页岩油探井现场地质评价实验流程与技术进展

doi:10.11743/ogg20190312

石油与天然气地质 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 571-582.doi: 10.11743/ogg20190312

页岩油探井现场地质评价实验流程与技术进展

蒋启贵^1,2,3,4, 黎茂稳^1,2,3,4, 钱门辉^1,2,3,4, 鲍云杰^1,2,3,4, 刘鹏^1,2,3,4, 陶国亮^1,2,3,4, 马晓潇¹, 李志明^1,2,3,4, 曹婷婷^1,2,3,4, 吴世强⁵

1. 中国石化石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所, 江苏无锡 214126;
2. 页岩油气富集机理与有效开发国家重点实验室, 江苏无锡 214126;
3. 国家能源页岩油研发中心, 北京, 100083;
4. 中国石化油气成藏重点实验室, 江苏无锡 214126;
5. 中国石化江汉油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 湖北武汉 430223

收稿日期:2019-01-03 修回日期:2019-03-26 出版日期:2019-06-28 发布日期:2019-04-26
第一作者简介:蒋启贵(1964-),男,博士、研究员,有机地球化学实验与应用。E-mail:qiguij2004@126.com。
基金项目:
国家科技重大专项（2017ZX05049001）。

Experimental procedures of well-site geological evaluation for shale oil and related technological progress

Jiang Qigui^1,2,3,4, Li Maowen^1,2,3,4, Qian Menhui^1,2,3,4, Bao Yunjie^1,2,3,4, Liu Peng^1,2,3,4, Tao Guoliang^1,2,3,4, Ma Xiaoxiao¹, Li Zhiming^1,2,3,4, Cao Tingting^1,2,3,4, Wu Shiqiang⁵

1. Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, SINOPEC, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China;
3. State Energy Center for Shale Oil Research and Development, Beijing 100083, China;
4. Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Mechanisms, SINOPEC, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China;
5. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Jianghan Oilfield Branch Company, SINOPEC, Wuhan, Hubei 430223, China

Received:2019-01-03 Revised:2019-03-26 Online:2019-06-28 Published:2019-04-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 页岩油勘探钻完井过程中需要及时对页岩含油性及页岩油的可动性进行快速评价，而已有的现场评价技术主要适用于常规砂岩储层，难于满足页岩非均质性描述的需求，迫切需要建立针对性的实验技术序列。根据页岩油探井现场快速地质评价客观需求，结合实验仪器的客观技术指标，提出了现场实验项目、取样保存和实验技术流程，并开展了现场技术方法实验和应用研究，研制磁流体变密度岩石总体积测试装置，解决了易松散形变页岩难于取柱塞样而无法及时获取物性参数的难题，建立了无固定形状页岩物性分析技术；采用液氮冷冻密闭粉碎制样技术避免轻烃损失，岩石热解分析数据更为真实；优化现场测试项目之间以及现场和实验室分析项目之间的衔接，实验支撑更为高效。新技术在江汉盆地潜江组、济阳坳陷沙河街组和鄂尔多斯盆地延长组七段应用效果显著，为陆相页岩油勘探快速地质评价提供了科学依据。同时也需要指出，中国目前页岩油勘探现场实验技术还不完善，还没有相应的规范标准，下一步攻关方向应该是，在完善现场实验技术和应用技术的基础上，形成规范的方法技术体系，搭建页岩油勘探快速地质评价技术平台。

关键词: 岩石热解, 实验流程, 测试技术, 现场实验, 快速地质评价, 页岩油

Abstract: In the drilling and completion process of a shale oil exploration well,it is necessary to evaluate the oil-bearing property and movability of shale oil in time.However,the existing well-site evaluation techniques are developed primarily for conventional sandstone reservoirs,thus cannot meet the requirements of shale heterogeneity description.Therefore,it is in urgent need to establish a specific experimental procedure for shale oil drilling.In accordance with the requirements of rapid well-site geological evaluation and the technical limitations of available instrumentations,we proposed item selection,sampling,sample preservation and technical workflow for on-site experiment.Furthermore,this workflow was tested and applied in several well-site operations.A magnetohydrodynamic variable density rock bulk volume testing device was developed to solve the problem that it is hard to rapidly measure physical properties due to the difficulty to sample plungers for shales prone to loose and deform.In addition,a technique was invented to analyze the physical properties of shales with no fixed geometry.In order to minimize the evaporative loss of light hydrocarbons and to make Rock-Eval pyrolysis analysis data more reliable,shale samples were ground in liquid nitrogen freezing instruments.Analytical programs for well-site and lab tests were optimized and synergized to ensure more efficient workflow.These new methods were applied successfully to the Qianjiang Formation in Jianghan Basin,Shahejie Formation in Jiyang Depression and Chang 7 in Ordos Basin,laying a sound foundation for fast geological evaluation of continental shale oil exploration.Meanwhile,what should be pointed out is that the current well-site experimental technology is still far from perfect for China's shale oil exploration,for instance,a lack of related specifications and criteria.What we should do further is to improve the existing well-site experimental and applied technologies,develop normative methodology and technology systems,and build a rapid geological evaluation platform for shale oil exploration.

Key words: Rock-Eval pyrolysis, experimental workflow, testing technique, well-site experiment, rapid geological evaluation, shale oil

中图分类号:

TE135

蒋启贵,黎茂稳,钱门辉,等. 页岩油探井现场地质评价实验流程与技术进展[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 571-582. doi: 10.11743/ogg20190312 Jiang Qigui,Li Maowen,Qian Menhui,et al. Experimental procedures of well-site geological evaluation for shale oil and related technological progress[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3): 571-582. doi: 10.11743/ogg20190312

参考文献

[1] 贾承造,郑民,张永峰.中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(2):129-136. Jia Chengzao,Zheng Min,Zhang Yongfeng.Unconventional hydrocarbon resources in China and the prospect of exploration and development[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(2):129-136.
[2] 卢双舫,薛海涛,王民,等.页岩油评价中的若干关键问题及研究趋势[J].石油学报,2016,37(10)：1309-1322. Lu Shuangfang,Xue Haitao,Wang Min,et al.Several key issues and research trends in evaluation of shale oil[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(10)：1309-1322.
[3] 邹才能,杨智,崔景伟,等.页岩油形成机制、地质特征及发展对策[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(1)：14-26. Zou Caineng,Yang Zhi,Cui Jingwei,et a1.Formation mechanism,geological characteristics and development strategy of nonmarine shale oil in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(1)：14-26.
[4] 盛湘,陈祥,章新文,等.中国陆相页岩油开发前景与挑战[J].石油实验地质,2015,37(3)：267-271. Sheng Xiang,Chen Xiang,Zhang Xinwen,et al.Prospects and challenges of continental shale oil developm ent in China[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2015,37(3)：267-271.
[5] 魏亚强,李国敏,董艳辉.三维激光扫描与气体置换联合测定岩石有效孔隙率[J].地质科技情报,2015,34(4)：212-216. Wei Yaqiang,Li Guoming,Dong Yanhui.Determinating Effective Porosity by the Combination of Three-Dimensional Laser Scanning and Gas Displacement[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2015,34(4)：212-216.
[6] Jansen J H F,Van der Gaast S J,Koster B,et al.CORTEX,a shipboard XRF-scanner for element analyses in split sediment cores[J].Marine Geology,1999,1151(1-4):143-153.
[7] Rimmer S M.Geochemical paleoredox indicators in Devonian—Missis—sippian black shales,Central Appalachian Basin(USA)[J].Chemical Geology,2004,206(3-4)：373-391.
[8] 牛强,曾溅辉,王鑫,等.X射线元素录井技术在胜利油区泥页岩脆性评价中的应用[J].油气地质与采收率,2014,21(1)：24-27. Niu Qiang,Zeng Jianhui，Wang Xin，et al.Application of X-ray element logging technology in brittleness evaluation of shale in Shengli Oil Region[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency，2014，21(1):24-27.
[9] Rowe H，Hughes N，Robinson K.The quantification and application of handheld energy—dispersive X-ray fluorescence(ED—XRF) in mudrock chemostratigraphy and geochemistry[J].Chemical Geology,2012,324-325：122-131.
[10] 马晓潇,黎茂稳,庞雄奇,等.手持式X荧光光谱仪在济阳坳陷古近系陆相页岩岩心分析中的应用[J].石油实验地质,2016,38(2)：278-286. Ma Xiaoxiao,Li Maowen,Pang Xiongqi,et al.Application of hand-held X·-ray fluorescence spectrometry in the core analysis of Paleogene lacustrine shales in the Jiyang Depression[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2016,38(2)：278-286.
[11] ORR W L.Changes in sulfur content and isotopic ratios of sulfur during petroleum maturation-Study of Big Horn Basin Palaeozoic oils[J].American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin,1974,50:2295-2318.
[12] Bo Barker J.Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed-the role ofsulphate reduction[J].Nature,1982,296:643-645.
[13] Machel H G,Krouse H R,Sassen R.Products and distinguishing criteria of bacterial and thermochemical sulfate reduction[J].Applied Geochemistry,1995,10(4)：373-389.
[14] 王志战.定量荧光录井技术应用研讨[J].录井技术,2002,13(1)：35-40. Wang Zhizhan.Application and discussion of quantitative fluorescence logging technology[J].Logging Technology,2002,13(1):35-40,2002，13(1)：35-40.
[15] 陈俊男.三维定量荧光录井技术探讨[J].录井工程，2005，16(2)：5-10. Chen Junnan.The application of 3 D quantitative fluorescence logging technology[J].Logging Engineering,2005,16(2)：5-10.
[16] 兰晶晶,熊亭,陈伟.三维定量荧光录井技术在渤海湾盆地A油田的应用[J].录井工程,2016,27(2):15-19. Lan Jingjing,Xiong Ting,Chen Wei.Application of three-dimensional quantitative fluorescence logging technology in A oilfield of Bohai Bay Basin[J].Logging Engineering,2016,27(2):15-19.
[17] Jarvie D M.Components and processes affecting producibility and commerciality of shale resource system[C]//International Symposium on Shale Oil Technologies.Wuxi ALAGO Special Publication,2012.
[18] 蒋启贵,黎茂稳,钱门辉,等.不同赋存状态页岩油定量表征技术与应用研究[J].石油实验地质,2016,38(6)：842-849. Jiang Qigui,Li Maowen，Qian Menhui，et al.Quantitative characterization of shale oil in different occurrence states and its application.Petroleum Geology & Experiment，2016，38(6)：842-849.
[19] 薛海涛,田善思,王伟明,等.页岩油资源评价关键参数——含油率的校正[J].石油与天然气地质，2016，37(1):15-22. Xue Haitao,Tian Shansi,Wang Weiming.et al.Correction of oil content—one key parameter in shale oil resource assessment[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2016,37(1):15-22.
[20] 李进步,卢双舫,陈国辉,等.热解参数S1的轻烃与重烃校正及其意义——以渤海湾盆地大民屯凹陷E2s4(2)段为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(4)：538-545. Li Jinbu,Lu Shuangfang,Chen Guohui,et al.Correction of light and heavy hydrocarbon loss for residual hydrocarbon S1 and its significance to assessing resource potential of E2s4(2)member in Damintun Sag，Bohai Bay Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology，2016，37(4)：538-545.
[21] Jarvie D M.Shale resource systems for oil and gas： Part 2-Shale-oil resource systems[C]//Shale reservoirs-Giant resources for the 21st century us:2012.
[22] Lopatin N V，Zubairaev S L，Kos I M，et al.Unconventional oil accumulations in the Upper Jurassic Bazhenov black shale formation,West Siberian Basin:A self-sourced reservoir system[J].Journal of Petroleum Geology,2003,26(2):225-44.
[23] Chen Z,Li M,Cao T,et al.Hydrocarbon generation kinetics of a heterogeneous source rock system:-Example from the Eocene-Oligocene Shahejie Formation,Bohai Bay Basin in eastern China[J].Energy & Fuels,2017,31(12)13291-13304.
[24] Li M,Chen Z,Cao T,et al.Expelled oils and their impacts on Rock-Eval data interpretation,Eocene Qianjiang Formation in Jianghan Basin,China[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2018,191,37-48.
[25] Chen Z,Li M,Ma X,et al.Generation kinetics based method for correcting effects of migrated oil on Rock-Eval data-an example from the Eocene Qianjiang Formation,Jianghan Basin,China[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2018,195,84-101.
[26] Li M,Chen Z,Ma X,et al.A numerical method for calculating total oil yield using a single routine Rock-Eval pyrogram,a case study of the Eocene Shahejie Formation in Dongying Depression,Bohai Bay Basin,China[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2018,191,49-65.
[27] Li M,Chen Z,Ma X,et al.Shale oil resource potential and oil mobility characteristics of the Eocene-Oligocene Shahejie Formation,Jiyang Super-Depression,Bohai Bay Basin of China[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2019,204:130-143.
[28] 马晓潇,黎茂稳,蒋启贵,等.陆相页岩含油性的化学动力学定量评价方法.油气地质与采收率,2019,26(1),137-152. Ma,Xiaoxiao,Li Maowen,Jiang Qigui,et al.Chemical kinetic model for quantitative evaluation on oil-bearing property of lacustrine shale[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2019,26(1),137-152.
[29] Marshall A G,Rodgers R P.Petroleomics:Chemistry of the underworld[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,105,2008,18090-18095.
[30] Liu P,Li M,Jiang Q,et al.Effect of secondary oil migration distance on composition of acidic NSO compounds in crude oils determined by negative-ion electrospray Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry[J].Organic Geochemistry,2015,78:23-31.

页岩油探井现场地质评价实验流程与技术进展

Experimental procedures of well-site geological evaluation for shale oil and related technological progress

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘惠民, 包友书, 黎茂稳, 李政, 吴连波, 朱日房, 王大洋, 王鑫. 页岩油富集可动性地球化学评价参数探讨[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 622-636.
[2]	蒲秀刚, 董姜畅, 柴公权, 宋舜尧, 时战楠, 韩文中, 张伟, 解德录. 渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷古近系孔店组二段页岩高丰度有机质富集模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 696-709.
[3]	方锐, 蒋裕强, 杨长城, 邓海波, 蒋婵, 洪海涛, 唐松, 谷一凡, 朱讯, 孙莎莎, 蔡光银. 四川盆地侏罗系凉高山组不同岩性组合页岩油赋存状态及可动性[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 752-769.
[4]	李军, 邹友龙, 路菁. 陆相页岩油储层可动油含量测井评价方法[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 816-826.
[5]	杜晓宇, 金之钧, 曾联波, 刘国平, 杨森, 梁新平, 陆国青. 基于成像测井的深层陆相页岩油储层天然裂缝有效性评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 852-865.
[6]	赵喆, 白斌, 刘畅, 王岚, 周海燕, 刘羽汐. 中国石油陆上中-高成熟度页岩油勘探现状、进展与未来思考[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 327-340.
[7]	高和群, 高玉巧, 何希鹏, 聂军. 苏北盆地古近系阜宁组二段页岩油储层岩石力学特征及其控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 502-515.
[8]	郭旭升, 马晓潇, 黎茂稳, 钱门辉, 胡宗全. 陆相页岩油富集机理探讨[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1333-1349.
[9]	孙龙德, 王小军, 冯子辉, 邵红梅, 曾花森, 高波, 江航. 松辽盆地古龙页岩纳米孔缝形成机制与页岩油富集特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1350-1365.
[10]	米立军, 徐建永, 李威. 渤海海域页岩油资源潜力[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1366-1377.
[11]	刘惠民, 李政, 包友书, 张守春, 王伟庆, 吴连波, 王勇, 朱日房, 方正伟, 张顺, 刘鹏, 王敏. 渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷高产页岩油井BYP5页岩地质特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1405-1417.
[12]	王民, 余昌琦, 费俊胜, 李进步, 张宇辰, 言语, 吴艳, 董尚德, 唐育龙. 页岩油在干酪根中吸附行为的分子动力学模拟与启示[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1442-1452.
[13]	李志明, 刘雅慧, 何晋译, 孙中良, 冷筠滢, 李楚雄, 贾梦瑶, 徐二社, 刘鹏, 黎茂稳, 曹婷婷, 钱门辉, 朱峰. 陆相页岩油“甜点”段评价关键参数界限探讨[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1453-1467.
[14]	方志雄, 肖秋生, 张殿伟, 段宏亮. 苏北盆地陆相“断块型”页岩油地质特征及勘探实践[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1468-1478.
[15]	李明, 王民, 张金友, 张宇辰, 刘召, 雒斌, 卞从胜, 李进步, 王鑫, 赵信斌, 董尚德. 中国典型盆地陆相页岩油组分评价及意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1479-1498.