超深层碳酸盐岩层系硅质岩储层表征与评价——以塔里木盆地塔深6井为例

doi:10.11743/ogg20210302

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

塔里木盆地塔深6井揭示了奥陶系蓬莱坝组发育一定厚度的硅质岩储层，其储层发育特征与油气储集性能是当前研究焦点之一。基于岩性、电性响应特征，开展了详细的岩心观察描述、X衍射、显微岩石学分析和储集性能等储层表征与评价。分析结果表明，塔深6井硅质岩储层比同层系白云岩具有更高的孔隙度，超过7 400 m埋深下孔隙度平均值高达13.5%；主要由微晶石英组成，石英含量高达83.0%~93.7%，另有少量粘土、方解石和白云石等其他矿物。储集空间主要为石英晶间微孔隙，分布相对均一；孔隙直径多为1~10 μm，其次为0.1~1 μm，主要喉道直径为10~100 μm。原油加压饱和离线核磁共振实验研究表明，0.1~10 μm孔隙是硅质岩储层的主要储油空间，且总孔隙度越大可容纳的原油总量越大。塔深6井硅质岩储层与白云岩互层接触关系及与硅质结核的共生关系、显微层理结构特征、初始高孔隙度特征均表明其为沉积与成岩作用的共同产物，形成于台地内局部相对深水区。地震反射特征揭示储集体分布南北长约300 m、东西宽约200 m。硅质岩储层的发现对认识塔里木盆地早奥陶世碳酸盐岩台地内部结构差异性具有重要意义。

关键词: 核磁共振, 蓬莱坝组, 硅质岩储层, 超深层碳酸盐岩储层, 奥陶系, 塔里木盆地

Abstract:

Thick chert reservoirs were revealed by Well Tashen 6 penetrating the Ordovician Penglaiba Formation in the Tarim Basin and have been the focus of research for reservoir development characteristics and storage capacity. Based on lithology and electrical response characteristics, the reservoirs were studied with detailed core observation and description, X-ray diffraction, microscopic petrology analysis, reservoir performance and other reservoir characterization and evaluation methods. The results show that the reservoirs have higher porosity than dolostone reservoirs of the same sequence, with an average porosity as high as 13.5% at a burial depth of more than 7 400 m. The reservoirs are mainly composed of microcrystalline quartz, with a content as high as 83.0%-93.7%, and a small amount of clay, calcite, dolomite and other minerals. The reservoir space is relatively uniformly distributed intercrystalline micropores in quartz crystals with a pore diameter mainly varying from 1 to 10 μm, followed by 0.1-1 μm, and main throat diameter ranging from 10 to 100 μm. The off-line nuclear magnetic resonance of pressure saturated crude samples shows that pores of 0.1-10 μm in diameter serve as the main storage space. And the greater the total porosity, the greater the total amount of crude oil that can be accommodated. The interbedded siliceous-dolomite, the micro-bedding structure, the high initial porosity and the symbiotic siliceous nodules, all indicate that the reservoirs are the co-product of sedimentation and diagenesis in relatively deep water area on the platform. Furthermore, the seismic reflection characteristics reveal that the reservoir body is about 300 m long from north to south and 200 m wide from east to west. The discovery of siliceous rock reservoirs is of great significance to understanding the internal structural differences of the Early Ordovician carbonate platform in the Tarim Basin.

Key words: nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), Penglaiba Formation, chert reservoir, ultra-deep carbonate reservoir, Ordovician, Tarim Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

刘永立,尤东华,李海英,等. 超深层碳酸盐岩层系硅质岩储层表征与评价——以塔里木盆地塔深6井为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 547-556. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210302 Yongli Liu,Donghua You,Haiying Li,et al. Characterization and evaluation of chert reservoirs in ultra-deep carbonate rock formations-A case study on Well TS 6 in the Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(3): 547-556. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210302

图/表 14

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

图5

图6

表2

图7

图8

表3

图9

图10

图11

参考文献 21

1	Rogers S M . Deposition and diagenesis of Mississippian Chat Reservoirs, North-Central Oklahoma[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85 (1): 115- 129.
2	Bramlette M N . The Monterey Formation of California and the origin of its siliceous rocks[M]. Washington: US Government Printing Office, 1946: 1- 24.
3	Reid S A , Mclntyre J L . Monterey Formation porcelanite reservoirs of the Elk Hills field, Kern County, California[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85 (1): 169- 189.
4	Kolodny Y . Petology of siliceous rocks in the Mishash Formation[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1969, 39 (1): 166- 175.
5	Oehler J H . Origin and distribution of silica Lepispheres in porcelanite from the Monterey Formation of California[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1975, 45 (1): 252- 257.
6	Cady S L , Wenk H R , Downing K H . HRTEM of microcrystalline opal in chert and porcelanite from the Monterey Formation, California[J]. American Mineralogist, 1996, 81 (11): 1380- 1395.
7	Chaika C , Williams L A . Density and mineralogy variations as a function of porosity in Miocene Monterey Formation oil and gas reservoirs in California[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85 (1): 149- 167.
8	Saller A H , Horn D V , Miller J A , et al. Reservoir geology of Devonian carbonates and chert -Implications for Tertiary recovery, Dollarhide Field, Andrews County, Texas[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1991, 75 (1): 86- 107.
9	Ruppel S C , Hovorka S D . Controls on reservoir development in Devonian Chert: Permian Basin, Texas[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1995, 79 (12): 1757- 1785.
10	Montgomery S L . Thirtyone Formation, Permian Basin, Texas: Structural and lithologic heterogeneity in a Lower Devonian chert reservoir[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1998, 82 (1): 1- 24.
11	Saller A , Ball B , Robertson S , et al. Reservoir characteristics of Devonian cherts and their control on oil recovery: Dollarhide field, west Texas[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85 (1): 35- 50.
12	Ruppel S C , Barnaby R J . Contrasting styles of reservoir development in proximal and distal chert facies: Devonian Thirtyone Formation, Texas[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85 (1): 7- 33.
13	刘永立, 尤东华, 高利君, 等. 塔河油田塔深6井蓬莱坝组硅质岩成因及其地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (1): 83- 91.
	Liu Yongli , You Donghua , Gao Lijun , et al. Genesis and geological significance of siliceous rock in Penglaiba Formation in Well Tashen 6, Tahe oilfield[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (1): 83- 91.
14	蔡习尧, 钱一雄, 陈跃, 等. 塔中地区中、下奥陶统划分与对比[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2007, 28 (3): 292- 295. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3873.2007.03.010
	Cai Xiyao , Qian Yixiong , Chen Yue , et al. Division and correlation of Middle-Lower Ordovician in Tazhong area, Tarim Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2007, 28 (3): 292- 295. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3873.2007.03.010
15	Trotter J A , Williams I S , Barnes C R , et al. Did cooling oceans trigger Ordovician biodiversification? Evidence from conodont thermometry[J]. Science, 2008, 321 (5888): 550- 554. doi: 10.1126/science.1155814
16	高志前, 樊太亮, 焦志峰, 等. 塔里木盆地寒武-奥陶系碳酸盐岩台地样式及其沉积响应特征[J]. 沉积学报, 2006, 24 (1): 19- 27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.2006.01.003
	Gao Zhiqian , Fan Tailiang , Jiao Zhifeng , et al. The structural types and depositional characteristics of carbonate platform in the Cambrian-Ordovician of Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2006, 24 (1): 19- 27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.2006.01.003
17	何治亮, 彭守涛, 张涛. 塔里木盆地塔河地区奥陶系储层形成的控制因素与复合-联合成因机制[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31 (6): 743- 752.
	He Zhiliang , Peng Shoutao , Zhang Tao . Controlling factors and genetic pattern of the Ordovician reservoirs in the Tahe area, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2010, 31 (6): 743- 752.
18	Murata K J , Larson R R . Diagenesis of Miocene siliceous shales, Temblor Range, California[J]. U.S.Geological Survey Journal of Research, 1975, 3 (5): 553- 566.
19	Graham S A , Williams L A . Tectonic, depositional, and diagenetic history of Monterey Formation (Miocene), central San Joaquin Basin, California[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1985, 69 (3): 385- 411.
20	You Donghua , Han Jun , Hu Wenxuan , et al. Characteristics and formation mechanisms of silicified carbonate reservoirs in Well SN4 of the Tarim Basin[J]. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 2018, 36 (4): 820- 849.
21	Packard J J , Al-Aasm I , Samson Iain , et al. A Devonian hydrothermal chert reservoir: The 225 bcf Parkland field, British Columbia, Canada[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85 (1): 51- 84.

样品号	矿物含量/%
样品号	粘土	石英	方解石	白云石	黄铁矿	其他矿物
TS6-2-1	5.2	84.9	7.8	0.6	0.9	0.6
TS6-2-2	7.8	85.2	5.6	0.1	0.7	0.6
TS6-14-1	9.0	86.7	3.2	0.5	—	0.6
TS6-14-2	4.4	93.7	0.4	0.5	0.7	0.3
1-5	4.8	83.0	10.1	0.1	1.8	0.2
2-1	3.3	91.8	3.7	0.5	0.5	0.2

样品号	总孔隙度/%	不同孔隙直径分布范围的孔隙体积占比/%
样品号	总孔隙度/%	< 0.1 μm	0.1~1 μm	1~10 μm	>10 μm
2-8	9.1	1.11	2.48	5.52	—
2-9-2	8.2	1.06	2.39	4.60	0.15
2-9-3	8.5	1.34	2.86	4.30	—
12	17.4	1.48	3.97	11.92	0.03
22	12.3	1.08	1.28	8.68	1.26
1	13.0	11.37(< 10 μm的孔隙体积占比)			1.63
24	12.8	9.84(< 10 μm的孔隙体积占比)			2.96

样品号	深度/m	岩性	孔隙度/%	渗透率/(10^-3 μm²)	备注
1	7 418.38	硅质岩(薄层)	13.0	0.05	井壁取心
2	7 418.68	硅质岩(薄层)	17.1	0.08	井壁取心
12	7 547.47	硅质岩(厚层)	17.4	0.13	井壁取心
13	7 548.00	硅质岩(厚层)	12.6	0.36	井壁取心
14	7 549.09	硅质岩(厚层)	12.3	—	井壁取心
16	7 554.19	硅质岩(厚层)	27.9	0.71	井壁取心
19	7 561.49	硅质岩(厚层)	11.0	0.03	井壁取心
21	7 571.48	硅质岩(厚层)	16.2	0.54	井壁取心
22	7 576.71	硅质岩(厚层)	12.3	0.09	井壁取心
24	7 592.65	硅质岩(厚层)	12.8	0.66	井壁取心
25	7 603.85	硅质岩(厚层)	10.2	0.13	井壁取心
2-8	7 442.60	硅质岩(薄层)	9.1	0.02	岩心
2-9-2	7 442.70	硅质岩(薄层)	8.2	0.02	岩心
2-9-3	7 442.75	硅质岩(薄层)	8.5	0.01	岩心
5	7 432.48	白云岩	4.5	0.01	井壁取心
9	7 491.18	白云岩	3.0	0.02	井壁取心
28	7 268.79	白云岩	1.6	0.09	井壁取心
29	7 716.48	白云岩	5.3	0.03	井壁取心
2-9-4	7 442.80	白云岩	1.3	0	岩心
2-9-5	7 442.85	白云岩	1.0	0	岩心

[1]	方锐, 蒋裕强, 杨长城, 邓海波, 蒋婵, 洪海涛, 唐松, 谷一凡, 朱讯, 孙莎莎, 蔡光银. 四川盆地侏罗系凉高山组不同岩性组合页岩油赋存状态及可动性[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 752-769.
[2]	韩鹏远, 丁文龙, 杨德彬, 张娟, 马海陇, 王生晖. 塔里木盆地塔河油田S80走滑断裂发育特征及其对奥陶系储层的控制作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 770-786.
[3]	张艳秋, 陈红汉, 王燮培, 王彭, 苏丹梅, 谢舟. 塔里木盆地富满油田走滑断裂带通源性评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 787-800.
[4]	丁文龙, 李云涛, 韩俊, 黄诚, 王来源, 孟庆修. 碳酸盐岩储层高精度构造应力场模拟与裂缝多参数分布预测方法及其应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 827-851.
[5]	曹自成, 云露, 漆立新, 李海英, 韩俊, 耿锋, 林波, 陈菁萍, 黄诚, 毛庆言. 塔里木盆地顺北地区顺北84X井超千米含油气重大发现及其意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 341-356.
[6]	杨德彬, 鲁新便, 鲍典, 曹飞, 汪彦, 王明, 谢润成. 塔里木盆地北部奥陶系海相碳酸盐岩断溶体油藏成因类型及特征再认识[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 357-366.
[7]	张长建, 杨德彬, 蒋林, 姜应兵, 昌琪, 马雪健. 塔里木盆地塔河北部“过溶蚀残留型”断溶体发育特征及其成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 367-383.
[8]	万俊雨, 朱建辉, 姚素平, 张毅, 李春堂, 张威, 姜海健, 王杰. 鄂尔多斯盆地中、东部奥陶系马家沟组成烃生物及烃源岩地球生物学评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 393-405.
[9]	江同文, 邓兴梁, 曹鹏, 常少英. 塔里木盆地富满断控破碎体油藏储集类型特征与注水替油效果[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 542-552.
[10]	牛月萌, 韩俊, 余一欣, 黄诚, 林波, 杨帆, 余浪, 陈俊宇. 塔里木盆地顺北西部地区火成岩侵入体发育特征及其与断裂耦合关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 231-242.
[11]	张三, 金强, 史今雄, 胡明毅, 段梦悦, 李永强, 张旭栋, 程付启. 塔北地区奥陶系地下河溶洞充填规律与储集性能[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1582-1594.
[12]	康志江, 张冬梅, 张振坤, 王睿奇, 姜文斌, 刘坤岩. 深层缝洞型油藏井间连通路径智能预测技术[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1290-1299.
[13]	胡伟, 徐婷, 杨阳, 伦增珉, 李宗宇, 康志江, 赵瑞明, 梅胜文. 塔里木盆地超深油气藏流体相行为变化特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 1044-1053.
[14]	张坦, 姚威, 赵永强, 周雨双, 黄继文, 范昕禹, 罗宇. 塔里木盆地巴麦地区石炭系卡拉沙依组年代标尺及地层剥蚀厚度精细计算[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 1054-1066.
[15]	刘天, 刘小平, 刘启东, 段宏亮, 刘世丽, 孙彪, 化祖献. 陆相页岩游离油定量表征及其影响因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 910-922.