塔里木盆地古城地区古生界垒-扭叠合复合断层-裂缝体模型

doi:10.11743/ogg20210305

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

塔中地区深层古生界巨厚的碳酸盐岩是当前油气勘探的热点。近年来，在塔中北坡的北西、北东与北东东向断层-裂缝带中取得了油气勘探的重大突破。然而，在其邻近的古城地区断层-裂缝体的研究则一直很薄弱，这一状况严重地制约了该区的油气勘探进程。基于高分辨率三维地震剖面，提出了古城地区古生界垒-扭叠合复合断层-裂缝体模型。其要点是：①剖面上，断层-裂缝体的性质不具有继承性。在深部寒武系、中部中-下奥陶统、上部上奥陶统和顶部石炭系依次发育加里东早期伸展断层-张性裂缝带、加里东中期压扭断层-压剪性裂缝带、加里东晚期张扭断层-张剪性裂缝带和海西早期张扭断层-张剪性裂缝带，它们在垂向上依次叠合。②平面上，自下而上断层-裂缝体的走向发生了明显的顺时针和逆时针旋转。在深部寒武系、中部中-下奥陶统、上部上奥陶统和顶部石炭系断层-裂缝体的走向分别为北东东向、北北东向、北东-北东东向和北东向，它们在横向上依次复合。③剖面上，断层-裂缝体呈现出“上倒锥、下地垒”的形态叠合特点和“上下张性、中间压性”的性质叠合特点。④平面上，断层-裂缝体呈现出“扫帚状”和雁列状的展布特点。

关键词: 断层-裂缝体模型, 走滑断层, 古生界, 塔中隆起北斜坡, 塔里木盆地

Abstract:

The massive carbonate rocks in the deep Paleozoic of Tazhong area are currently a hot spot for oil and gas exploration.Despite several major breakthroughs in oil and gas exploration made along the NW-, NE-, and NEE-trending fault-fracture zones on the northern slope of Tazhong in recent years, the research on fault-fracture bodies in neighboring Gucheng area is yet to be deepened, which has severely restricted the oil and gas exploration in the area.Based on high-resolution 3D seismic sections, this study proposed a Paleozoic superimposed horst-twist fault-fracture body model in Gucheng area, the features of which are summarized as follows.(1) The fault-fracture bodies are not inherited vertically.From the bottom up, i.e.from the Cambrian, Middle-to-Lower Ordovician, Upper Ordovician to Carboniferous, four zones, including the Early Caledonian extensional fault-fracture zone, the Mid-Caledonian transpressional fault-fracture zone, the Late Caledonian transtensional fault-fracture zone and the Early Hercynian transtensional fault-fracture zone are successively developed and superimposed.(2) Horizontally, the strike of the fault-fracture bodies from bottom to top shows obvious clockwise and counterclockwise rotation with those in the deep Cambrian, Middle-to-Lower Ordovician, Upper Ordovician, and top Carboniferous striking NEE, NNE, NE-NEE and NE, respectively and compositely.(3) The fault-fracture bodies feature a superposition that can be roughly described as "an inverted cone in the upper and a horst in the lower", and "being tensile in upper and lower, but compressional in the middle" from a sectional view.(4) The fault-fracture bodies are also distributed in a "broom-shaped" and en echelon arrangement from a map view.

Key words: fault-fracture body model, strike-slip fault, Paleozoic, northern slope of Tazhong Uplift, Tarim Basin

中图分类号:

TE121.2

何光玉,曹自成,姚泽伟,等. 塔里木盆地古城地区古生界垒-扭叠合复合断层-裂缝体模型[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 587-594. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210305 Guangyu He,Zicheng Cao,Zewei Yao,et al. Paleozoic horst-twist superimposed fault-fracture body model in Gucheng area of Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(3): 587-594. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210305

图/表 6

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 25

1	王招明, 杨海军, 齐英敏, 等. 塔里木盆地古城地区奥陶系天然气勘探重大突破及其启示[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34 (1): 1- 9. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2014.01.001
	Wang Zhaoming , Yang Haijun , Qi Yingmin , et al. Orodovician gas exploration breakthrough in the Gucheng loweruplift of the Tarim Basin and its enlightenment[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34 (1): 1- 9. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2014.01.001
2	闵磊. 塔里木盆地古城低凸起下古生界碳酸盐岩沉积储层特征研究[D]北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2010.
	Min Lei.The characteristics of Carbonatereservoirs in the Lower Paleozoic of Gucheng Low Uplift, Tarim Basin[D].Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2010.
3	郑兴平, 张友, 陈希光, 等. 塔里木盆地东部碳酸盐岩储层特征与天然气勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27 (5): 765- 771.
	Zheng Xingpin , Zhang You , Chen Xiguang , et al. Natural gas exploration domains and analysis of carbonate reservoir characteristics in the east of Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27 (5): 765- 771.
4	尹晓贺, 姜宏宇, 王玉珊, 等. 优选属性预测古城地区白云岩储层[C]//中国石油学会石油物探专业委员会. 中国石油学会2015年物探技术研讨会论文集. 北京: 中国石油学会, 2015: 563-565.
	Yin Xiaohe, Jiang Hongyu, Wang Yushan, et al.Prediction of dolomite reservoirs in Gucheng area by optimizing attributes[C]//Professional Committee of Petroleum Geophysical Prospecting of China Petroleum Institute.Proceedings of 2015 Geophysical Prospecting Technology Seminar of China Petroleum Institute.Beijing: China Petroleum Institute, 2015: 563-565.
5	朱可丹, 张友, 林彤, 等. 基于CT成像的白云岩储层孔喉非均质性分析——以塔东古城地区奥陶系GC601井鹰三段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (4): 862- 873.
	Zhu Kedan , Zhang You , Lin Tong , et al. Pore-throat heterogeneity in dolomite reservoirs based on CT imaging: A case study of the 3rd member of the Ordovician Yingshan Formation in Well GC601 in Gucheng area, eastern Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (4): 862- 873.
6	尤东华, 曹自成, 徐明军, 等. 塔里木盆地奥陶系鹰山组多类型白云岩储层成因机制[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (1): 92- 101.
	You Donghua , Cao Zicheng , Xu Mingjun , et al. Genetic mechanism of multi-type dolomite reservoirs in Ordovician Yingshan Formation, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (1): 92- 101.
7	王小敏. 塔里木盆地中下奥陶统层序-岩相古地理和储层预测[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2012.
	Wang Xiaomin.Sequence stratigraphy and lithofacies paleogeography and carbonate reservoirs evaluation of the Lower-Middle Ordovicia in Tarim Basin[D].Beijing: China University of Geoscience (Beijing), 2012.
8	倪新锋, 沈安江, 陈永权, 等. 塔里木盆地寒武系碳酸盐岩台地类型、台缘分段特征及勘探启示[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, (7): 1245- 1255.
	Ni Xinfeng , Shen Anjiang , Chen Yongquan , et al. Cambrian carbonate plateform types, plateform margin segmentation characteristics and exploration enlightenment in Tarim Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26 (7): 1245- 1255.
9	张亚金, 张湘娟, 张振伟, 等. 古城地区奥陶系鹰山组白云岩储层特征及其控制因素[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2020, 39 (4): 1- 8.
	Zhang Yajin , Zhang Xiangjuan , Zhang Zhenwei , et al. Characteristics and their controlling factors of Ordovician dolomite reservoir in Yingshan Formation in Gucheng area[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2020, 39 (4): 1- 8.
10	王向荣, 李潮流, 邓继新, 等. 塔里木盆地鹰山组致密碳酸盐岩地震岩石物理特征[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2020, 39 (5): 117- 126.
	Wang Xiangrong , Li Chaoliu , Deng Jixin , et al. Seismic petrophysical properties of Yingshan-Formation tight carbonate rock in Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2020, 39 (5): 117- 126.
11	吴斌, 何登发, 孙方源. 塔里木盆地古城低凸起下古生界的断裂特征及成因机制[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26 (5): 871- 879.
	Wu Bin , He Dengfa , Sun Fangyuan . Fault characteristic and genetic mechanisim of the Lower Paleozoic in Gucheng Lower Uplift, Tarim Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26 (5): 871- 879.
12	陈永权, 关宝珠, 熊益学, 等. 复式盖层、走滑断裂带控储控藏作用——以塔里木盆地满西-古城地区下奥陶统白云岩勘探为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26 (7): 1268- 1276.
	Chen Yongquan , Guan Baozhu , Xiong Yixue , et al. Compound cap rocks and slide faults controlling mechanism on reservoir and reserves: An example on Lower Ordovician dolostones exploration in Manxi-Gucheng area, Tarim Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26 (7): 1268- 1276.
13	李昂, 鞠林波, 张丽艳. 塔里木盆地古城低凸起古-中生界构造演化特征与油气成藏关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48 (2): 545- 555.
	Li Ang , Ju Linbo , Zhang Liyan . Relationship between hydrocarbon accumulation and paleo-mesozoic tectonicevolution characteristics of Gucheng Lower Uplift in Tarim basin[J]. Juurnal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48 (2): 545- 555.
14	田明峰, 夏桂兰, 丛培泓, 等. 塔里木盆地古城地区寒武-奥陶系走滑断裂特征及其控油作用[C]//中国石油学会石油物探专业委员会. 中国石油学会2015年物探技术研讨会论文集. 北京: 中国石油学会, 2015: 563-565.
	Tian Mingfeng, Xia Guilan, Cong Peihong, et al.Characteristics of Cambrian-Ordovician strike-slip faults and their role in controlling oil in Gucheng area, Tarim Basin[C]//Petroleum Geophysical Prospecting Committee of China Petroleum Institute.Proceedings of China Petroleum Society 2015 Geophysical Prospecting Technology Symposium.Beijing: China Petroleum Institute, 2015: 563-565.
15	吕修祥, 陈佩佩, 陈坤, 等. 深层碳酸盐岩差异成岩作用对油气分层聚集的影响——以塔里木盆地塔中隆起北斜坡鹰山组为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (5): 957- 971.
	Lyu Xiuxiang , Chen Peipei , Chen Kun , et al. Effects of differential diagenesis of deep carbonate rocks on hydrocarbon zonation and accumulation: A case study of Yingshan Formation on northern slope of Tazhong uplift, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (5): 957- 971.
16	王斌, 赵永强, 何生, 等. 塔里木盆地顺北5号断裂带北段奥陶系油气成藏期次及其控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (5): 965- 974.
	Wang Bin , Zhao Yongqiang , He Sheng , et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation stages and their controlling factors in the northern Ordovician Shunbei 5 fault zone, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (5): 965- 974.
17	何治亮, 罗传荣, 龚铭, 等. 塔里木多旋回盆地与复式油气系统[M]. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 2001: 21- 62.
	He Zhiliang , Luo Chuanrong , Gong Min , et al. Multicycle basin and complex petroleum system in Tarim, China[M]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences Press, 2001: 21- 62.
18	王燮培, 谢德宜. 中国含油气盆地中花状构造的发现及其石油地质意义[J]. 地质科技情报, 1989, 8 (2): 59- 66.
	Wang Xiepei , Xie Deyi . Discovery of flower-like structures in petroliferous basins in China and their petroleum geological significance[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 1989, 8 (2): 59- 66.
19	Beidinger A , Decker K . 3D geometry and kinematics of the Lassee flower structure: Implications for segmentation and seismotectonics of the Vienna Basin strike-slip fault, Austria[J]. Tectonophysics, 2011, 499 (1-4): 22- 40. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2010.11.006
20	Sylverster A G . Strike-slip faults[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1988, 100 (11): 1666- 1703. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1988)100<1666:SSF>2.3.CO;2
21	邓尚, 李慧莉, 韩俊, 等. 塔里木盆地顺北5号走滑断裂中段活动特征及其地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(5): 990-998+1073.
	Deng Shang, Li Huili, Han Jun, et al. Characteristics of the central segment of Shunbei 5 strike-slip fault zone in Tarim Basin and its geological significance[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(5): 990-998+1073.
22	黄太柱. 塔里木盆地塔中北坡构造解析与油气勘探方向[J]. 石油实验地质, 2014, 36 (3): 257- 267.
	Huang Taizhu . Structural interpretation and petroleum exploration targets in northern slope of middle Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2014, 36 (3): 257- 267.
23	李海英, 洪才均, 等. 顺北油田断溶体储层地震响应特征及描述技术[J]. 断块油气田, 2020, 27(1): 45-49.
	Wen Shanshi, Li Haiying, Hong Caijun, et al.Technology of seismic response characteristics and description of fault-karst reservoir in Shunbei Oilfield[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2020, 27(1): 45-49.
24	赵锐, 赵腾, 李慧莉, 等. 塔里木盆地顺北油气田断控缝洞型储层特征与主控因素[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26 (5): 8- 13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2019.05.002
	Zhao Rui , Zhao Teng , Li Huili , et al. Fault-controlled fracture-cavity reservoir characterization and main-controlling factors in the Shunbei hydrocarbon field of Tarim Basin[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2019, 26 (5): 8- 13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2019.05.002
25	张哨楠, 黄柏文, 隋欢, 等. 古城地区鹰山组储层特征及成岩孔隙演化[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41 (1): 33- 46.
	Zhang Shaonan , Huang Bowen , Sui Huan , et al. The reservois characteristicas and the pore evolution of yingshan formaton in Gucheng Region, Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science and Technology Edition), 2019, 41 (1): 33- 46.

[1]	刘永立, 尤东华, 李海英, 高利君, 蒋宏, 张卫峰, 鲍芳. 超深层碳酸盐岩层系硅质岩储层表征与评价——以塔里木盆地塔深6井为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 547-556.
[2]	张君龙, 胡明毅, 汪爱云, 张斌, 闫博, 何香香. 塔里木盆地古城台缘带寒武系丘滩体沉积构型特征及储层分布规律[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 557-569.
[3]	程鑫, 周立宏, 操应长, 金凤鸣, 付立新, 李宏军, 楼达, 远光辉. 黄骅坳陷大港探区下古生界碳酸盐岩潜山差异演化及优质储层成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 673-689.
[4]	林煜, 李相文, 陈康, 张银涛, 臧殿光, 郁智. 深层海相碳酸盐岩储层地震预测关键技术与效果——以四川盆地震旦系-寒武系与塔里木盆地奥陶系油气藏为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 717-727.
[5]	陈槚俊, 何登发, 孙方源, 田方磊. 塔北隆起晚奥陶世—中泥盆世古隆起格局演变[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 285-298.
[6]	宁飞, 云金表, 李建交, 宋海明, 赵亮东. 塔里木盆地巴楚隆起西南缘构造特征与勘探前景[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 299-308.
[7]	易士威, 李明鹏, 范土芝, 杨帆, 方辉, 黄福喜, 金武弟. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷克拉苏和东秋断层上盘勘探突破方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 309-324.
[8]	张永, 郑孟林, 陈槚俊, 邓铭哲, 田方磊, 张伟康, 李英强. 塔里木盆地巴楚隆起玛扎塔格断裂带几何学与运动学特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 325-337.
[9]	王珂, 张荣虎, 王俊鹏, 孙雄伟, 杨学君. 超深层致密砂岩储层构造裂缝分布特征及其成因——以塔里木盆地库车前陆冲断带克深气田为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 338-353.
[10]	田方磊, 彭妙, 韩俊, 陈槚俊, 马德波, 毛丹凤. 塔里木盆地中部深层-超深层地震波组特征及其地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 354-369.
[11]	陈前, 闫相宾, 刘超英, 魏晓亮, 程喆, 秦伟军, 洪太元. 压实对页岩有机质孔隙发育控制作用——以四川盆地东南地区及周缘下古生界为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 76-85.
[12]	卢志远, 何治亮, 余川, 叶欣, 李东晖, 杜伟, 聂海宽. 复杂构造区页岩气富集特征—以四川盆地东南部丁山地区下古生界五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 86-97.
[13]	朱洪建, 琚宜文, 孙岩, 黄骋, 冯宏业, AliRaza, 余坤, 乔鹏, 肖蕾. 构造变形作用下页岩孔裂隙结构演化特征及其模式——以四川盆地及其周缘下古生界海相页岩为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 186-200, 240.
[14]	张天付, 黄理力, 倪新锋, 熊冉, 杨果, 孟广仁, 郑剑锋, 陈薇. 塔里木盆地柯坪地区下寒武统吾松格尔组岩性组合及其成因和勘探意义——亚洲第一深井轮探1井突破的启示[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 928-940.
[15]	李慧莉, 李婧婧, 杨素举, 马中远. 塔里木盆地顺托果勒地区志留系成藏特征与勘探启示[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 941-952.