苏北地区早寒武世黑色页岩地球化学特征与有机质富集模式

doi:10.11743/ogg20200416

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

早寒武世期间沉积的一套富有机质页岩，沉积厚度大，有机质含量高，是目前华南地区海相页岩气勘探重要目标层系之一。以苏北地区XYZ-1为例，利用钻井岩心资料和地球化学测试分析数据，探讨早寒武世幕府山组黑色页岩的沉积环境及有机质富集模式研究。结果表明，XYZ-1井幕府山组为一套黑色、深灰色炭质页岩夹薄层状碳酸盐岩的沉积层序，顶部和底部发育有石煤层。幕府山组V/（Ni+V）平均值为0.74，Ni/Co的平均值为6.78，U/Th的平均值为1.46，V/Sc的平均值为65.43，氧化还原指标表明幕府山组整体为缺氧的沉积环境，在底部和顶部存在两次较为强烈的硫化事件。幕府山组炭质页岩的TOC平均值为5.62%，其中72.2%的样品大于2%，TOC与TS相关系数高达0.89。因此，缺氧的沉积条件为有机质的富集和保存提供了保障，硫化的沉积环境是有机质富集的关键因素，苏北地区幕府山组具备了发育良好烃源岩和储层的条件。

关键词: 有机质富集, 黑色页岩, 幕府山组, 早寒武世, 苏北地区

Abstract:

A set of black shale deposited in the Early Cambrian and characterized by a large thickness and high organic matter content is one of the important exploration target strata for marine shale gas in South China.The sedimentary environment and enrichment mechanism of organic matters in the black shale are discussed based on the core and geochemical data from Well XYZ-1 drilled through the Early Cambrian Mufushan Formation in northern Jiansu area.The Mufushan Formation in Well XYZ-1 is a set of depositional sequence of black and dark gray carbonaceous shale with stone coal layers on top and at bottom and interbeds of thin-layered carbonate rocks.The average values of V/(Ni+V), Ni/Co, U/Th, and V/Sc are 0.74, 6.78, 1.46, and 65.43, respectively.These ratios as indicators of redox environment suggest that the sediments were under anoxic conditions and two strong sulfidation events once occurred at the bottom and top.The average total organic carbon (TOC) content of the Mufushan carbonaceous shale is 5.62%, with the TOC value of 72.2% of the samples collected greater than 2%.The TOC-TS correlation coefficient is as high as 0.89.The hypoxic environment with sulfidation events provided favorable conditions for the enrichment and preservation of organic matters, thus laid down foundation for the development of high-quality source rocks and reservoirs in the Mufushan Formation of northern Jiansu.

Key words: enrichment of organic matter, black shale, Mufushan Formation, Early Cambrian, northern Jiangsu area

中图分类号:

TE135

张玉玺,陈建文,周江羽. 苏北地区早寒武世黑色页岩地球化学特征与有机质富集模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 838-851. doi: 10.11743/ogg20200416 Yuxi Zhang,Jianwen Chen,Jiangyu Zhou. Geochemical features and organic matter enrichment in the Early Cambrian black shale, northern Jiangsu area[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(4): 838-851. doi: 10.11743/ogg20200416

图/表 10

图1

表1

苏北地区XYZ-1井幕府山组黑色页岩主量元素含量"

层位	样品	有机碳和元素含量/%
层位	样品	TOC	SiO₂	Al₂O₃	CaO	Fe₂O₃	K₂O	MgO	MnO	Na₂O	P₂O₅	TiO₂
幕Ⅲ段	G1	8.74	53.05	9.45	9.36	4.56	3.35	1.77	0.03	0.01	0.19	0.50
	G2	7.08	51.49	4.24	17.80	1.63	1.70	1.42	0.02	0.01	0.09	0.21
	G3	10.68	48.20	5.12	13.89	1.66	2.09	4.11	0.03	0.01	0.19	0.26
	G4	10.60	65.09	2.12	11.15	1.71	0.79	0.93	0.02	0.01	0.31	0.11
幕Ⅱ段	G5	4.20	60.65	2.52	16.57	0.27	0.94	2.01	0.03	0.01	0.06	0.17
	G6	3.05	48.56	7.49	13.65	1.30	2.49	5.81	0.04	0.01	0.16	0.54
	G7	5.56	29.86	3.95	31.84	0.43	1.35	2.66	0.05	0.01	0.09	0.27
	G8	8.60	19.27	2.88	40.23	0.28	1.04	1.47	0.07	0.01	0.04	0.17
	G9	2.72	50.88	7.89	12.67	1.02	2.66	5.28	0.05	0.01	0.17	0.57
	G10	8.52	16.73	2.13	42.64	0.17	0.66	1.36	0.05	0.01	0.03	0.14
	G11	1.34	68.59	6.19	8.66	1.03	2.11	1.92	0.02	0.01	0.11	0.36
	G12	1.70	55.00	9.76	10.44	1.24	2.70	4.00	0.02	0.01	0.10	0.55
	G13	5.08	12.93	2.06	45.00	0.04	0.58	1.42	0.05	0.01	0.04	0.11
	G14	2.77	52.82	7.74	12.38	0.77	2.07	4.56	0.03	0.01	0.10	0.48
	G15	1.45	57.60	9.35	7.96	1.20	2.49	4.91	0.02	0.01	0.12	0.54
	G16	6.02	18.25	2.52	41.10	0.24	0.60	1.48	0.04	0.01	0.16	0.13
	G17	1.10	59.75	9.65	5.80	2.42	2.58	4.95	0.02	0.01	0.13	0.55
	G18	9.82	25.31	3.32	35.12	0.02	0.87	2.25	0.03	0.01	0.06	0.18
	G19	1.39	57.29	9.58	6.51	1.33	2.68	6.07	0.03	0.01	0.12	0.58
	G20	1.74	55.76	8.80	10.85	1.84	2.31	3.72	0.03	0.04	0.12	0.48
	G21	6.66	15.38	2.38	43.39	0.72	0.50	1.21	0.04	0.29	0.05	0.11
	G22	1.57	59.92	9.93	6.99	0.67	2.68	4.29	0.02	0.18	0.12	0.55
	G23	1.63	65.15	8.07	5.08	1.04	2.09	4.69	0.01	0.02	0.23	0.44
	G24	9.25	33.03	1.55	33.20	0.28	0.45	1.87	0.02	0.02	0.07	0.08
	G25	2.08	60.75	6.70	9.25	1.13	1.70	4.42	0.02	0.01	0.16	0.41
	G26	7.53	21.45	1.80	40.31	0.21	0.39	1.03	0.03	0.01	0.06	0.10
	G27	1.09	82.74	4.32	1.99	1.00	1.31	1.78	0.01	0.01	0.17	0.20
	G28	6.20	17.58	1.70	42.61	0.17	0.35	1.20	0.02	0.01	0.04	0.09
	G29	1.68	60.57	7.37	7.64	0.80	1.92	5.11	0.02	0.01	0.10	0.43
	G30	2.50	58.50	7.33	8.27	0.98	1.73	5.22	0.02	0.03	0.20	0.40
	G31	7.54	28.00	3.83	33.51	0.92	0.87	1.43	0.05	0.24	0.09	0.22
	G32	4.60	45.17	10.26	14.64	1.25	2.94	3.11	0.03	0.18	0.10	0.53
	G33	4.09	47.41	11.17	11.46	1.46	3.28	3.01	0.03	0.01	0.10	0.60
幕Ⅰ段	G34	2.66	51.37	15.68	0.44	4.55	7.63	1.74	0.01	0.06	0.15	0.56
	G35	21.27	39.93	9.52	4.48	3.44	5.25	2.43	0.01	0.01	0.22	0.41
	G36	19.99	31.67	8.65	8.23	2.41	3.30	2.37	0.00	0.01	1.39	0.42
平均值		5.62	45.16	6.31	18.48	1.23	2.01	2.97	0.03	0.04	0.16	0.35

表1

图2

表2

苏北地区XYZ-1井幕府山组黑色页岩稀土元素含量"

样品	稀土元素含量/10^-6																		ΣLREE/ ΣHREE	(La/ Yb)_N	(Gd/ Yb)_N	Y/Ho	δCe
样品	La	Ce	Pr	Nd	Sm	Eu	Gd	Tb	Dy	Ho	Er	Tm	Yb	Lu	Y	ΣREE	ΣLREE	ΣHREE	ΣLREE/ ΣHREE	(La/ Yb)_N	(Gd/ Yb)_N	Y/Ho	δCe
G1	26.20	47.80	5.88	22.10	3.96	0.71	3.39	0.46	3.00	0.59	1.80	0.30	1.95	0.28	18.60	118.42	106.65	11.77	9.06	9.06	1.40	31.53	0.93
G2	18.70	33.90	4.29	16.50	3.31	0.67	3.04	0.46	2.83	0.55	1.65	0.26	1.57	0.23	17.30	87.96	77.37	10.59	7.31	8.03	1.56	31.45	0.91
G3	19.10	35.00	4.39	16.90	3.32	0.64	3.09	0.45	2.88	0.59	1.69	0.26	1.71	0.25	19.70	90.27	79.35	10.92	7.27	7.53	1.46	33.39	0.92
G4	14.70	29.90	3.35	13.80	2.69	0.52	2.70	0.38	2.31	0.43	1.14	0.17	0.96	0.14	14.40	73.19	64.96	8.23	7.89	10.32	2.27	33.49	1.03
G5	24.50	33.10	3.84	12.60	1.69	0.29	1.28	0.17	1.03	0.19	0.56	0.09	0.56	0.09	5.80	79.99	76.02	3.97	19.15	29.50	1.84	30.42	0.82
G6	15.50	26.90	3.28	11.80	2.11	0.39	1.77	0.25	1.54	0.29	0.87	0.14	0.91	0.13	7.90	65.88	59.98	5.90	10.17	11.48	1.57	27.48	0.91
G7	13.70	22.60	2.86	10.60	1.89	0.42	1.77	0.25	1.60	0.32	0.90	0.14	0.95	0.13	8.90	58.13	52.07	6.06	8.59	9.72	1.50	27.81	0.87
G8	12.70	19.90	2.61	9.90	2.02	0.44	1.86	0.29	1.87	0.36	1.05	0.16	1.04	0.15	10.50	54.38	47.60	6.78	7.02	8.23	1.44	29.17	0.83
G9	20.00	34.10	4.25	15.60	2.59	0.47	2.13	0.29	1.88	0.35	1.11	0.19	1.19	0.19	9.70	84.34	77.01	7.33	10.51	11.33	1.44	27.74	0.89
G10	10.50	16.80	1.87	6.70	1.26	0.32	1.12	0.18	1.24	0.25	0.77	0.12	0.87	0.13	7.90	42.09	37.41	4.68	7.99	8.14	1.04	31.68	0.91
G11	13.90	22.80	2.99	11.00	1.86	0.34	1.65	0.22	1.21	0.25	0.73	0.11	0.71	0.11	7.00	57.88	52.89	4.99	10.60	13.20	1.88	28.08	0.85
G12	27.30	39.80	5.51	19.70	3.36	0.61	2.74	0.38	2.42	0.48	1.37	0.21	1.49	0.22	14.00	105.59	96.28	9.31	10.34	12.35	1.48	29.17	0.78
G13	12.70	18.30	2.46	9.50	1.78	0.50	1.63	0.26	1.62	0.31	0.83	0.14	0.82	0.11	9.60	51.04	45.32	5.72	7.92	10.44	1.60	31.19	0.79
G14	20.70	32.10	4.23	15.30	2.48	0.45	2.15	0.30	1.81	0.35	1.01	0.17	1.10	0.16	10.50	82.31	75.26	7.05	10.68	12.69	1.58	30.00	0.83
G15	22.10	34.10	4.51	16.50	2.65	0.44	2.10	0.30	1.79	0.34	0.99	0.16	1.00	0.15	10.30	87.13	80.30	6.83	11.76	14.90	1.69	30.29	0.82
G16	18.80	28.40	4.22	16.50	3.45	0.80	3.28	0.44	2.59	0.48	1.32	0.17	1.24	0.16	16.30	81.85	72.17	9.68	7.46	10.22	2.13	33.96	0.77
G17	25.60	39.40	5.25	18.90	3.04	0.43	2.19	0.31	1.86	0.36	1.06	0.18	1.21	0.17	9.90	99.96	92.62	7.34	12.62	14.26	1.46	27.50	0.82
G18	17.10	25.00	3.47	13.10	2.50	0.54	2.26	0.34	2.11	0.41	1.27	0.19	1.30	0.19	13.80	69.78	61.71	8.07	7.65	8.87	1.40	33.66	0.78
G19	23.40	36.40	4.87	17.90	2.82	0.44	2.28	0.32	2.08	0.40	1.19	0.18	1.30	0.17	12.40	93.75	85.83	7.92	10.84	12.14	1.42	31.00	0.82
G20	30.10	42.80	6.12	21.40	3.65	0.63	2.93	0.44	2.53	0.47	1.49	0.21	1.45	0.20	14.40	114.42	104.70	9.72	10.77	14.00	1.63	30.64	0.76
G21	17.50	22.80	3.24	11.70	2.37	0.57	2.35	0.36	2.30	0.45	1.42	0.22	1.47	0.18	17.50	66.93	58.18	8.75	6.65	8.03	1.29	38.89	0.73
G22	23.70	33.90	4.54	16.50	2.83	0.44	2.10	0.32	1.95	0.39	1.13	0.19	1.30	0.19	12.10	89.48	81.91	7.57	10.82	12.29	1.30	31.03	0.79
G23	20.10	31.10	3.87	13.30	2.05	0.24	1.60	0.19	1.29	0.23	0.66	0.10	0.71	0.11	7.00	75.55	70.66	4.89	14.45	19.09	1.82	30.74	0.85
G24	8.98	12.10	1.65	6.00	1.12	0.23	1.01	0.14	0.92	0.17	0.52	0.08	0.52	0.07	6.30	33.52	30.09	3.43	8.77	11.64	1.57	37.41	0.76
G25	17.90	27.10	3.58	12.30	1.99	0.34	1.72	0.25	1.41	0.27	0.78	0.12	0.82	0.11	8.90	68.69	63.21	5.48	11.53	14.72	1.69	33.30	0.81
G26	9.92	13.60	2.02	7.90	1.62	0.41	1.59	0.24	1.51	0.30	0.84	0.12	0.82	0.11	11.20	41.01	35.48	5.53	6.42	8.16	1.56	37.33	0.73
G27	8.55	16.10	1.96	7.40	1.25	0.14	0.98	0.13	0.72	0.13	0.33	0.05	0.38	0.05	3.50	38.24	35.47	2.77	12.81	15.17	2.08	27.31	0.95
G28	12.10	18.00	2.47	8.90	1.72	0.47	1.61	0.21	1.25	0.23	0.58	0.08	0.58	0.08	7.80	48.28	43.66	4.62	9.45	14.07	2.24	34.04	0.79
G29	15.30	24.50	2.96	10.10	1.49	0.20	1.13	0.17	1.03	0.20	0.60	0.10	0.67	0.10	5.50	58.55	54.55	4.00	13.64	15.40	1.36	27.70	0.88
G30	17.80	28.50	3.57	12.50	2.04	0.32	1.68	0.23	1.26	0.23	0.66	0.10	0.68	0.10	7.10	69.67	64.73	4.94	13.10	17.65	1.99	30.87	0.86
G31	23.80	32.90	4.74	17.50	3.17	0.73	3.08	0.41	2.45	0.46	1.26	0.19	1.14	0.17	16.40	92.00	82.84	9.16	9.04	14.08	2.18	35.65	0.75
G32	29.40	44.00	6.04	21.40	3.59	0.66	2.93	0.44	2.79	0.49	1.45	0.22	1.54	0.22	15.00	115.17	105.09	10.08	10.43	12.87	1.54	30.61	0.79
G33	27.10	38.80	5.43	18.30	3.34	0.65	2.94	0.43	2.53	0.48	1.42	0.22	1.47	0.20	14.50	103.31	93.62	9.69	9.66	12.43	1.61	30.21	0.77
G34	61.30	77.10	10.70	35.60	1.12	0.20	3.76	0.49	3.03	0.61	1.70	0.31	1.99	0.27	18.50	198.18	186.02	12.16	15.30	20.77	1.52	30.33	0.72
G35	51.00	46.90	12.10	52.10	9.37	1.53	13.70	1.99	13.40	3.10	9.91	1.60	10.80	1.64	120.00	229.14	173.00	56.14	3.08	3.18	1.02	38.71	0.45
G36	114.00	85.10	26.10	115.00	23.90	4.69	35.30	5.44	35.80	8.15	24.90	3.77	23.90	3.57	348.00	509.62	368.79	140.83	2.62	3.22	1.19	42.70	0.38

表2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

参考文献 49

1	郑和荣, 彭勇民, 唐建信, 等. 中、上扬子地区常压页岩气勘探前景——以湘中坳陷下寒武统为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (6): 1155- 1167.
	Zheng Herong , Peng Yongmin , Tang Jianxin , et al. Exploration prospect of normal-pressure shale gas in Middle and Upper Yangtze regions:A case study of the Lower Cambrian shale in Xiangzhong Depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (6): 1155- 1167.
2	刘计勇, 张飞燕, 印燕铃. 下扬子下寒武统岩相古地理及烃源岩条件研究[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2018, 38 (3): 85- 95.
	Liu Jiyong , Zhang Feiyan , Yin Yanling . Lithofacies and paleogeographic study on late Cambrian hydrocarbon source rocks in lower Yangtze region[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2018, 38 (3): 85- 95.
3	高波, 刘忠宝, 舒志国, 等. 中上扬子地区下寒武统页岩气储层特征及勘探方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (2): 284- 294.
	Gao Bo , Liu Zhongbao , Shu Zhiguo , et al. Reservoir characteristics and exploration of the Lower Cambrian shale gas in the Middle-Upper Yangtze area[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (2): 284- 294.
4	刘忠宝, 杜伟, 高波, 等. 层序格架中富有机质页岩发育模式及差异分布:以上扬子下寒武统为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48 (1): 1- 14.
	Liu Zhongbao , Du Wei , Gao Bo , et al. Sedimentary model and distribution of organic-rich shale in the sequence stratigraphic framework:a case study of lower Cambrian in upper Yangtze region[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48 (1): 1- 14.
5	龙胜祥, 曹艳, 朱杰, 等. 中国页岩气发展前景及相关问题初探[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37 (6): 847- 853.
	Long Shengxiang , Cao Yan , Zhu Jie , et al. A preliminary study on prospects for shale gas industry in China and relevant issues[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37 (6): 847- 853.
6	张焱林, 段轲, 刘早学, 等. 鄂西下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩特征及页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41 (5): 691- 698.
	Zhang Yanlin , Duan Ke , Liu Zaoxue , et al. Characteristics of shale and main controlling factors of shale gas enrichment of Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation in western Hubei[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41 (5): 691- 698.
7	李智武, 冉波, 肖斌, 等. 四川盆地北缘震旦纪-早寒武世隆-坳格局及其油气勘探意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26 (1): 59- 85.
	Li Zhiwu , Ran Bo , Xiao Bin , et al. Sinian to early Cambrian uplift-depression framework along the northern margin of the Sichuan Basin, central China and its implications for hydrocarbon exploration[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2019, 26 (1): 59- 85.
8	赵文智, 胡素云, 汪泽成, 等. 中国元古界-寒武系油气地质条件与勘探地位[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45 (1): 1- 13.
	Zhao Wenzhi , Hu Suyun , Wang Zecheng , et al. Petroleum geological conditions and exploration importance of Proterozoic to Cambrian in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45 (1): 1- 13.
9	贾智彬, 侯读杰, 孙德强, 等. 贵州地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组烃源岩热水沉积成因鉴别与强度评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39 (3): 429- 437.
	Jia Zhibin , Hou Dujie , Sun Deqiang , et al. Genesis and intensity of hydrothermal sedimentation in hydrocarbon source rocks in the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation, Guizhou area[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39 (3): 429- 437.
10	韩雨樾, 冉波, 李智武, 等. 四川盆地北缘下寒武统页岩生物标志化合物特征及其地质意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41 (3): 435- 442.
	Han Yuyue , Ran Bo , Li Zhiwu , et al. Characteristics of biomarker compounds and their implications for Lower Cambrian black shale on the northern margin of Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41 (3): 435- 442.
11	赵泽恒, 张桂权, 薛秀丽. 黔中隆起下组合古油藏和残余油气藏[J]. 天然气工业, 2008, 28 (8): 39- 42.
	Zhao Zeheng , Zhang Guiquan , Xue Xiuli . Fossil oil pools and residual oil and gas pools in the lower assemblage of Qianzhong uplift[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2008, 28 (8): 39- 42.
12	罗胜元, 陈孝红, 刘安, 等. 中扬子宜昌地区下寒武统水井沱组页岩气地球化学特征及其成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (5): 999- 1010.
	Luo Shengyuan , Chen Xiaohong , Liu An , et al. Geochemical features and genesis of shale gas from the Lower Cambrian Shuijingtuo Formation shale in Yichang block, Middle Yangtze region[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (5): 999- 1010.
13	赵建华, 金之钧, 林畅松, 等. 上扬子地区下寒武统筇竹寺组页岩沉积环境[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (4): 701- 715.
	Zhao Jianhua , Jin Zhijun , Lin Changsong , et al. Sedimentary environment of the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation shale in the Upper Yangtze region[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (4): 701- 715.
14	刘忠宝, 高波, 张钰莹, 等. 上扬子地区下寒武统页岩沉积相类型及分布特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44 (1): 21- 31.
	Liu Zhongbao , Gao Bo , Zhang Yuying , et al. Types and distribution of the shale sedimentary facies of the Lower Cambrian in Upper Yangtze area, South China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44 (1): 21- 31.
15	黄金亮, 邹才能, 李建忠, 等. 川南下寒武统筇竹寺组页岩气形成条件及资源潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39 (1): 69- 75.
	Huang Jinliang , Zou Caineng , Li Jianzhong , et al. Shale gas generation and potential of the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in Southern Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39 (1): 69- 75.
16	刘树根, 王一刚, 孙玮, 等. 拉张槽对四川盆地海相油气分布的控制作用[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 43 (1): 1- 23.
	Liu Shugen , Wang Yigang , Sun Wei , et al. Control of intracratonic sags on the hydrocarbon accumulations in the marine strata across the Sichuan basin, china[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2016, 43 (1): 1- 23.
17	陈代钊, 汪建国, 严德天, 等. 扬子地区古生代主要烃源岩有机质富集的环境动力学机制与差异[J]. 地质科学, 2011, 46 (1): 5- 26.
	Chen Daizhao , Wang Jianguo , Yan Detian , et al. Environmental dynamics of organic accumulation for the principal Paleozoic source rocks on Yangtze block[J]. Chinese Journalof Geology, 2011, 46 (1): 5- 26.
18	闫德宇, 黄文辉, 王婷灏, 等. 中、下扬子地区下寒武统黑色页岩微量元素富集特征[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23 (3): 42- 50.
	Yan Deyu , Huang Wenhui , Wang Tinghao , et al. Trace element cha-racteristics of the lower Cambrian black shales in middle and lower Yangtze area, china[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23 (3): 42- 50.
19	李红敬, 林正良, 解习农. 下扬子地区古生界硅岩地球化学特征及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27 (5): 232- 239.
	Li Hongjing , Lin Zhengliang , Xie Xinong . Geochemical characteristics and origin of Palaeozoic siliceous rocks in Lower Yangtze area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27 (5): 232- 239.
20	路琳琳, 纪友亮. 下扬子地区寒武纪层序格架及古地理演化[J]. 古地理学报, 2013, 15 (6): 765- 776.
	Lu Linlin , Ji Youliang . Sequence stratigraphic framework and palaeogeography evolution of the Cambrian in Lower Yangtze area[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2013, 15 (6): 765- 776.
21	刘占红. 下扬子地区下寒武统荷塘组泥页岩层序演化及其对气源潜力的控制:以杨树岭剖面为例[J]. 地质科技情报, 2013, 32 (6): 95- 102+115.
	Liu Zhanhong . Sequences stratigraphic evolution and its controlling significance on the shale gas generation potential of the early Cambrian Hhetang formation black shales in the lower Yangtze area:case study of Yangshuling section[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2013, 32 (6): 95- 102+115.
22	樊佳莉. 下扬子地区下寒武统富有机质页岩的岩相与沉积环境[J]. 地质科技情报, 2017, (5): 162- 169.
	Fan Jiali . Lithofacies and depositional setting of the lower Cambrian organic-rich shale of the lower Yangtze region, China[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2017, (5): 162- 169.
23	唐显春, 曾辉, 张培先, 等. 宣城地区荷塘组页岩含气性浅析[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2011, 1 (Z1): 78- 84.
	Tang Xianchun , Zeng Hui , Zhang Peixian , et al. Discussion about the gas-bearing nature of the shale of Hetang group in Xuancheng area[J]. Eservoir Evaluation and Development, 2011, 1 (Z1): 78- 84.
24	郝天珧, SuhMancheol, 刘建华, 等. 黄海深部结构与中朝-扬子块体结合带在海区位置的地球物理研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2004, 11 (3): 51- 61.
	Hao Tianyao , Suh Mancheol , Liu Jianhua , et al. Deep structure and boundary belt position between Sino-Korean and Yangtze blocks in Yellow Sea[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2004, 11 (3): 51- 61.
25	印峰, 杨风丽, 叶芳, 等. 晚震旦至中奥陶世下扬子被动大陆边缘原型盆地特征[J]. 地球科学, 2013, 38 (5): 1053- 1064.
	Yin Feng , Yang Fengli , Ye Fang , et al. Late Sinian-middle Ordovician the prototype basin characteristics of passive continental margin in lower Yangtze[J]. Earth Science, 2013, 38 (5): 1053- 1064.
26	吴根耀, 陈焕疆, 马力, 等. 苏皖地块——特提斯演化阶段独立的构造单元[J]. 古地理学报, 2002, 4 (2): 77- 87.
	Wu Genyao , Chen Huanjiang , Ma Li , et al. Su-Wan block:an independent tectonic unit during period of Tethyan evolution[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2002, 4 (2): 77- 87.
27	陈建文, 龚建明, 李刚, 等. 南黄海盆地海相中-古生界油气资源潜力巨大[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2016, 32 (1): 1- 7.
	Chen Jianwen , Gong Jianming , Li Gang , et al. Great resources potential of the marine Mesozoic-Paleozoic in the South Yellow Sea basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2016, 32 (1): 1- 7.
28	袁勇, 陈建文, 梁杰, 等. 海陆对比看南黄海海相中-古生界的生储盖组合特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2017, 39 (2): 195- 202.
	Yuan Yong , Chen Jianwen , Liang Jie , et al. Source-reservoir-seal assemblage of marine Mesozoic-Paleozoic in South Yellow Sea Basin by land-ocean comparison[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2017, 39 (2): 195- 202.
29	Landing E . Precambrian-Cambrian boundary global stratotype ratified and a new perspective of Cambrian time[J]. Geology, 1994, 22 (2): 179- 182.
30	周浩达. 下扬子区早寒武世"石煤"沉积特征与成因机理探讨——兼论与含油气性关系[J]. 石油实验地质, 1990, (1): 36- 43.
	Zhou Haoda . On the mechanism and thecharacteristics of early Cambrian "stone coal" in lower Yangtze region and their relation to petroliferous potentials[J]. Experimental Petroleum Geology, 1990, (1): 36- 43.
31	向雷, 蔡春芳, 贺训云, 等. 华南渣拉沟剖面纽芬兰世沉积水体氧化还原状态演化[J]. 地质学报, 2015, 89 (6): 1120- 1133.
	Xiang Lei , Cai Chunfang , He Xunyun , et al. Evolution of redox state during the terreneuvian Epoch at Zhalagou section, South China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2015, 89 (6): 1120- 1133.
32	杨爱华, 朱茂炎, 张俊明. 皖南、浙西寒武系黄柏岭组和荷塘组的年代地层学研究[J]. 地层学杂志, 2008, 32 (4): 343- 352.
	Yang Aihua , Zhu Maoyan , Zhang Junming . Chronostratigraphy of Cambrian Huangboling and Hetang formations in southern Aanhui and western Zhejiang[J]. JournalOf Stratigraphy, 2008, 32 (4): 343- 352.
33	朱茂炎, 杨爱华, 袁金良, 等. 中国寒武纪综合地层和时间框架[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2019, 49 (1): 26- 65.
	Zhu Maoyan , Yang Aihua , Yuan Jinliang , et al. Synthetical stratigraphy and time frame of Cambrian in China[J]. Scientia Sinica Terrae, 2019, 49 (1): 26- 65.
34	姜永果, 郭欣, 周洪瑞, 等. 云南曲靖地区下寒武统黑色岩系岩石地球化学特征与成因[J]. 矿物学报, 2015, 35 (4): 489- 496.
	Jiang Yongguo , Guo Xin , Zhou Hongrui , et al. Geochemistry and Genesis of Lower Cambrian Black Rocks from Qujing Area, Yunnan Province, China[J]. Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 2015, 35 (4): 489- 496.
35	罗宏谓, 侯明才, 刘宇, 等. 桂中鹿寨地区鹿寨组下段地球化学特征及有机质富集因素[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 46 (2): 227- 239.
	Luo Hongwei , Hou Mingcai , Liu Yu , et al. Geochemical characteristics and organic matter enrichment of the lower section of Luzhai Formation in Luzhai, Guangxi, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology edition), 2019, 46 (2): 227- 239.
36	周航兵.湘西北下寒武统底部黑色岩系地球化学特征及地质意义[D].江西:东华理工大学, 2019.
	Zhou Hangbing.Geochemical Characteristics and geological significance of the Lower Cambrian Black Rock Series in Northwestern Hunan[D].Jiangxi: East China University of Technology, 2019.
37	Mclennan S M.Relationships between the trace element composition of sedimentary rocks and upper continental crust[J].Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 2001, 2(4):2000GC000109.
38	Rudnick R L , Gao Shan , Ling Wenli , et al. Petrology and geochemistry of spinel peridotite xenoliths from Hannuoba and Qixia, North China craton[J]. lithos, 2014, 77 (1-4): 609- 637.
39	Tribovillard N , Bout-Roumazeilles V , Algeo T , et al. Paleodepositional conditions in the Orca Basin as inferred from organic matter and trace metal contents[J]. Marine Geology, 2012, 254 (1): 62- 72.
40	常华进, 储雪蕾, 冯连君, 等. 湖南安化留茶坡硅质岩的REE地球化学特征及其意义[J]. 中国地质, 2008, (5): 879- 887.
	Chang Huajin , Chu Xuelei , Feng Lianjun , et al. REE geochemistry of the Liuchapo chert in Anhua, Hunan[J]. China Geology, 2008, (5): 879- 887.
41	Bai Y Y , Liu Z J , Sun P C , et al. Rare earth and major element geochemistry of Eocene fine-grained sediments in oil shale-and coal-bearing layers of the Meihe Basin, Northeast China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2015, 97 (97): 89- 101.
42	张玉玺, 周江羽, 陈建文, 等. 下扬子地区幕府山组陆缘海-台地黑色细粒沉积岩系沉积学和孔隙结构特征[J]. 地球科学,
	Zhang Yuxi , Zhou Jiangyu , Chen Jianwen , et al. , Sedimentology and Porosity Structures of the Epicontinental Sea-Platform fine-grained deposits of Mufushan Formation in Lower Yangtze Area[J]. Earth Science,
43	Schoepfer S D, Shen Jun, Wei Hengye, et al.Total organic carbon, organic phosphorus, and biogenic barium fluxes as proxies for paleomarine productivity[J].Earth-Science Reviews, 2015:S0012825214001573.
44	Eagle M , Paytan A , Kevin R A , et al. A comparison between excess barium and barite as indicators of carbon export[J]. Paleoceanography, 2003, 18 (1): 1- 13.
45	Tribovillard N , Algeo T J , Baudin F , et al. Analysis of marine environmental conditions based onmolybdenum-uranium covariation-Applications to Mesozoic paleoceanography[J]. Chemical Geology, 2012, 324-325, 46- 58.
46	Lézin C , Andreu B , Pellenard P , et al. Geochemical disturbance and paleoenvironmental changes during the Early Toarcian in NW Europe[J]. Chemical Geology, 2013, 341 (Complete): 1- 15.
47	Cheng M , Li C , Zhou L , et al. Transient deep-water oxygenation in the early Cambrian Nanhua Basin, South China[J]. Geochimica Et Cosmochimica Acta, 2017, 210, 42- 58.
48	Li M, Chen J, Wang T, et al.Nitrogen isotope and trace element composition characteristics of the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation shale in the upper -middle Yangtze region, South China[J].Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology, 2018:S003101821731149.
49	Algeo T J , Rowe H . Paleoceanographic applications of trace-metal concentration data[J]. Chemical Geology, 2012, 324-325, 6- 18.

[1]	蒲秀刚, 董姜畅, 柴公权, 宋舜尧, 时战楠, 韩文中, 张伟, 解德录. 渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷古近系孔店组二段页岩高丰度有机质富集模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 696-709.
[2]	翟常博, 林良彪, 尤东华, 刘冯斌, 刘思雨. 川西南地区中二叠统茅口组一段沉积微相特征及有机质富集模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 440-456.
[3]	张天舒, 朱如凯, 蔡毅, 王华建, 吕丹, 周海燕, 付秀丽, 刘畅, 崔坤宁, 张素荣, 王浡, 吴松涛, 张婧雅, 姜晓华, 冯有良, 刘合. 松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组页岩层序等时格架下的有机质分布规律[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 869-886.
[4]	吕丹, 王华建, 李罡, 张江永, 付秀丽, 刘畅, 王晓梅, 朱如凯, 张水昌. 松辽盆地青山口组页岩沉积水体环境演变的古生物学证据[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 857-868.
[5]	张瑞, 金之钧, 朱如凯, 李明松, 惠潇, 魏韧, 贺翔武, 张谦. 中国陆相富有机质页岩沉积速率研究及其页岩油勘探意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 829-845.
[6]	朱如凯, 李梦莹, 杨静儒, 张素荣, 蔡毅, 曹琰, 康缘. 细粒沉积学研究进展与发展方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(2): 251-264.
[7]	丁江辉, 张金川, 石刚, 申宝剑, 唐玄, 杨振恒, 李兴起, 李楚雄. 皖南地区上二叠统大隆组页岩沉积环境与有机质富集机理[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 158-172.
[8]	程建, 郑伦举. 川南地区金页1井早寒武世烃源岩沉积地球化学特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 800-810.
[9]	高岗, 徐新德, 刘诗局, 甘军, 胡晨晖, 赵建宇. 涠西南凹陷流沙港组二段优质烃源岩判别及其控油作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(2): 339-347.
[10]	王鹏万, 张磊, 李昌, 李娴静, 邹辰, 张朝, 李君军, 李庆飞. 黑色页岩氧化还原条件与有机质富集机制——以昭通页岩气示范区A井五峰组-龙马溪组下段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(5): 933-943.
[11]	朱晓军, 蔡进功. 泥质烃源岩的比表面与有机质关系研究进展及意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2012, 33(3): 375-384.
[12]	李娟, 于炳松, 张金川, 李玉喜, 武景淑. 黔北地区下寒武统黑色页岩储层特征及其影响因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2012, 33(3): 364-374.
[13]	宋一涛, 廖永胜, 王忠. 潍北凹陷孔店组烃源岩评价及油源分析[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2005, 26(4): 487-493.
[14]	郭成贤, 朱忠德, 胡明毅, 胡爱梅, 孟宪富, 李相明. 石门杨家坪早寒武世的沉积环境[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 1993, 14(4): 326-330.
[15]	肖传桃, 朱忠德. 湖南石门杨家坪早寒武世三叶虫动物群[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 1993, 14(4): 297-303.