Formation, chert reservoir, ultra-deep carbonate reservoir, Ordovician, Tarim Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

刘永立,尤东华,李海英,等. 超深层碳酸盐岩层系硅质岩储层表征与评价——以塔里木盆地塔深6井为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 547-556. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210302 Yongli Liu,Donghua You,Haiying Li,et al. Characterization and evaluation of chert reservoirs in ultra-deep carbonate rock formations-A case study on Well TS 6 in the Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(3): 547-556. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210302

图/表 14

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

图5

图6

表2

图7

图8

表3

图9

图10

图11

参考文献 21

1	Rogers S M . Deposition and diagenesis of Mississippian Chat Reservoirs, North-Central Oklahoma[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85 (1): 115- 129.
2	Bramlette M N . The Monterey Formation of California and the origin of its siliceous rocks[M]. Washington: US Government Printing Office, 1946: 1- 24.
3	Reid S A , Mclntyre J L . Monterey Formation porcelanite reservoirs of the Elk Hills field, Kern County, California[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85 (1): 169- 189.
4	Kolodny Y . Petology of siliceous rocks in the Mishash Formation[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1969, 39 (1): 166- 175.
5	Oehler J H . Origin and distribution of silica Lepispheres in porcelanite from the Monterey Formation of California[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1975, 45 (1): 252- 257.
6	Cady S L , Wenk H R , Downing K H . HRTEM of microcrystalline opal in chert and porcelanite from the Monterey Formation, California[J]. American Mineralogist, 1996, 81 (11): 1380- 1395.
7	Chaika C , Williams L A . Density and mineralogy variations as a function of porosity in Miocene Monterey Formation oil and gas reservoirs in California[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85 (1): 149- 167.
8	Saller A H , Horn D V , Miller J A , et al. Reservoir geology of Devonian carbonates and chert -Implications for Tertiary recovery, Dollarhide Field, Andrews County, Texas[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1991, 75 (1): 86- 107.
9	Ruppel S C , Hovorka S D . Controls on reservoir development in Devonian Chert: Permian Basin, Texas[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1995, 79 (12): 1757- 1785.
10	Montgomery S L . Thirtyone Formation, Permian Basin, Texas: Structural and lithologic heterogeneity in a Lower Devonian chert reservoir[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1998, 82 (1): 1- 24.
11	Saller A , Ball B , Robertson S , et al. Reservoir characteristics of Devonian cherts and their control on oil recovery: Dollarhide field, west Texas[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85 (1): 35- 50.
12	Ruppel S C , Barnaby R J . Contrasting styles of reservoir development in proximal and distal chert facies: Devonian Thirtyone Formation, Texas[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85 (1): 7- 33.
13	刘永立, 尤东华, 高利君, 等. 塔河油田塔深6井蓬莱坝组硅质岩成因及其地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (1): 83- 91.
	Liu Yongli , You Donghua , Gao Lijun , et al. Genesis and geological significance of siliceous rock in Penglaiba Formation in Well Tashen 6, Tahe oilfield[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (1): 83- 91.
14	蔡习尧, 钱一雄, 陈跃, 等. 塔中地区中、下奥陶统划分与对比[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2007, 28 (3): 292- 295. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3873.2007.03.010
	Cai Xiyao , Qian Yixiong , Chen Yue , et al. Division and correlation of Middle-Lower Ordovician in Tazhong area, Tarim Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2007, 28 (3): 292- 295. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3873.2007.03.010
15	Trotter J A , Williams I S , Barnes C R , et al. Did cooling oceans trigger Ordovician biodiversification? Evidence from conodont thermometry[J]. Science, 2008, 321 (5888): 550- 554. doi: 10.1126/science.1155814
16	高志前, 樊太亮, 焦志峰, 等. 塔里木盆地寒武-奥陶系碳酸盐岩台地样式及其沉积响应特征[J]. 沉积学报, 2006, 24 (1): 19- 27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.2006.01.003
	Gao Zhiqian , Fan Tailiang , Jiao Zhifeng , et al. The structural types and depositional characteristics of carbonate platform in the Cambrian-Ordovician of Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2006, 24 (1): 19- 27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.2006.01.003
17	何治亮, 彭守涛, 张涛. 塔里木盆地塔河地区奥陶系储层形成的控制因素与复合-联合成因机制[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31 (6): 743- 752.
	He Zhiliang , Peng Shoutao , Zhang Tao . Controlling factors and genetic pattern of the Ordovician reservoirs in the Tahe area, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2010, 31 (6): 743- 752.
18	Murata K J , Larson R R . Diagenesis of Miocene siliceous shales, Temblor Range, California[J]. U.S.Geological Survey Journal of Research, 1975, 3 (5): 553- 566.
19	Graham S A , Williams L A . Tectonic, depositional, and diagenetic history of Monterey Formation (Miocene), central San Joaquin Basin, California[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1985, 69 (3): 385- 411.
20	You Donghua , Han Jun , Hu Wenxuan , et al. Characteristics and formation mechanisms of silicified carbonate reservoirs in Well SN4 of the Tarim Basin[J]. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 2018, 36 (4): 820- 849.
21	Packard J J , Al-Aasm I , Samson Iain , et al. A Devonian hydrothermal chert reservoir: The 225 bcf Parkland field, British Columbia, Canada[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85 (1): 51- 84.

样品号	矿物含量/%
样品号	粘土	石英	方解石	白云石	黄铁矿	其他矿物
TS6-2-1	5.2	84.9	7.8	0.6	0.9	0.6
TS6-2-2	7.8	85.2	5.6	0.1	0.7	0.6
TS6-14-1	9.0	86.7	3.2	0.5	—	0.6
TS6-14-2	4.4	93.7	0.4	0.5	0.7	0.3
1-5	4.8	83.0	10.1	0.1	1.8	0.2
2-1	3.3	91.8	3.7	0.5	0.5	0.2

样品号	总孔隙度/%	不同孔隙直径分布范围的孔隙体积占比/%
样品号	总孔隙度/%	< 0.1 μm	0.1~1 μm	1~10 μm	>10 μm
2-8	9.1	1.11	2.48	5.52	—
2-9-2	8.2	1.06	2.39	4.60	0.15
2-9-3	8.5	1.34	2.86	4.30	—
12	17.4	1.48	3.97	11.92	0.03
22	12.3	1.08	1.28	8.68	1.26
1	13.0	11.37(< 10 μm的孔隙体积占比)			1.63
24	12.8	9.84(< 10 μm的孔隙体积占比)			2.96

样品号	深度/m	岩性	孔隙度/%	渗透率/(10^-3 μm²)	备注
1	7 418.38	硅质岩(薄层)	13.0	0.05	井壁取心
2	7 418.68	硅质岩(薄层)	17.1	0.08	井壁取心
12	7 547.47	硅质岩(厚层)	17.4	0.13	井壁取心
13	7 548.00	硅质岩(厚层)	12.6	0.36	井壁取心
14	7 549.09	硅质岩(厚层)	12.3	—	井壁取心
16	7 554.19	硅质岩(厚层)	27.9	0.71	井壁取心
19	7 561.49	硅质岩(厚层)	11.0	0.03	井壁取心
21	7 571.48	硅质岩(厚层)	16.2	0.54	井壁取心
22	7 576.71	硅质岩(厚层)	12.3	0.09	井壁取心
24	7 592.65	硅质岩(厚层)	12.8	0.66	井壁取心
25	7 603.85	硅质岩(厚层)	10.2	0.13	井壁取心
2-8	7 442.60	硅质岩(薄层)	9.1	0.02	岩心
2-9-2	7 442.70	硅质岩(薄层)	8.2	0.02	岩心
2-9-3	7 442.75	硅质岩(薄层)	8.5	0.01	岩心
5	7 432.48	白云岩	4.5	0.01	井壁取心
9	7 491.18	白云岩	3.0	0.02	井壁取心
28	7 268.79	白云岩	1.6	0.09	井壁取心
29	7 716.48	白云岩	5.3	0.03	井壁取心
2-9-4	7 442.80	白云岩	1.3	0	岩心
2-9-5	7 442.85	白云岩	1.0	0	岩心

[1]	张君龙, 胡明毅, 汪爱云, 张斌, 闫博, 何香香. 塔里木盆地古城台缘带寒武系丘滩体沉积构型特征及储层分布规律[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 557-569.
[2]	何光玉, 曹自成, 姚泽伟, 廖天奇, 林波. 塔里木盆地古城地区古生界垒-扭叠合复合断层-裂缝体模型[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 587-594.
[3]	林煜, 李相文, 陈康, 张银涛, 臧殿光, 郁智. 深层海相碳酸盐岩储层地震预测关键技术与效果——以四川盆地震旦系-寒武系与塔里木盆地奥陶系油气藏为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 717-727.
[4]	陈槚俊, 何登发, 孙方源, 田方磊. 塔北隆起晚奥陶世—中泥盆世古隆起格局演变[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 285-298.
[5]	宁飞, 云金表, 李建交, 宋海明, 赵亮东. 塔里木盆地巴楚隆起西南缘构造特征与勘探前景[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 299-308.
[6]	易士威, 李明鹏, 范土芝, 杨帆, 方辉, 黄福喜, 金武弟. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷克拉苏和东秋断层上盘勘探突破方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 309-324.
[7]	张永, 郑孟林, 陈槚俊, 邓铭哲, 田方磊, 张伟康, 李英强. 塔里木盆地巴楚隆起玛扎塔格断裂带几何学与运动学特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 325-337.
[8]	王珂, 张荣虎, 王俊鹏, 孙雄伟, 杨学君. 超深层致密砂岩储层构造裂缝分布特征及其成因——以塔里木盆地库车前陆冲断带克深气田为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 338-353.
[9]	田方磊, 彭妙, 韩俊, 陈槚俊, 马德波, 毛丹凤. 塔里木盆地中部深层-超深层地震波组特征及其地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 354-369.
[10]	魏柳斌, 陈洪德, 郭玮, 严婷, 蔡郑红, 周黎霞. 鄂尔多斯盆地乌审旗-靖边古隆起对奥陶系盐下沉积与储层的控制作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 391-400, 521.
[11]	韩品龙, 肖敦清, 王居峰. 渤海湾盆地大港探区加里东期不整合面特征再认识[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 430-442.
[12]	张天付, 黄理力, 倪新锋, 熊冉, 杨果, 孟广仁, 郑剑锋, 陈薇. 塔里木盆地柯坪地区下寒武统吾松格尔组岩性组合及其成因和勘探意义——亚洲第一深井轮探1井突破的启示[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 928-940.
[13]	李慧莉, 李婧婧, 杨素举, 马中远. 塔里木盆地顺托果勒地区志留系成藏特征与勘探启示[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 941-952.
[14]	郭春涛, 宋海强, 梁洁, 倪玲梅. 塔东地区米兰1井寒武系白云岩成因及其对储层的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 953-964.
[15]	王斌, 赵永强, 何生, 郭小文, 曹自成, 邓尚, 吴鲜, 杨毅. 塔里木盆地顺北5号断裂带北段奥陶系油气成藏期次及其控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 965-974.