四川盆地新场构造带上三叠统须家河组二段地层水化学动态特征及其成因

doi:10.11743/ogg20210406

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

四川盆地新场构造带须家河组二段（须二段）地层水化学特征复杂，矿化度分布范围广，部分井在生产过程中地层水化学特征发生动态变化。因此，利用矿化度、氯镁系数、变质系数和诺瓦克相图等分析了须家河组各层段地层水化学特征，探讨了地层水的动态运移。结果显示：须二段地层水矿化度主要集中在70~110 g/L，氯镁系数大于50，变质系数大于10；须四段地层水矿化度主要集中在50~90 g/L，氯镁系数小于50，变质系数小于10；两者诺瓦克相图也具有明显差异。上述特征可作为地层水分布层系判别指标。须二段大部分井在生产过程中水化学特征较为稳定，表明地层水来源较为一致，以同层水为主；部分井如新856井、新2井、新10-1H井和新5井在生产过程中地层水化学特征发生了显著变化，根据判别指标，其地层水来源发生了变化。新2井和新856井在汶川地震后均有高矿化度、高溴离子浓度雷口坡组海相地层水混入；新10-1H井和新5井在生产过程中有须四段地层水进入，断层可能为地层水的跨层运移提供了通道。

关键词: 氯镁系数, 变质系数, 矿化度, 诺瓦克相图, 地层水动态变化, 须家河组, 四川盆地

Abstract:

Formation water from the second member of Xujiahe Formation, Xinchang structural belt, Sichuan Basin, is chemically complicated and highly variable in salinity, with some wells recording dynamic changes of chemical characteristics of produced waters.This paper discusses the migration of formation water based on a thorough analysis of the chemical characteristics of formation water from each interval of the Xujiahe Formation by using salinity data, chlorine/magnesiumionic ratios, metamorphism coefficients, Novák's phase diagrams and etc. The results show that the formation water of the second member has salinity values ranging between 70 and 110 g/L, chlorine/magnesium ionic ratios greater than 50 and metamorphic coefficients greater than 10; and that of the fourth member has salinity values ranging between 50 and 90 g/L, chlorine/magnesium ionic ratios less than 50 and metamorphism coefficients less than 10.Their Novak's phase diagrams also have obvious differences.These characteristics can be used to determine the stratigraphic origins of formation waters.The produced water from most wells in the second member show relatively stable chemical characteristics, indicating that the waters are sourced from the same stratigraphic interval. However, the produced water from some wells, such as Xin 856, Xin 2, Xin 10-1H and Xin 5, show significant variation of chemical characteristics. Judging by the graphs, the waters are multi-sourced. Alien waters of high salinity and high bromide ion concentration from marine Leikoupo Formation had been detected in wells Xin 2 and Xin 856 after Wenchuan Earthquake. Waters from the fourth member were also observed in wells Xin 10-1H and Xin 5.It is suggested that faults are the most likely pathways for this cross-layer migration of formation water.

Key words: chlorine/agnesium ratio, metamorphism coefficient, salinity, Novák's phase diagram, formation water dynamic change, Xujiahe Formation, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号:

TE133

楼章华,苏一哲,朱蓉,等. 四川盆地新场构造带上三叠统须家河组二段地层水化学动态特征及其成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(4): 841-851. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210406 Zhanghua Lou,Yizhe Su,Rong Zhu,et al. Dynamic chemical characteristics and origin of formation water in the second member of Xujiahe Formation, Xinchang structural belt, Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(4): 841-851. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210406

图/表 8

图1

图2

表1

图3

图4

表2

图5

图6

参考文献 37

1	汪虎, 何治亮, 张永贵, 等. 四川盆地海相页岩储层微裂缝类型及其对储层物性影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (1): 41- 49.
	Wang Hu , He Zhiliang , Zhang Yonggui , et al. Microfracture types of marine shale reservoir of Sichuan Basin and its influence on reservoir property[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (1): 41- 49.
2	吕文雅, 苗凤彬, 张本键, 等. 四川盆地剑阁地区须家河组致密砾岩储层裂缝特征及对天然气产能的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (3): 484- 491.
	Lyu Wenya , Miao Fengbin , Zhang Benjian , et al. Fracture characteristics and their influence on natural gas production: A case study of the tight conglomerate reservoir in the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Jian'ge area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (3): 484- 491.
3	唐自成, 钟大康, 王威, 等. 川东北元坝地区须家河组三段钙屑砂岩孔隙类型及地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (5): 1115- 1125.
	Tang Zicheng , Zhong Dakang , Wang Wei , et al. Pore types and geological significance of calcarenaceous sandstones in the 3rd member of Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba area, Northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (5): 1115- 1125.
4	胡东风, 王良军, 黄仁春, 等. 四川盆地中国石化探区油气勘探历程与启示[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42 (3): 283- 290.
	Hu Dongfeng , Wang Liangjun , Huang Renchun , et al. Petroleum exploration history and enlightenment in Sichuan Basin: A case study on Sinopec Exploration Areas[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42 (3): 283- 290.
5	何登发, 孙方源, 翟咏荷, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西缘石沟驿向斜的形成演化与致密砂岩气成藏模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42 (2): 370- 390.
	He Dengfa , Sun Fangyuan , Zhai Yonghe , et al. Syncline development and tight sandstone gas accumulation model in Shigouyi area at western margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42 (2): 370- 390.
6	李进步, 李娅, 张吉, 等. 苏里格气田西南部致密砂岩气藏资源评价方法及评价参数的影响因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (4): 730- 743.
	Li Jinbu , Li Ya , Zhang Ji , et al. Mingming.Resource evaluation method and influence factors of its parameters for tight sand gas reservoir in southwestern Sulige gas field[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (4): 730- 743.
7	唐大海, 谭秀成, 王小娟, 等. 四川盆地须家河组致密气藏成藏要素及有利区带评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2020, 27 (3): 40- 46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2020.03.007
	Tang Dahai , Tan Xiucheng , Wang Xiaojuan , et al. Tight gas accumulation elements and favorable zone evaluation of Xujiahe Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Specail Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2020, 27 (3): 40- 46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2020.03.007
8	林建力, 张宪国, 林承焰, 等. 岩相约束下的深层致密砂岩气藏储层演化特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (4): 886- 899.
	Lin Jianli , Zhang Xianguo , Lin Chengyan , et al. Diagenetic evolution characteristics constrained by lithofacies in deep tight sand gas reservoir[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (4): 886- 899.
9	陈朝兵, 杨友运, 邵金辉, 等. 鄂尔多斯东北部致密砂岩气藏地层水成因及分布规律[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (2): 313- 325.
	Chen Zhaobing , Yang Youyun , Shao Jinhui , et al. Origin and distribution of formation water in tight sandstone reservoirs in the northeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (2): 313- 325.
10	李蒙, 商晓飞, 赵华伟, 等. 基于likelihood地震属性的致密气藏断裂预测——以四川盆地川西坳陷新场地区须二段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (6): 1299- 1309.
	Li Meng , Shang Xiaofei , Zhao Huawei , et al. Prediction of fractures in tight gas reservoirs based on likelihood attribute-A case study of the 2nd member of Xujiahe Formation in Xinchang area, Western Sichuan Depression, Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (6): 1299- 1309.
11	宫亚军, 沈忠民, 刘四兵, 等. 川西坳陷新场地区须家河组地层水的地化特征研究[J]. 四川地质学报, 2010, 30 (1): 72- 74. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0995.2010.01.019
	Gong Yajun , Shen Zhongmin , Liu sibing , et al. Geochemical characteristics of formation water of Xujiahe Formation in Xinchang area of Western Sichuan depression[J]. Sichuan Journal of Geology, 2010, 30 (1): 72- 74. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0995.2010.01.019
12	陈冬霞, 庞雄奇, 李林涛, 等. 川西坳陷中段上三叠统须二段气水分布特征及成因机理[J]. 现代地质, 2010, 24 (6): 1117- 1125. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8527.2010.06.013
	Chen Dongxia , Pang Xiongqi , Li Lintao , et al. Gas water distribution characteristics and genetic mechanism of Upper Triassic Xu2 member in the middle section of Western Sichuan depression[J]. Modern geology, 2010, 24 (6): 1117- 1125. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8527.2010.06.013
13	吴小奇, 罗开平, 王萍, 等. 川西坳陷新场气田须家河组五段流体赋存状态[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38 (6): 1068- 1078.
	Wu Xiaoqi , Luo Kaiping , Wang Ping , et al. Fluid occurrence state of the fifth member of Xujiahe Formation in Xinchang gas field of Western Sichuan depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38 (6): 1068- 1078.
14	刘四兵, 沈忠民, 刘昊年, 等. 川西坳陷中段上三叠统须家河组水岩相互作用机制[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34 (1): 47- 58.
	Liu sibing , Shen Zhongmin , Liu Haonian , et al. Water rock interaction mechanism of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in the middle section of Western Sichuan depression[J]. Acta petrologicaSinica, 2013, 34 (1): 47- 58.
15	林耀庭, 何金权, 赵泽君. 诺瓦克水化学系数在川中地区上三叠统气田(卤)水产层判别的应用及意义[J]. 四川地质学报(3): 146-148.
	Lin Yaoting, HeJinquan, ZhaoZejun. Theapplication and significance of novak hydrochemical coefficient in the identification of Upper Triassic gas field (brine) aquatic Layers in Central Sichuan[J]. Journal of Sichuan Geology(3): 146-148.
16	李天宇, 靳军, 田英, 等. 准噶尔盆地西北缘地层水化学特征及与油气保存关系[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42 (6): 972- 980.
	Li Tianyu , Jin Jun , Tian Ying , et al. Chemical characteristics of formation water and the relationship with oil and gas preservation on northwestern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42 (6): 972- 980.
17	邓虎成, 周文, 周秋媚, 等. 新场气田须二气藏天然裂缝有效性定量表征方法及应用[J]. 岩石学报, 2013, 29 (3): 1087- 1097.
	Deng Hucheng , Zhou Wen , Zhou Qiumei , et al. Quantitative characterization method and application of natural fracture effectiveness in Xu2 gas reservoir, Xinchang gas field[J]. Acta petrologicaSinica, 2013, 29 (3): 1087- 1097.
18	邓宾, 何宇, 黄家强, 等. 前陆盆地形成与演化砂箱物理模拟启示——以四川盆地西部龙门山为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42 (2): 401- 415.
	Deng Bin , He Yu , Huang Jiaqiang , et al. Analogue modeling insights to foreland basin growth: A case study on the Longmenshan thrust belt in western Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42 (2): 401- 415.
19	李国蓉, 刘正中, 谢子潇, 等. 四川盆地西部雷口坡组非热液成因鞍形白云石的发现及意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (1): 164- 176.
	Li Guorong , Liu Zhengzhong , Xie Zixiao , et al. Discovery of non-hydrothermal saddle-shaped dolomite in Leikoupo Formation, Western Sichuan Basin and its significance[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (1): 164- 176.
20	周凌方, 钱一雄, 宋晓波, 等. 四川盆地西部彭州气田中三叠统雷口坡组四段上亚段白云岩孔隙表征、分布及成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (1): 177- 188.
	Zhou Lingfang , Qian Yixiong , Song Xiaobo , et al. Characteristics, distribution and origin of dolomite reservoir in the upper Lei 4 member of the Middle Triassic, Pengzhou gas field, western Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (1): 177- 188.
21	孔强夫, 杨才, 李浩, 等. 基于图论聚类和最小临近算法的岩性识别方法——以四川盆地西部雷口坡组碳酸盐岩储层为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (4): 884- 890.
	Kong Qiangfu , Yang Cai , Li Hao , et al. A lithology recognition method based on multi-resolution graph-based clustering and K-Nearest Neighbor: A case study from the Leikoupo Formation carbonate reservoirs in western Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (4): 884- 890.
22	Tokunaga T , Mogi K , Matsubara O . Buoyancy and Interfacial Force Effects on Two-Phase Displacement Patterns: An Experimental Study[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2000, 84 (1): 65- 74.
23	曾溅辉, 金之钧. 油气二次运移和聚集物理模拟[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2000.
	Zeng tanhui , Jin Zhijun . Physical simulation of secondary migration and accumulation of oil and gas[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2000.
24	王睿婧. 新场气田须四气藏气水分布特征研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2012.
	Wang Ruijing. Study on gas water distribution characteristics of xusi gas reservoir in Xinchang gas field[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of technology, 2012.
25	舒志国, 周林, 李雄, 等. 四川盆地东部复兴地区侏罗系自流井组东岳庙段陆相页岩凝析气藏地质特征及勘探开发前景[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42 (1): 212- 223.
	Shu Zhiguo , Zhou Lin , Li Xiong , et al. Geological characteristics of gas condensate reservoirs and their exploration and development prospect in the Jurassic continental shale of the Dongyuemiao Member of Ziliujing Formation, Fuxing area, eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42 (1): 212- 223.
26	薛永安, 王奇, 牛成民, 等. 渤海海域渤中凹陷渤中19-6深层潜山凝析气藏的充注成藏过程[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (5): 891- 902.
	Xue Yong'an , Wang Qi , Niu Chengmin , et al. Hydrocarbon charging and accumulation of BZ 19-6 gas condensate field in deep buried hills of Bozhong Depression, Bohai Sea[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (5): 891- 902.
27	胡安文, 王德英, 于海波, 等. 渤海湾盆地渤中19-6凝析气田天然气成因及油气成因关系判识[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (5): 903- 912.
	Hu Anwen , Wang Deying , Yu Haibo , et al. Genesis of natural gas and genetic relationship between the gas and associated condensate in Bozhong 19-6 gas condensate field, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (5): 903- 912.
28	赵永胜, 周文. 川西坳陷须二气藏凝析水地球化学特征及成因初探[J]. 天然气地球科学, 1995, (1): 30- 33.
	Zhao Yongsheng , Zhou Wen . Geochemical characteristics and origin of condensate water in Xu'er gas reservoir in West Sichuan Depression[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 1995, (1): 30- 33.
29	刘林玉, 柳益群, 李文厚, 等. 碳酸盐岩气藏出水特征分析——以华北油田苏4气藏为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2004, (3): 324- 327+332. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2004.03.017
	Liu Linyu , Liu Yiqun , Li Wenhou , et al. Analysis of water production characteristics of carbonate gas reservoirs——Taking the Su 4 gas reservoir of Huabei Oilfield as an example[J]. Oil& Gas Geology, 2004, (3): 324- 327+332. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2004.03.017
30	庞河清, 匡建超, 罗桂滨, 等. 川西新场气田须二气藏水体动态分布与水化学特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23 (1): 190- 197.
	Pang Heqing , Kuang Jianchao , Luo Guibin , et al. Water dynamic distribution and hydrochemical characteristics of Xu2 gas reservoir in Xinchang gas field, Western Sichuan[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23 (1): 190- 197.
31	Liu Shan , QiShihua , LuoZhaohui , et al. The origin of high hydrocarbon groundwater in shallow aquifer: experimental evidences from water-rock interaction[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2019, 26 (31): 32574- 32588. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06578-w
32	Yu H T , Ma T , Du Y , et al. Genesis of formation water in the northern sedimentary basin of South China Sea: Clues from hydrochemistry and stable isotopes (D, 18 O, 37 Cl and 81 Br)[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2018, 57- 65.
33	Irén Varsányi , Lajos ó. Kovács . Origin, chemical and isotopic evolution of formation water in geopressured zones in the Pannonian Basin, Hungary[J]. Chemical Geology, 2009, 264 (1-4): 187- 196. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.03.006
34	Li H, Cai C. Origin and evolution of formation water from the Ordovician carbonate reservoir in the Tazhong area, Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, 2016: S0920410516306088.
35	Pang J , Pang Z , Lv M . Geochemical and isotopic characteristics of fluids in the Niutuozhen geothermal field, North China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2018, 77 (1): 12. doi: 10.1007/s12665-017-7171-y
36	Novak S A , Eckstein Y . Hydrochemical Characterization of Brines and Identification of Brine Contamination in Aquifersa[J]. Groundwater, 1988, 26, 317- 324. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1988.tb00395.x
37	邓莉, 刘君龙, 钱玉贵, 等. 川西地区龙门山前带侏罗系物源与沉积体系演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (2): 380- 391.
	Deng Li , Liu Junlong , Qian Yugui , et al. Provenance and sedimentary system of the Jurassic successions in the front of Longmen Mountain in western Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (2): 380- 391.

地层	井名	水样数量/个	矿化度/ (g·L^-1)			氯镁系数			变质系数
地层	井名	水样数量/个	最小值	最大值	平均值	最小值	最大值	平均值	最小值	最大值	平均值
T₂x²	新209	2	64.94	69.43	67.19	103.49	111.33	107.42	13.05	14.45	13.76
	川合100	13	72.27	96.07	86.41	121.70	339.89	204.05	9.23	27.45	17.30
	川合127	9	71.60	114.60	88.47	50.72	105.52	88.58	9.00	41.24	20.80
	新11	2	83.17	105.05	94.11	95.86	114.48	105.16	5.23	12.57	8.90
	新501	4	84.01	111.00	95.58	79.48	123.10	92.59	12.20	26.13	17.10
	新202	14	94.84	103.04	99.06	45.43	107.14	74.26	6.92	18.22	9.70
	新853	17	100.30	112.17	104.23	27.66	127.48	73.64	2.58	19.99	9.99
	新101	1	104.37	104.37	104.37	70.17	70.17	70.17	12.73	12.73	12.73
	新301	24	100.66	113.89	107.05	62.80	95.78	80.83	5.68	15.25	10.96
	新3	20	83.60	116.35	107.66	33.33	88.18	58.39	6.03	19.65	10.73
	新201	20	109.11	121.19	116.78	64.98	78.61	71.41	7.56	12.97	10.06
	川孝560	4	114.73	120.03	117.33	43.05	51.96	47.24	9.37	12.22	10.80
T₂x⁴	新882	26	48.04	51.77	50.22	23.46	35.31	29.03	6.96	9.54	8.36
	川丰563	4	45.17	58.57	53.82	11.39	41.48	24.69	2.28	6.07	3.66
	川孝560	4	58.59	60.11	59.36	26.90	35.61	31.26	6.24	7.93	7.14
	新203	2	59.79	66.38	63.09	35.02	37.42	36.23	7.70	8.37	8.04
	新11	2	50.96	81.41	66.19	35.02	37.42	36.23	6.85	8.73	7.80
	联116	2	66.88	70.06	68.47	24.65	30.32	27.48	6.37	6.79	6.59
	新场22	13	60.11	76.13	69.77	27.44	39.44	35.39	3.84	9.15	7.49
	新22	5	74.86	76.56	75.72	35.81	35.87	35.84	7.29	7.61	7.45
	新21-1H	15	70.79	80.00	77.93	28.11	35.18	32.37	4.41	8.51	6.85
	新884	9	85.84	89.91	87.77	28.36	31.19	29.92	7.26	8.98	7.92
	新21-4HC1	3	88.87	94.63	91.76	25.07	25.28	25.18	4.39	4.40	4.40

井号	采样时间	水样数量/个	矿化度/(g·L^-1)	F^-含量/(mg·L^-1)	Br^-含量/(mg·L^-1)	诺瓦克相图
新856	2007/3/15—2008/4/2	10	90.03~101.02	0	0
新856	2008/6/17	1	160.00	11.10	1 445.00
新856	2008/7/9	1	120.06	22.20	1 422.20
新856	2008/7/16—2014/4/24	55	94.77~108.52	0	0
新2	2008/4/2	1	105.98	0	0
新2	2008/5/30	1	165.00	11.90	1 370.00
新2	2008/7/9	1	120.00	11.80	1 125.00
新2	2008/7/23—2019/3/20	39	102.83~114.31	0	0

[1]	方锐, 蒋裕强, 杨长城, 邓海波, 蒋婵, 洪海涛, 唐松, 谷一凡, 朱讯, 孙莎莎, 蔡光银. 四川盆地侏罗系凉高山组不同岩性组合页岩油赋存状态及可动性[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 752-769.
[2]	何骁, 郑马嘉, 刘勇, 赵群, 石学文, 姜振学, 吴伟, 伍亚, 宁诗坦, 唐相路, 刘达东. 四川盆地“槽-隆”控制下的寒武系筇竹寺组页岩储层特征及其差异性成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 420-439.
[3]	张赫驿, 杨帅, 张玺华, 彭瀚霖, 李乾, 陈聪, 高兆龙, 陈安清. 川东地区中二叠统茅口组沉积微相与环境演变[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 457-470.
[4]	潘辉, 蒋裕强, 朱讯, 邓海波, 宋林珂, 王占磊, 李杪, 周亚东, 冯林杰, 袁永亮, 王猛. 河流相致密砂岩气地质甜点评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 471-485.
[5]	张宝收, 张本健, 汪华, 陈践发, 刘凯旋, 豆霜, 戴鑫, 陈双玲. 四川盆地金秋气田：一个典型以中生界沉积岩为氦源岩的含氦-富氦气田[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 185-199.
[6]	张自力, 乔艳萍, 豆霜, 李堃宇, 钟原, 武鲁亚, 张宝收, 戴鑫, 金鑫, 王斌, 宋金民. 四川盆地蓬莱气区震旦系灯影组二段岩溶古地貌与控储模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 200-214.
[7]	王光付, 李凤霞, 王海波, 周彤, 张亚雄, 王濡岳, 李宁, 陈昱辛, 熊晓菲. 四川盆地不同类型页岩气压裂难点和对策[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1378-1392.
[8]	胡宗全, 王濡岳, 路菁, 冯动军, 刘粤蛟, 申宝剑, 刘忠宝, 王冠平, 何建华. 陆相页岩及其夹层储集特征对比与差异演化模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1393-1404.
[9]	王红岩, 周尚文, 赵群, 施振生, 刘德勋, 焦鹏飞. 川南地区深层页岩气富集特征、勘探开发进展及展望[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1430-1441.
[10]	边瑞康, 孙川翔, 聂海宽, 刘珠江, 杜伟, 李沛, 王濡岳. 四川盆地东南部五峰组-龙马溪组深层页岩气藏类型、特征及勘探方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1515-1529.
[11]	李双建, 李智, 张磊, 李英强, 孟宪武, 王海军. 四川盆地川西坳陷三叠系盐下超深层油气成藏条件与勘探方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1555-1567.
[12]	曾溅辉, 张亚雄, 张在振, 乔俊程, 王茂云, 陈冬霞, 姚泾利, 丁景辰, 熊亮, 刘亚洲, 赵伟波, 任克博. 致密砂岩气藏复杂气-水关系形成和分布主控因素及分布模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1067-1083.
[13]	刘昇, 范存辉, 张本健, 张亚, 王尉, 罗冰, 白晓亮. 四川盆地东部中二叠统茅口组孤峰段展布特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 993-1008.
[14]	吴冬, 邓虎成, 熊亮, 曹凯旋, 董晓霞, 赵勇, 魏力民, 王同, 马若龙. 四川盆地及其周缘下寒武统麦地坪组-筇竹寺组层序充填和演化模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(3): 764-777.
[15]	王濡岳, 胡宗全, 赖富强, 刘粤蛟, 邬忠虎, 何建华, 邹冠贵, 王鹏威, 李治昊. 川东北地区下侏罗统自流井组大安寨段陆相页岩脆性特征及其控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(2): 366-378.