中国陆相湖盆细粒沉积岩岩石学特征及成岩演化表征——以四川盆地元坝地区下侏罗统大安寨段为例

doi:10.11743/ogg20210218

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用岩心观察、薄片鉴定、扫描电镜和X射线衍射分析对四川盆地元坝地区下侏罗统大安寨段湖相细粒岩岩性及成岩作用特征进行了描述，探讨了有利岩石类型及成因。本段发育泥岩类（泥岩与页岩）、粉砂岩和灰岩3大类岩石，具体为泥岩与页岩、灰质泥岩，以及介壳页岩和介壳灰岩；矿物组分主要为石英、粘土矿物、方解石、长石和黄铁矿；粘土矿物包括伊蒙混层、伊利石、高岭石和绿泥石；发育介壳页岩和泥岩夹介壳灰岩的岩石组合类型为主。本段细粒岩经历压实作用、胶结作用、溶蚀作用、交代作用、粘土矿物的转化作用及有机质的生烃演化作用，目前处于中成岩阶段B亚期，压实作用和胶结作用是控制页岩和灰岩物性变化的主要因素。受沉积及成岩的控制，富有机质页岩和介壳页岩是最有利的储集岩。成岩影响导致常规储层的介壳灰岩与灰岩致密而没有储集油气，反而使相对致密的细粒介壳页岩成为页岩气藏的有利储层，导致了测试时介壳页岩大量出气而相邻的介壳灰岩无气泡。纹层与微纹层（显微镜下显示纹层）发育及硅质与灰质组分显微定向排列有利于优质储层形成。

关键词: 成岩演化, 岩石学特征, 细粒沉积岩, 大安寨段, 元坝地区, 四川盆地

Abstract:

Core observation, thin section identification, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction analysis were used to finely describe the petrological characteristics and diagenesis of fine-grained sedimentary rocks as well as to discuss rock types with hydrocarbon potential and their genesis in the Lower Jurassic Da'anzhai Member of Yuanba area in the Sichuan Basin.The results show that there are three types of rocks, namely mudstone (mudstone, conchoidal shale and calcareous mudstone), siltstone and limestone (conchoidal limestone).The main mineral components are quartz, clay minerals (dominated by illite/smectitem (I/S) mixed layer, illite, kaolinite and chlorite), calcite, feldspar and pyrite; the rock assemblages are mainly conchoidal shale and mudstone interbedded with conchoidal limestone.The fine-grained rocks, currently at the B sub-stage of the mesodiagenesis, experienced compaction, cementation, dissolution, metasomasis, recrystallization of clay minerals and hydrocarbon generation from organic matters, of which, compaction and cementation were the major factors controlling the physical properties of shale and limestone.It also shows that, controlled by sedimentation and diagenesis, the organic-rich shale and the conchoidal shale are two most promising rock types for hydrocarbon reservoirs.Also as a result of diagenesis processes, the conventional reservoirs of conchoidal limestone and limestone are too tight to hold any oil or gas, but the fine-grained sedimentary rock and conchoidal shale of less tight are wonderful unconventional shale gas reservoirs.This assumption was verified in field tests during which large volume of gas flew out of conchoidal shale, but none from the adjacent conchoidal limestone.The result also suggests that rocks with well-developed laminae and micro-laminae (observed under microscope) or with siliceous and calcareous compositions of directional arrangement are potentially high-quality reservoir rocks.

Key words: diagenetic evolution, petrologic feature, fine-grained sedimentary rock, Da'anzhai Member, Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号:

TE121.3

朱毅秀,金振奎,金科,等. 中国陆相湖盆细粒沉积岩岩石学特征及成岩演化表征——以四川盆地元坝地区下侏罗统大安寨段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 494-508. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210218 Yixiu Zhu,Zhenkui Jin,Ke Jin,et al. Petrologic features and diagenetic evolution of fine-grained sedimentary rocks in continental lacustrine basins: A case study on the Lower Jurassic Da'anzhai Member of Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(2): 494-508. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210218

图/表 14

表1

图1

表2

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

表3

图8

图9

表4

图10

参考文献 37

1	金之钧, 白振瑞, 高波, 等. 中国迎来页岩油气革命了吗?[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (3): 451- 458.
	Jin Zhijun , Bai Zhenrui , Gao Bo , et al. Has China ushered in the shale oil and gas revolution?[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (3): 451- 458.
2	姜在兴, 梁超, 吴靖, 等. 含油气细粒沉积岩研究的几个问题[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34 (6): 1031- 1039.
	Jiang Zaixing , Liang Chao , Wu Jing , et al. Several issues in sedimentological studies on hydrocarbon-bearing fine-grained sedimentary rocks[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34 (6): 1031- 1039.
3	张文伟. 细粒沉积岩储层微观特征研究方法及应用——以大民屯凹陷安福屯地区S352井为例[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2019, 33 (4): 11- 15.
	Zhang Wenwei . Microcosmic characteristics of fine-grained sedimentary reservoirs and its application——By taking S352 well in Anfutun area of Damintun Sag as an example[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2019, 33 (4): 11- 15.
4	林小兵, 田景春, 刘莉萍, 等. 四川盆地川西坳陷须家河组硅质碎屑颗粒溶蚀作用及机理[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41 (3): 404- 410.
	Lin Xiaobing , Tian Jingchun , Liu Liping , et al. Dissolution mechanism of siliciclastic particles in Xujiahe Formation, West Sichuan Depression, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41 (3): 404- 410.
5	周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 陈长伟, 等. 陆相湖盆细粒沉积岩油气的概念、特征及勘探意义: 以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段为例[J]. 地球科学, 2018, 43 (10): 3625- 3639.
	Zhou Lihong , Pu Xiugang , Chen Changwei , et al. Concept, Characteri-stics and prospecting significance of fine-grained sedimentary oil gas in Terrestrial lake basin: A case from the second member of Paleogene Kongdian Formation of Cangdong Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Earth Science, 2018, 43 (10): 3625- 3639.
6	高波, 刘忠宝, 舒志国, 等. 中上扬子地区下寒武统页岩气储层特征及勘探方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (2): 284- 294.
	Gao Bo , Liu Zhongbao , Shu Zhiguo , et al. Reservoir characteristics and exploration of the Lower Cambrian shale gas in the Middle-Upper Yangtze area[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (2): 284- 294.
7	赵建华, 金之钧, 林畅松, 等. 上扬子地区下寒武统筇竹寺组页岩沉积环境[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (4): 701- 715.
	Zhao Jianhua , Jin Zhijun , Lin Changsong , et al. Sedimentary environment of the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation shale in the Upper Yangtze region[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (4): 701- 715.
8	朱彤, 王烽, 俞凌杰, 等. 四川盆地页岩气富集控制因素及类型[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37 (3): 399- 407.
	Zhu Tong , Wang Feng , Yu Lingjie , et al. Controlling factors and types of shale gas enrichment in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37 (3): 399- 407.
9	刘忠宝, 刘光祥, 胡宗全, 等. 陆相页岩层系岩相类型、组合特征及其油气勘探意义——以四川盆地中下侏罗统为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39 (12): 10- 21.
	Liu Zhongbao , Liu Guangxiang , Hu Zongquan , et al. Lithofacies types and assemblage features of continental shale strata and their significance for shale gas exploration: A case study of the Middle and Lower Jurassic Strata in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39 (12): 10- 21.
10	金之钧, 胡宗全, 高波, 等. 川东南地区五峰组-龙马溪组页岩气富集与高产控制因素[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23 (1): 1- 10.
	Jin Zhijun , Hu Zongquan , Gao Bo , et al. Controlling factors on the enrichment and high productivity of shale gas in the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations, southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23 (1): 1- 10.
11	郭旭升, 胡东风, 魏祥峰, 等. 四川盆地焦石坝地区页岩裂缝发育主控因素及对产能的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37 (6): 799- 808.
	Guo Xusheng , Hu Dongfeng , Wei Xiangfeng , et al. Main controlling factors on shale fractures and their influences on production capacity in Jiaoshiba area, the Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37 (6): 799- 808.
12	郭彤楼, 李宇平, 魏志红. 四川盆地元坝地区自流井组页岩气成藏条件[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2011, 22 (1): 1- 7.
	Guo Tonglou , Li Yuping , Wei Zhihong . Reservoir-forming conditions of shale gas in Ziliujing Formation of Yuanba Area in Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2011, 22 (1): 1- 7.
13	郭旭升, 胡东风, 李宇平, 等. 四川盆地元坝气田发现与理论技术[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45 (1): 14- 26.
	Guo Xusheng , Hu Dongfeng , Li Yuping , et al. Discovery and theoretical and technical innovations of Yuanba gas field in Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45 (1): 14- 26.
14	王玮, 黄东, 易海永, 等. 淡水湖相页岩小层精细划分及地球化学特征: 以四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41 (5): 724- 730.
	Wang Wei , Huang Dong , Yi Haiyong , et al. Stratigraphic division and geochemical characteristics of freshwater lacustrine shale: A case study of Jurassic Da'anzhai Section, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41 (5): 724- 730.
15	杨跃明, 黄东, 杨光, 等. 四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段湖相页岩油气形成地质条件及勘探方向[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2019, 42 (2): 1- 12.
	Yang Yueming , Huang Dong , Yang Guang , et al. Geological conditions to form lacustrine facies shale oil and gas of Jurassic Daanzhai Member in Sichuan Basin and exploration directions[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2019, 42 (2): 1- 12.
16	刘殊, 许红梅. 四川大安寨段薄层灰岩油气富集区预测[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2001, 6 (2): 44- 50.
	Liu Shu , Xu Hongmei . Favorable area predication of Da'anzhai thin-bedded limestone in Sichuan[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2001, 6 (2): 44- 50.
17	陈世加, 张焕旭, 路俊刚, 等. 四川盆地中部侏罗系大安寨段致密油富集高产控制因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42 (2): 186- 193.
	Chen Shijia , Zhang Huanxu , Lu Jungang , et al. Controlling factors of Jurassic Da'anzhai Member tight oil accumulation and high production in central Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42 (2): 186- 193.
18	王玮, 沈忠民, 裴森奇, 等. 致密砂岩气藏油气轻烃特征及其地质意义: 以四川盆地西北部须家河组气藏为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40 (6): 818- 827.
	Wang Wei , Shen Zhongmin , Pei Senqi , et al. Light hydrocarbon chara-cteristics of petroleum in a tight sandstone gas reservoir and its geological significance: A case study of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation gas reservoir in the northwestern Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40 (6): 818- 827.
19	何志勇, 刘海涛, 肖伟, 等. 四川盆地元坝地区下侏罗统介壳灰岩储层分布预测[J]. 现代地质, 2017, 31 (1): 142- 149.
	He Zhiyong , Liu Haitao , Xiao Wei , et al. Distribution prediction of Lower Jurassic shell limestone reservoir in Yuanba area of Sichuan Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2017, 31 (1): 142- 149.
20	杨光, 黄东, 黄平辉, 等. 四川盆地中部侏罗系大安寨段致密油高产稳产主控因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44 (5): 817- 826.
	Yang Guang , Huang Dong , Huang Pinghui , et al. Control factors of high and stable production of Jurassic Da'anzhai Member tight oil in central Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44 (5): 817- 826.
21	周德华, 孙川翔, 刘忠宝, 等. 川东北地区大安寨段陆相页岩气藏地质特征[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25 (5): 38- 48.
	Zhou Dehua , Sun Chuanxiang , Liu Zhongbao , et al. Geological chara-cteristics of continental shale gas reservoir in the Jurassic Da'anzhai member in the northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25 (5): 38- 48.
22	彭嫦姿, 彭俊, 陈燕辉, 等. 四川盆地元坝地区大安寨段页岩气"甜点"地震预测[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34 (6): 42- 47.
	Peng Changzi , Peng Jun , Chen Yanhui , et al. Seismic prediction of sweet spots in the Da'anzhai Shale Play, Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34 (6): 42- 47.
23	赵建华, 金之钧, 金振奎, 等. 岩石学方法区分页岩中有机质类型[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38 (4): 514- 520.
	Zhao Jianhua , Jin Zhijun , Jin Zhenkui , et al. Petrographic methods to distinguish organic matter type in shale[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2016, 38 (4): 514- 520.
24	李昌伟, 陶士振, 董大忠, 等. 国内外页岩气形成条件对比与有利区优选[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26 (5): 986- 1000.
	Li Changwei , Tao Shhizhen , Dong Dazhong , et al. Comparison of the formation condition of shale gas between domestic and abroad and favorable areas evaluation[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26 (5): 986- 1000.
25	管全中, 董大忠, 王淑芳, 等. 海相和陆相页岩储层微观结构差异性分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27 (3): 524- 531.
	Guan Quanzhong , Dong Dazhong , Wang Shufang , et al. Analyses on differences of microstructure between marine and lacustrine facies shale reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27 (3): 524- 531.
26	左如斯, 杨威, 王乾右, 等. 川西坳陷须家河组陆相页岩岩相控制下的微观储集特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26 (6): 22- 28.
	Zuo Rusi , Yang Wei , Wang Qianyou , et al. Lithofacies-control microscopic reservoir haracterization of the continental shale in the Xujiahe Formation of western Sichuan Depression[J]. Special oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2019, 26 (6): 22- 28.
27	周德华, 焦方正, 郭旭升, 等. 川东北元坝区块中下侏罗统页岩油气地质分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2013, 35 (6): 596- 600.
	Zhou Dehua , Jiao Fangzheng , Guo Xusheng , et al. Geologic analysis of Middle-Lower Jurassic shale reservoirs in Yuanba area, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2013, 35 (6): 596- 600.
28	李英强, 何登发. 四川盆地及邻区早侏罗世构造-沉积环境与原型盆地演化[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35 (2): 219- 232.
	Li Yingqiang , He Dengfa . Evolution of tectonic-depositional environment and prototype basins of the Early Jurassic in Sichuan Basin and adiacent areas[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014, 35 (2): 219- 232.
29	黄东, 段勇, 李育聪, 等. 淡水湖相页岩油气有机碳含量下限研究——以四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段为例[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2018, 23 (6): 38- 45.
	Huang Dong , Duan Yong , Li Yucong , et al. Study on the TOC lower limit of shale oil and gas of freshwater lake facies: A case study on the Jurassic Da'anzhai member in the Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2018, 23 (6): 38- 45.
30	刘达望, 张文济, 任康绪, 等. 川东地区大安寨段岩石类型及其组合特征的勘探意义[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2018, 18 (6): 73- 80.
	Liu Dawang , Zhang Wenji , Reng Kangxu , et al. Rock types and their association characteristics and significance for exploration in the Da'anzhai Member, Eastern Sichuan[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2018, 18 (6): 73- 80.
31	朱彤, 胡宗全, 刘忠宝, 等. 四川盆地湖相页岩气源-储配置类型及评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39 (6): 1146- 1153.
	Zhu tong , Hu Zongquan , Liu Zhongbao , et al. Types and evaluation of the source-reservoir configuration of lacustrine shale gas in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39 (6): 1146- 1153.
32	韩盛博, 李伍. 上扬子区龙马溪组页岩中黄铁矿成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30 (11): 1608- 1618.
	Han Shengbo , Li Wu . Study on the genesis of pyrite in the Longmaxi Formation shale in the Upper Yangtze area[J]. Natural Gas Geoscie-nce, 2019, 30 (11): 1608- 1618.
33	Wilkin R T , Arthur M A , Dean W E . History of water-column anoxia in the Black Sea indicated by pyrite framboid size distributions[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letter, 1997, 148 (3-4): 517- 525.
34	曹涛涛, 邓模, 宋之光, 等. 黄铁矿对页岩油气富集成藏影响研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29 (3): 404- 414.
	Cao Taotao , Deng Mo , Song Zhiguang , et al. Study on the effect of pyrite on the accumulation of shale oil and gas[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29 (3): 404- 414.
35	张光荣, 聂海宽, 唐玄, 等. 页岩中黄铁矿类型及其对页岩气富集的影响——以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组-龙马溪组页岩为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42 (3): 459- 466.
	Zhang Guangrong , Nie Haikuan , Tang Xuan , et al. Pyrite type and its effect on shale gas accumulation: A case study of Wufeng-Longmaxi Shale in Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42 (3): 459- 466.
36	赵迪斐, 郭英海, 朱炎铭, 等. 龙马溪组页岩黄铁矿微观赋孔特征及地质意义[J]. 沉积学报, 2018, 36 (5): 864- 876.
	Zhao Difei , Guo Yinghai , Zhu Yanming , et al. Micropore characteristics and geological significance of pyrite in shale rocks of Longmaxi Formation[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2018, 36 (5): 864- 876.
37	Aplin A C , Macquaker J H . Mudstone diversity: Origin and implications for source, seal, and reservoir properties in petroleum systems[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2011, 95 (12): 2031- 2059.

井号	测试情况气/10⁴(m³)	沉积相
YB11	14.44	半深湖
YB102	8.48	半深湖
YB5	14.08	半深湖
YB21	50.70	半深湖
YB101	13.97	半深湖
YB161	1.58	半深湖

样品数/个	划分标志	分布范围	平均值	最高成岩阶段
10	R_o/%	1.44~1.83	1.67	中成岩阶段B期
25	T_max/℃	371~501	468	中成岩阶段B期
35	粘土矿物组合	伊蒙混层+伊利石+绿泥石+高岭石	—	中成岩阶段B期
35	蒙皂石含量比/%	4.00~30.00	15.53	中成岩阶段B期
50	孔隙类型	晶间孔、溶蚀孔、有机孔和微裂缝为主	—	中成岩阶段B期

岩石类型	平均孔隙度/%	平均渗透率/(10^-3 μm²)	平均TOC/%
泥岩	3.63	>1.83	1.32
介壳页岩	3.63	>1.83	1.15
介壳灰岩	1.78	0.06	0.20
泥质粉砂岩	1.78	0.06	0.26

[1]	邓宾, 何宇, 黄家强, 罗强, 杨荣军, 于豪, 张静, 刘树根. 前陆盆地形成与演化砂箱物理模拟启示——以四川盆地西部龙门山为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 401-415.
[2]	杨金赫. 盆-山转换带构造变形特征及成因机制——以四川盆地东南部桑木场背斜为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 416-429.
[3]	何治亮, 聂海宽, 李双建, 刘光祥, 丁江辉, 边瑞康, 卢志远. 特提斯域板块构造约束下上扬子地区二叠系龙潭组页岩气的差异性赋存[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 1-15.
[4]	王红岩, 施振生, 孙莎莎, 张磊夫. 四川盆地及周缘志留系龙马溪组一段深层页岩储层特征及其成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 66-75.
[5]	沈骋, 任岚, 赵金洲, 陈铭培. 页岩岩相组合划分标准及其对缝网形成的影响——以四川盆地志留系龙马溪组页岩为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 98-106, 123.
[6]	孙莎莎, 董大忠, 李育聪, 王红岩, 施振生, 黄世伟, 昌燕, 拜文华. 四川盆地侏罗系自流井组大安寨段陆相页岩油气地质特征及成藏控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 124-135.
[7]	刘忠宝, 胡宗全, 刘光祥, 刘珠江, 刘晧天, 郝景宇, 王鹏威, 李鹏. 四川盆地东北部下侏罗统自流井组陆相页岩储层孔隙特征及形成控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 136-145.
[8]	朱洪建, 琚宜文, 孙岩, 黄骋, 冯宏业, AliRaza, 余坤, 乔鹏, 肖蕾. 构造变形作用下页岩孔裂隙结构演化特征及其模式——以四川盆地及其周缘下古生界海相页岩为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 186-200, 240.
[9]	舒志国, 周林, 李雄, 刘皓天, 曾勇, 谢洪光, 姚明君, 王艳春. 四川盆地东部复兴地区侏罗系自流井组东岳庙段陆相页岩凝析气藏地质特征及勘探开发前景[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 212-223.
[10]	陆亚秋, 梁榜, 王超, 刘超, 吉靖. 四川盆地涪陵页岩气田江东区块下古生界深层页岩气勘探开发实践与启示[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 241-250.
[11]	霍建峰, 高健, 郭小文, 易积正, 舒志国, 包汉勇, 杨锐, 罗涛, 何生. 川东地区龙马溪组页岩不同岩相孔隙结构特征及其主控因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1162-1175.
[12]	马德芹, 田景春, 林小兵, 文龙, 徐亮. 四川盆地二叠系长兴组生物礁发育的差异性及控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1176-1187.
[13]	祖克威, 范凌霄, 王波, 曹东升, 管聪, 李中超, 程秀申. 四川盆地普光地区嘉陵江组二段碳酸盐岩储层裂缝发育规律[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1188-1196.
[14]	邓模, 段新国, 翟常博, 龙胜祥, 杨振恒, 郑伦举, 李章畅, 曹涛涛. 页岩热模拟过程中液态烃含量变化及对物性的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1310-1320.
[15]	庹秀松, 陈孔全, 罗顺社, 汤济广, 张斗中, 沈均均. 四川盆地东南缘齐岳山断裂构造特征与页岩气保存条件[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 1017-1027.