石油与天然气地质 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 804-822.doi: 10.11743/ogg20220406
王胜军1(), 唐永亮1, 朱松柏1, 谢伟1, 单长安2(), 聂延波1, 王勇1, 王益民1, 蒋国军1, 邵剑波1, 叶璁琛2
收稿日期:
2021-12-27
修回日期:
2022-05-16
出版日期:
2022-07-14
发布日期:
2022-07-14
通讯作者:
单长安
E-mail:wangsj-tlm@petrochina.com.cn;shanca@xsyu.edu.cn
第一作者简介:
王胜军(1985-),男,高级工程师,超深油气藏地质。E?mail: 基金项目:
Shengjun Wang1(), Yongliang Tang1, Songbai Zhu1, Wei Xie1, Changan Shan2(), Yanbo Nie1, Yong Wang1, Yimin Wang1, Guojun Jiang1, Jianbo Shao1, Congchen Ye2
Received:
2021-12-27
Revised:
2022-05-16
Online:
2022-07-14
Published:
2022-07-14
Contact:
Changan Shan
E-mail:wangsj-tlm@petrochina.com.cn;shanca@xsyu.edu.cn
摘要:
基于丰富的野外露头实测资料,并结合地表自然伽马测量、元素(Fe,Ca,Mg,B)分析及井下数据,对塔里木盆地库车坳陷北部露头剖面白垩系巴什基奇克组三段层序地层特征进行了系统研究。结果表明,巴什基奇克组三段发育3个特征明显的岩性段,其下部为两期厚层褐灰色中、细砂岩-棕褐色厚层泥岩旋回;中部为大套厚层褐色、褐灰色粉砂岩、细砂岩夹薄层红褐色泥岩;上部为褐灰色粉砂岩、细砂岩与红褐色泥岩互层。地表自然伽马值范围为5 ~ 40 API,以齿化钟形和箱形夹齿化平直段为主,这些曲线形态可以较好地与井下进行对比。Fe3+和Fe2+含量、Ca/Mg含量比及B元素含量在剖面上的变化趋势表明地层旋回特征十分明显,巴什基奇克组古水体经历了浅—深—浅—深—浅—深—浅的变化过程。巴什基奇克组三段长周期旋回界面在野外露头区易于识别对比,根据露头岩性、颜色和层理构造等特征可识别出“向上变深的非对称”和“向上变深再变浅的近对称”两种短期基准面旋回叠加样式,结合自然伽马曲线特征和元素分析可以明确中期旋回。基于此方法,露头剖面巴什基奇克组三段可划分为3个中期旋回(四级层序),6个短期旋回(五级层序),部分剖面缺少1个短期旋回。与更加靠近湖盆中心的钻井相比,露头区往往少发育1个中期旋回和4个短期旋回。露头区MSC1,MSC2与MSC3中期旋回分别对应于井下MSC2,MSC3和MSC4中期旋回,其砂体与泥岩隔夹层具有较为相似的规律。研究成果有利于库车坳陷北部气区优质储层的追踪对比和预测,可以高效指导深层天然气的勘探开发。
中图分类号:
表2
库车坳陷北部露头区Ⅱ-1剖面巴什基奇克组三段微量元素特征"
样品编号 | 岩性 | 微量元素含量 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fe3+/% | Fe2+/% | Fe2+/Fe3+ | CaO/% | MgO/% | Ca/Mg | B/10-6 | ||
Ⅱ-1-YS1 | 灰色含砾细砂岩 | 1.31 | 0.61 | 0.47 | 5.10 | 0.91 | 5.6 | 36.6 |
Ⅱ-1-YS2 | 青灰色板状层理细砂岩 | 1.26 | 1.03 | 0.82 | 8.09 | 1.40 | 5.8 | 43.9 |
Ⅱ-1-YS3 | 青灰色板状层理中砂岩 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 15.81 | 1.14 | 13.9 | 27.2 |
Ⅱ-1-YS4 | 红褐色波纹层理泥质粉砂岩 | 0.91 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 19.58 | 1.08 | 18.1 | 25.7 |
Ⅱ-1-YS5 | 青灰色槽状层理细砂岩 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.93 | 25.46 | 0.88 | 29.0 | 22.9 |
Ⅱ-1-YS6 | 褐灰色平行层理粉砂岩 | 1.52 | 0.89 | 0.59 | 5.57 | 1.69 | 3.3 | 39.8 |
Ⅱ-1-YS7 | 褐灰色平行层理粉砂岩 | 1.40 | 0.57 | 0.41 | 12.07 | 1.46 | 8.3 | 31.6 |
Ⅱ-1-YS8 | 青灰色板状层理细砂岩 | 1.16 | 0.63 | 0.54 | 12.42 | 1.43 | 8.7 | 25.2 |
Ⅱ-1-YS9 | 褐灰色平行层理粉砂岩 | 1.89 | 0.96 | 0.51 | 3.09 | 2.06 | 1.5 | 42.5 |
Ⅱ-1-YS10 | 青灰色平行层理细砂岩 | 1.46 | 1.73 | 1.18 | 9.53 | 1.90 | 5.0 | 41.2 |
Ⅱ-1-YS11 | 褐灰色平行层理粉砂岩 | 1.40 | 0.99 | 0.71 | 4.16 | 1.52 | 2.7 | 34.3 |
Ⅱ-1-YS12 | 青灰色含砾中砂岩 | 1.09 | 0.86 | 0.79 | 10.49 | 1.06 | 9.9 | 29.4 |
1 | 朱光有, 池林贤, 张志遥, 等. 塔里木盆地大北气田凝析油中分子化合物组成与成因[J].石油勘探与开发, 2019,46(3):482-495. |
Zhu Youguang, Chi Linxian, Zhang Zhiyao, et al. Composition and genesis of molecular compounds in condensate from Dabei Gas Field, Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(3): 482-495. | |
2 | 苏洲, 张慧芳, 韩剑发, 等. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷中、新生界高蜡凝析油和轻质油形成及其控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(6): 1255-1269. |
Su Zhou, Zhang Huifang, Han Jianfa, et al. Formation and controlling factors of high wax condensate and light oil of Middle and Cenozoic in Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geolo‑ gy, 2018, 39(6): 1255-1269. | |
3 | 李鹭光. 中国天然气工业发展回顾与前景展望[J]. 天然气工业, 2021,41(8): 1-11. |
Li Luguang. Review and prospect of natural gas industry development in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(8): 1-11. | |
4 | 张博, 李江海, 吴世萍, 等. 大北气田储层裂缝定量描述[J]. 天然气地球科学,2010, 21(1): 42-46. |
Zhang Bo, Li Jianghai, Wu Shiping,et al. Quantitative characteri‑ zation of reservoir fractures in Dabei Gas field[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2010, 21(1): 42-46. | |
5 | 马涛, 马青, 王振宇, 等. 库车坳陷古近系原型沉积盆地层序地层格架及沉积演化[J]. 地质科学, 2020, 55(2): 369-381. |
Ma Tao, Ma Qing, Wang Zhenyu,et al. Sequence stratigraphic framework and sedimentary evolution of paleogene prototype sedimentary basin in Kuqa Depression[J]. Geological Science, 2020, 55(2): 369-381. | |
6 | 李勇, 漆家福, 师俊, 等. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷中生代盆地性状及成因分析[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2017, 41(5): 829-842. |
Li Yong, Qi Jiafu, Shi Jun, et al. Characteristics and genesis of Mesozoic basin in Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin[J]. Tectonics and Metallogeny, 2017, 41(5): 829-842. | |
7 | 何治亮, 高山林, 郑孟林. 中国西北地区沉积盆地发育的区域构造格局与演化[J]. 地学前缘, 2015, 22(3): 227-240. |
He Zhiliang, Gao Shanlin, Zhen Menglin. Regional tectonic pattern and evolution of sedimentary basins in northwest China [J]. Geoscience Frontiers, 2015, 22(3): 227-240. | |
8 | Ning Fei, Yun Jinbiao, Zhang Zhongpei, et al. Deformation patterns and hydrocarbon potential related to intracratonic strike‑slip fault systems in the east of Central Uplift Belt in the Tarim Basin [J]. Energy Geoscience, 2022(1): 63-72. |
9 | 赖锦, 王贵文, 柴毓, 等. 库车坳陷白垩系巴什基奇克组成岩层序地层特征[J]. 沉积学报, 2015, 33(2): 394-407. |
Lai Jin, Wang Guiwen, Cai Yu, et al. Characteristics of sequence stratigraphy of Cretaceous Bashijiqike formation in Kuqa De‑ pression [J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2015, 33(2): 394- 407. | |
10 | 毕征峰, 薛明喜, 潘广山, 等. 塔里木盆地白垩系三级层序划分、展布特征及充填模式[J].科学技术与工程, 2017, 17(22): 51-56. |
Bi Zhengfeng, Xue Mingxi, Pan Guangshan, et al. Division, distribution and filling model of tertiary Cretaceous sequence in Tarim Basin[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2017, 17(22): 51-56. | |
11 | 杨兴业, 王家豪. 库车坳陷北部白垩系露头层序地层分析[J]. 新疆石油天然气, 2008, 4(4): 15-21+5. |
Yang Xingye, Wang Jiahao. Sequence stratigraphy analysis of Cretaceous outcrop in northern Kuqa Depression[J]. Xinjiang Oil and Natural Gas, 2008, 4(4): 15-21+5. | |
12 | 梅冥相, 于炳松, 靳卫广. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷白垩纪层序地层格架及古地理演化[J]. 古地理学报, 2004,6(3): 261-278. |
Mei Mingxiang, Yu Bingsong, Jin Weiguang. Cretaceous sequence stratigraphic framework and paleogeographic evolution in Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2004, 6(3): 261-278. | |
13 | 林畅松, 王清华, 肖建新, 等. 库车坳陷白垩纪沉积层序构成及充填响应模式[J]. 中国科学(D辑:地球科学), 2004, 34(S1):74-82. |
Lin Changsong, Wang Qinghua, Xiao Jianxin, et al. Sedimentary sequence composition and filling response model of cretaceous in Kuqa Depression[J]. Science in China Series (D: Earth Scien⁃ces), 2004,34(S1):74-82. | |
14 | 胡涛, 张柏桥, 舒志国. 库车坳陷白垩系一个扇三角洲准层序的结构特征[J]. 矿物岩石, 2003,23(2): 87-89. |
Hu Tao, Zhang Baiqiao, Shu Zhiguo. Structural characteristics of a fan delta parasequence in the Cretaceous of Kuqa Depression[J]. Mineral Rocks, 2003,23(2): 87-89. | |
15 | 贾进华, 薛良清. 库车坳陷中生界陆相层序地层格架与盆地演化[J]. 地质科学, 2002,37(S1): 121-128+140. |
Jia Jinhua, Xue Liangqing. Mesozoic continental sequence stratigraphic framework and basin evolution in Kuqa Depression[J]. Scientia Geologica Sinica, 2002,37(S1): 121-128+140. | |
16 | 肖建新, 林畅松, 刘景颜. 塔里木盆地北部库车坳陷白垩系层序地层与体系域特征[J]. 地球学报, 2002,23(5): 453-458. |
Xiao Jianxin, Lin Changsong, Liu Jingyan. Sequence stratigraphy and system tract characteristics of Cretaceous in Kuqa Depression, northern Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2002,23(5): 453-458. | |
17 | 夏文军, 张柏桥, 舒志国, 等. 库车坳陷巴什基奇克组露头储层层次分析[J]. 江汉石油学院学报, 2004,26(3): 8-10. |
Xia Wenjun, Zhang Baiqiao, Shu Zhiguo, et al. Reservoir hierarchy analysis of bashijiqike Formation outcrop in Kuqa Depression[J]. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute, 2004,26(3): 8-10. | |
18 | 林畅松, 郑和荣, 任建业, 等. 渤海湾盆地东营、沾化凹陷早第三纪同沉积断裂作用对沉积充填的控制[J]. 中国科学(D辑:地球科学), 2003,33(11): 1025-1036. |
Lin Changsong, Zheng Herong, Ren Jianye, et al. Control of sedimentary filling by eogene synsedimentary faulting in Dongying and Zhanhua depressions, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Science in China Series (D: Earth Sciences), 2003,33(11): 1025-1036. | |
19 | 王珂, 杨海军, 张惠良, 等. 超深层致密砂岩储层构造裂缝特征与有效性——以塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深8气藏为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(4): 719-729. |
Wang Ke, Yang Haijun, Zhang Huiliang, et al. Characteristics and effectiveness of structural fractures in ultra‑deep tight sandstone reservoirs: A case study of Keshen 8 gas reservoir in Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(4): 719-729. | |
20 | 曾庆鲁, 莫涛, 赵继龙, 等. 7000 m以深优质砂岩储层的特征、成因机制及油气勘探意义——以库车坳陷下白垩统巴什基奇克组为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(1): 38-47. |
Zeng Qinglu, Mo Tao, Zhao Jilong, et al. Characteristics, genetic mechanism and petroleum exploration significance of deep high⁃quality sandstone reservoir at 7 000 m: A case study of Lower Cretaceous Bashijiqike Formation in Kuqa Depression[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(1): 38-47. | |
21 | 田军, 杨海军, 吴超, 等. 博孜9井的发现与塔里木盆地超深层天然气勘探潜力[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(1): 11-19. |
Tian Jun, Yang Haijun, Wu Cao, et al. Discovery of Well Bozi 9 and exploration potential of ultra‑deep natural gas in Tarim Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(1):11-19. | |
22 | Amodu Adeniyi, Oluwaseye Peter Oyetade, Suyi Lawrence Fadi⁃ya,et al. Sequence stratigraphic analysis and hydrocarbon prospectivity of AMO Field, deep offshore Niger Delta, Nigeria[J].Ene‑ rgy Geoscience, 2022, 3 (1): 80-93. |
23 | 杜威, 纪友亮, 季梦瑶, 等. 渤海湾盆地饶阳凹陷早渐新世高精度年代地层格架建立及意义[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2021,44(4):142-151. |
Du Wei, Ji Youliang, Ji Mengyao, et al. Establishment and significance of high‑resolution Early Oligocene chronostratigraphic framework in Raoyang Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2021, 44(4):142-151. | |
24 | 陈发景, 汪新文.中国西北地区早-中侏罗世盆地原型分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2000,7(4): 459-469. |
Chen Fajing, Wang Xinwen. Prototype analysis of early‑middle Jurassic Basin in northwest China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2000,7(4): 459-469. | |
25 | 曹守连, 陈发景. 塔里木板块北缘前陆盆地的构造演化及其与油气的关系[J]. 地球科学, 1994,19(4): 482-492. |
Cao Shoulian, Chen Fajing. Tectonic evolution of foreland basin in the northern margin of Tarim Plate and its relation to oil and gas[J]. Earth Science, 1994,19(4): 482-492. | |
26 | 丁道桂, 刘伟新, 崔可锐, 等. 塔里木中新生代前陆盆地构造分析与油气领域[J]. 石油实验地质, 1997,19(2): 97-105+107. |
Ding Daogui, Liu Weixin, Cui Kerui, et al. Structural analysis and hydrocarbon domain of Meso‑Cenozoic Tarim foreland basin[J]. Petroleum Geology Experiment, 1997,19(2): 97-105+107. | |
27 | 何文渊, 李江海, 钱祥麟, 等. 塔里木盆地北部隆起负反转构造成因机制探讨[J]. 地质科学, 2001,36(2): 234-240. |
He Wenyuan, Li Jianghai, Qian Xianglin, et al. Discussion on genesis mechanism of negative inversion structure in northern Tarim Basin uplift[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2001,36(2): 234-240. | |
28 | 贾进华, 薛良清. 库车坳陷中生界陆相层序地层格架与盆地演化[J]. 地质科学, 2002,37(S1): 121-128+140. |
Jia Jinhua, Xue Liangqing. Mesozoic continental sequence stratigraphic framework and basin evolution in Kuqa Depression[J]. Scientia Geologica Sinica, 2002,37(S1): 121-128+140. | |
29 | 崔泽宏, 王志欣, 汤良杰. 塔北隆起北部叠加断裂构造特征与成因背景分析[J]. 中国地质, 2005,32(3): 378-385. |
Cui Zehong, Wang Zhixin, Tang Liangjie. Tectonic characteristics and genetic background analysis of superimposed faults in northern Tabei Uplift[J]. Geology in China, 2005,32(3): 378- | |
385 | |
30 | 王家豪, 王华, 陈红汉, 等. 前陆盆地的构造演化及其沉积、地层响应——以库车坳陷下白垩统为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2007, 14(4): 114-122. |
Wang Jiahao, Wang Hua, Chen Hongjiang, et al. Tectonic evolution and sedimentary and stratigraphic responses of foreland basins: A case study of the Lower Cretaceous in Kuqa Depression[J]. Geoscience frontiers, 2007,14(4): 114-122. | |
31 | 刘志宏, 卢华复, 李西建, 等. 库车再生前陆盆地的构造演化[J]. 地质科学, 2000,35(4): 482-492. |
Liu Zhihong, Lu Huafu, Li Xijian, et al. Tectonic evolution of kuqa foreland basin[J]. Geological Sciences, 2000,35(4):482- | |
492 | |
32 | 贾承造, 陈汉林, 杨树锋, 等. 库车坳陷晚白垩世隆升过程及其地质响应[J]. 石油学报, 2003,24(3): 1-5+15. |
Jia Chengzao, Chen Hanlin, Yang Shufeng, et al. Study on the uplift process and geological response of the Late Cretaceous in Kuqa Depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2003,24(3): 1-5+15. | |
33 | 阎福礼, 卢华复, 贾东, 等. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷中、新生代沉降特征探讨[J]. 南京大学学报(自然科学版), 2003,39(1):31-39. |
Yan Fuli, Lu Huafu, Jia Dong, et al. Characteristics of Mesozoic and Cenozoic subsidence in Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Nanjing University (Natural Science), 2003,39(1): 31-39. | |
34 | 李本亮, 魏国齐, 贾承造. 中国前陆盆地构造地质特征综述与油气勘探[J]. 地学前缘, 2009, 16(4): 190-202. |
Li Benliang, Wei Guoqi, Jia Chengzao. Tectonic geological charac‑ teristics and petroleum exploration of Foreland basins in China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2009, 16(4): 190-202. | |
35 | 张惠良, 张荣虎, 杨海军, 等. 构造裂缝发育型砂岩储层定量评价方法及应用——以库车前陆盆地白垩系为例[J]. 岩石学报, 2012, 28(3): 827-835. |
Zhang Huiliang, Zhang Ronghu, Yang Haijun, et al. Quantitative evaluation method and application of tectonically fractured sandstone reservoir: A case study of Cretaceous in Kuqa foreland Basin [J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2012, 28(3): 827-835. | |
36 | 张荣虎, 贾承造, 张惠良, 等. 塔里木盆地白垩系巴什基奇克组陆相砂岩中碳酸盐岩碎屑特征及其地质意义[J]. 沉积学报, 2009, 27(3): 410-418. |
Zhang Ronghu, Jia Chengzao, Zhang Huiliang, et al. Detrital characteristics and geological significance of carbonate rocks in cretaceous Bashijiqike Formation continental sandstone, Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2009, 27(3): 410-418. | |
37 | 韩登林, 李忠, 韩银学, 等. 库车坳陷克拉苏构造带白垩系砂岩埋藏成岩环境的封闭性及其胶结作用分异特征[J]. 岩石学报, 2009, 25(10): 2351-2362. |
Han Denglin, Li Zhong, Han Yinxue, et al. Sealing and cementation differentiation of Cretaceous sandstone burial diagenetic environment in Kelasu tectonic belt, Kuqa Depression[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2009, 25(10): 2351-2362. | |
38 | 贾进华. 库车前陆盆地白垩纪巴什基奇克组沉积层序与储层研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2000,7(3): 133-143. |
Jia Jinhua. Sedimentary sequence and reservoir characteristics of Cretaceous Bashijiqike Formation in Kuqa foreland Basin[J]. Geoscience Frontiers, 2000,7(3): 133-143. | |
39 | 顾家裕. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷白垩纪层序地层格架.塔里木盆地沉积层序特征及其演化[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1996: 274-276. |
Gu Jiayu. Depositional Sequence Characteristicsand Evolution in Tarim Basin[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1996: 274- | |
276 | |
40 | 朱玉新, 郭庆银, 邵新军, 等. 新疆塔里木盆地库车坳陷北缘白垩系储层沉积相研究[J]. 古地理学报, 2000, 2(4): 58-65. |
Zhu Yuxin, Guo Qingyin, Shao Xinjun, et al. Study on reservoir sedimentary facies of the Cretaceous in the north of Kuqa Depression, Tarim basin, Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography,2000, 2(4): 58-65. | |
41 | 易艳, 张泽楷, 崔小虎, 等. 大北气田白垩系致密裂缝性储集层压力敏感特征[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019, 40(3): 340-343. |
Yi Yan, Zhang Zekai, Cui Xiaohu, et al. Pressure sensitive chara‑ cteristics of cretaceous tight fractured reservoirs in Dabei Gas Field [J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(3): 340-343. | |
42 | 田景春, 陈高武, 张翔, 等. 沉积地球化学在层序地层分析中的应用[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2006(1): 30-35. |
Tian Jingchun, Chen Gaowu, Zhang Xiang, et al. Application of sedimentary geochemistry in sequence stratigraphy analysis[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Natural Science), 2006(1): 30-35. | |
43 | 邓宏文, 钱凯. 沉积地球化学与环境分析[M]. 兰州: 甘肃科学技术出版社, 1993: 4-28. |
Deng Hongwen, Qian Kai. Sedimentary geochemistry and environmental analysis[M]. Lanzhou: Gansu Science and Technology Press, 1993: 4-28. | |
44 | 张祥玉, 李守军, 赵秀丽, 等. Ca/Mg比值对古环境的指示意义及其影响因素[J]. 山东科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 36(3): 9-16. |
Zhang Xiangyu, Li Shoujun, Zhao Xiuli, et al. The significance of Ca/Mg ratio to paleo‑environment and its influencing factors [J]. Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 36(3): 9-16. | |
45 | 明承栋, 侯读杰, 赵省民, 等. 内蒙古东部索伦地区中二叠世哲斯组古环境与海平面相对升降的地球化学记录[J]. 地质学报, 2015, 89(8): 1484-1494. |
Ming Chengdong, Hou Dujie, Zhao Xingmin,et al .The geochemistry records of paleoenvironment and sea‑level relative movement of Middle Permian Zhesi Formation in Eastern Inner Mongolia[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2015, 89(8): 1484- 1494. |
[1] | 韩鹏远, 丁文龙, 杨德彬, 张娟, 马海陇, 王生晖. 塔里木盆地塔河油田S80走滑断裂发育特征及其对奥陶系储层的控制作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 770-786. |
[2] | 张艳秋, 陈红汉, 王燮培, 王彭, 苏丹梅, 谢舟. 塔里木盆地富满油田走滑断裂带通源性评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 787-800. |
[3] | 丁文龙, 李云涛, 韩俊, 黄诚, 王来源, 孟庆修. 碳酸盐岩储层高精度构造应力场模拟与裂缝多参数分布预测方法及其应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 827-851. |
[4] | 曹自成, 云露, 漆立新, 李海英, 韩俊, 耿锋, 林波, 陈菁萍, 黄诚, 毛庆言. 塔里木盆地顺北地区顺北84X井超千米含油气重大发现及其意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 341-356. |
[5] | 杨德彬, 鲁新便, 鲍典, 曹飞, 汪彦, 王明, 谢润成. 塔里木盆地北部奥陶系海相碳酸盐岩断溶体油藏成因类型及特征再认识[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 357-366. |
[6] | 张长建, 杨德彬, 蒋林, 姜应兵, 昌琪, 马雪健. 塔里木盆地塔河北部“过溶蚀残留型”断溶体发育特征及其成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 367-383. |
[7] | 江同文, 邓兴梁, 曹鹏, 常少英. 塔里木盆地富满断控破碎体油藏储集类型特征与注水替油效果[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 542-552. |
[8] | 牛月萌, 韩俊, 余一欣, 黄诚, 林波, 杨帆, 余浪, 陈俊宇. 塔里木盆地顺北西部地区火成岩侵入体发育特征及其与断裂耦合关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 231-242. |
[9] | 张三, 金强, 史今雄, 胡明毅, 段梦悦, 李永强, 张旭栋, 程付启. 塔北地区奥陶系地下河溶洞充填规律与储集性能[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1582-1594. |
[10] | 高志勇, 吴永平, 刘兆龙, 魏聪, 张永忠, 王翠丽, 刘群明. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷中秋1井区白垩系巴什基奇克组砂质辫状河有利岩相组合发育模式与意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1141-1158. |
[11] | 康志江, 张冬梅, 张振坤, 王睿奇, 姜文斌, 刘坤岩. 深层缝洞型油藏井间连通路径智能预测技术[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1290-1299. |
[12] | 胡伟, 徐婷, 杨阳, 伦增珉, 李宗宇, 康志江, 赵瑞明, 梅胜文. 塔里木盆地超深油气藏流体相行为变化特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 1044-1053. |
[13] | 张坦, 姚威, 赵永强, 周雨双, 黄继文, 范昕禹, 罗宇. 塔里木盆地巴麦地区石炭系卡拉沙依组年代标尺及地层剥蚀厚度精细计算[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 1054-1066. |
[14] | 郭宏辉, 冯建伟, 赵力彬. 塔里木盆地博孜—大北地区被动走滑构造特征及其对裂缝发育的控制作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 962-975. |
[15] | 李斌, 赵星星, 邬光辉, 韩剑发, 关宝珠, 沈春光. 塔里木盆地塔中Ⅱ区奥陶系油气差异富集模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(2): 308-320. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||