塔里木盆地古城地区古生界垒-扭叠合复合断层-裂缝体模型

doi:10.11743/ogg20210305

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

塔中地区深层古生界巨厚的碳酸盐岩是当前油气勘探的热点。近年来，在塔中北坡的北西、北东与北东东向断层-裂缝带中取得了油气勘探的重大突破。然而，在其邻近的古城地区断层-裂缝体的研究则一直很薄弱，这一状况严重地制约了该区的油气勘探进程。基于高分辨率三维地震剖面，提出了古城地区古生界垒-扭叠合复合断层-裂缝体模型。其要点是：①剖面上，断层-裂缝体的性质不具有继承性。在深部寒武系、中部中-下奥陶统、上部上奥陶统和顶部石炭系依次发育加里东早期伸展断层-张性裂缝带、加里东中期压扭断层-压剪性裂缝带、加里东晚期张扭断层-张剪性裂缝带和海西早期张扭断层-张剪性裂缝带，它们在垂向上依次叠合。②平面上，自下而上断层-裂缝体的走向发生了明显的顺时针和逆时针旋转。在深部寒武系、中部中-下奥陶统、上部上奥陶统和顶部石炭系断层-裂缝体的走向分别为北东东向、北北东向、北东-北东东向和北东向，它们在横向上依次复合。③剖面上，断层-裂缝体呈现出“上倒锥、下地垒”的形态叠合特点和“上下张性、中间压性”的性质叠合特点。④平面上，断层-裂缝体呈现出“扫帚状”和雁列状的展布特点。

关键词: 断层-裂缝体模型, 走滑断层, 古生界, 塔中隆起北斜坡, 塔里木盆地

Abstract:

The massive carbonate rocks in the deep Paleozoic of Tazhong area are currently a hot spot for oil and gas exploration.Despite several major breakthroughs in oil and gas exploration made along the NW-, NE-, and NEE-trending fault-fracture zones on the northern slope of Tazhong in recent years, the research on fault-fracture bodies in neighboring Gucheng area is yet to be deepened, which has severely restricted the oil and gas exploration in the area.Based on high-resolution 3D seismic sections, this study proposed a Paleozoic superimposed horst-twist fault-fracture body model in Gucheng area, the features of which are summarized as follows.(1) The fault-fracture bodies are not inherited vertically.From the bottom up, i.e.from the Cambrian, Middle-to-Lower Ordovician, Upper Ordovician to Carboniferous, four zones, including the Early Caledonian extensional fault-fracture zone, the Mid-Caledonian transpressional fault-fracture zone, the Late Caledonian transtensional fault-fracture zone and the Early Hercynian transtensional fault-fracture zone are successively developed and superimposed.(2) Horizontally, the strike of the fault-fracture bodies from bottom to top shows obvious clockwise and counterclockwise rotation with those in the deep Cambrian, Middle-to-Lower Ordovician, Upper Ordovician, and top Carboniferous striking NEE, NNE, NE-NEE and NE, respectively and compositely.(3) The fault-fracture bodies feature a superposition that can be roughly described as "an inverted cone in the upper and a horst in the lower", and "being tensile in upper and lower, but compressional in the middle" from a sectional view.(4) The fault-fracture bodies are also distributed in a "broom-shaped" and en echelon arrangement from a map view.

Key words: fault-fracture body model, strike-slip fault, Paleozoic, northern slope of Tazhong Uplift, Tarim Basin

中图分类号:

TE121.2

何光玉,曹自成,姚泽伟,等. 塔里木盆地古城地区古生界垒-扭叠合复合断层-裂缝体模型[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 587-594. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210305 Guangyu He,Zicheng Cao,Zewei Yao,et al. Paleozoic horst-twist superimposed fault-fracture body model in Gucheng area of Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(3): 587-594. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210305

图/表 6

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 25

1	王招明, 杨海军, 齐英敏, 等. 塔里木盆地古城地区奥陶系天然气勘探重大突破及其启示[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34 (1): 1- 9. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2014.01.001
	Wang Zhaoming , Yang Haijun , Qi Yingmin , et al. Orodovician gas exploration breakthrough in the Gucheng loweruplift of the Tarim Basin and its enlightenment[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34 (1): 1- 9. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2014.01.001
2	闵磊. 塔里木盆地古城低凸起下古生界碳酸盐岩沉积储层特征研究[D]北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2010.
	Min Lei.The characteristics of Carbonatereservoirs in the Lower Paleozoic of Gucheng Low Uplift, Tarim Basin[D].Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2010.
3	郑兴平, 张友, 陈希光, 等. 塔里木盆地东部碳酸盐岩储层特征与天然气勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27 (5): 765- 771.
	Zheng Xingpin , Zhang You , Chen Xiguang , et al. Natural gas exploration domains and analysis of carbonate reservoir characteristics in the east of Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27 (5): 765- 771.
4	尹晓贺, 姜宏宇, 王玉珊, 等. 优选属性预测古城地区白云岩储层[C]//中国石油学会石油物探专业委员会. 中国石油学会2015年物探技术研讨会论文集. 北京: 中国石油学会, 2015: 563-565.
	Yin Xiaohe, Jiang Hongyu, Wang Yushan, et al.Prediction of dolomite reservoirs in Gucheng area by optimizing attributes[C]//Professional Committee of Petroleum Geophysical Prospecting of China Petroleum Institute.Proceedings of 2015 Geophysical Prospecting Technology Seminar of China Petroleum Institute.Beijing: China Petroleum Institute, 2015: 563-565.
5	朱可丹, 张友, 林彤, 等. 基于CT成像的白云岩储层孔喉非均质性分析——以塔东古城地区奥陶系GC601井鹰三段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (4): 862- 873.
	Zhu Kedan , Zhang You , Lin Tong , et al. Pore-throat heterogeneity in dolomite reservoirs based on CT imaging: A case study of the 3rd member of the Ordovician Yingshan Formation in Well GC601 in Gucheng area, eastern Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (4): 862- 873.
6	尤东华, 曹自成, 徐明军, 等. 塔里木盆地奥陶系鹰山组多类型白云岩储层成因机制[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (1): 92- 101.
	You Donghua , Cao Zicheng , Xu Mingjun , et al. Genetic mechanism of multi-type dolomite reservoirs in Ordovician Yingshan Formation, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (1): 92- 101.
7	王小敏. 塔里木盆地中下奥陶统层序-岩相古地理和储层预测[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2012.
	Wang Xiaomin.Sequence stratigraphy and lithofacies paleogeography and carbonate reservoirs evaluation of the Lower-Middle Ordovicia in Tarim Basin[D].Beijing: China University of Geoscience (Beijing), 2012.
8	倪新锋, 沈安江, 陈永权, 等. 塔里木盆地寒武系碳酸盐岩台地类型、台缘分段特征及勘探启示[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, (7): 1245- 1255.
	Ni Xinfeng , Shen Anjiang , Chen Yongquan , et al. Cambrian carbonate plateform types, plateform margin segmentation characteristics and exploration enlightenment in Tarim Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26 (7): 1245- 1255.
9	张亚金, 张湘娟, 张振伟, 等. 古城地区奥陶系鹰山组白云岩储层特征及其控制因素[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2020, 39 (4): 1- 8.
	Zhang Yajin , Zhang Xiangjuan , Zhang Zhenwei , et al. Characteristics and their controlling factors of Ordovician dolomite reservoir in Yingshan Formation in Gucheng area[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2020, 39 (4): 1- 8.
10	王向荣, 李潮流, 邓继新, 等. 塔里木盆地鹰山组致密碳酸盐岩地震岩石物理特征[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2020, 39 (5): 117- 126.
	Wang Xiangrong , Li Chaoliu , Deng Jixin , et al. Seismic petrophysical properties of Yingshan-Formation tight carbonate rock in Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2020, 39 (5): 117- 126.
11	吴斌, 何登发, 孙方源. 塔里木盆地古城低凸起下古生界的断裂特征及成因机制[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26 (5): 871- 879.
	Wu Bin , He Dengfa , Sun Fangyuan . Fault characteristic and genetic mechanisim of the Lower Paleozoic in Gucheng Lower Uplift, Tarim Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26 (5): 871- 879.
12	陈永权, 关宝珠, 熊益学, 等. 复式盖层、走滑断裂带控储控藏作用——以塔里木盆地满西-古城地区下奥陶统白云岩勘探为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26 (7): 1268- 1276.
	Chen Yongquan , Guan Baozhu , Xiong Yixue , et al. Compound cap rocks and slide faults controlling mechanism on reservoir and reserves: An example on Lower Ordovician dolostones exploration in Manxi-Gucheng area, Tarim Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26 (7): 1268- 1276.
13	李昂, 鞠林波, 张丽艳. 塔里木盆地古城低凸起古-中生界构造演化特征与油气成藏关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48 (2): 545- 555.
	Li Ang , Ju Linbo , Zhang Liyan . Relationship between hydrocarbon accumulation and paleo-mesozoic tectonicevolution characteristics of Gucheng Lower Uplift in Tarim basin[J]. Juurnal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48 (2): 545- 555.
14	田明峰, 夏桂兰, 丛培泓, 等. 塔里木盆地古城地区寒武-奥陶系走滑断裂特征及其控油作用[C]//中国石油学会石油物探专业委员会. 中国石油学会2015年物探技术研讨会论文集. 北京: 中国石油学会, 2015: 563-565.
	Tian Mingfeng, Xia Guilan, Cong Peihong, et al.Characteristics of Cambrian-Ordovician strike-slip faults and their role in controlling oil in Gucheng area, Tarim Basin[C]//Petroleum Geophysical Prospecting Committee of China Petroleum Institute.Proceedings of China Petroleum Society 2015 Geophysical Prospecting Technology Symposium.Beijing: China Petroleum Institute, 2015: 563-565.
15	吕修祥, 陈佩佩, 陈坤, 等. 深层碳酸盐岩差异成岩作用对油气分层聚集的影响——以塔里木盆地塔中隆起北斜坡鹰山组为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (5): 957- 971.
	Lyu Xiuxiang , Chen Peipei , Chen Kun , et al. Effects of differential diagenesis of deep carbonate rocks on hydrocarbon zonation and accumulation: A case study of Yingshan Formation on northern slope of Tazhong uplift, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (5): 957- 971.
16	王斌, 赵永强, 何生, 等. 塔里木盆地顺北5号断裂带北段奥陶系油气成藏期次及其控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (5): 965- 974.
	Wang Bin , Zhao Yongqiang , He Sheng , et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation stages and their controlling factors in the northern Ordovician Shunbei 5 fault zone, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (5): 965- 974.
17	何治亮, 罗传荣, 龚铭, 等. 塔里木多旋回盆地与复式油气系统[M]. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 2001: 21- 62.
	He Zhiliang , Luo Chuanrong , Gong Min , et al. Multicycle basin and complex petroleum system in Tarim, China[M]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences Press, 2001: 21- 62.
18	王燮培, 谢德宜. 中国含油气盆地中花状构造的发现及其石油地质意义[J]. 地质科技情报, 1989, 8 (2): 59- 66.
	Wang Xiepei , Xie Deyi . Discovery of flower-like structures in petroliferous basins in China and their petroleum geological significance[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 1989, 8 (2): 59- 66.
19	Beidinger A , Decker K . 3D geometry and kinematics of the Lassee flower structure: Implications for segmentation and seismotectonics of the Vienna Basin strike-slip fault, Austria[J]. Tectonophysics, 2011, 499 (1-4): 22- 40. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2010.11.006
20	Sylverster A G . Strike-slip faults[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1988, 100 (11): 1666- 1703. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1988)100<1666:SSF>2.3.CO;2
21	邓尚, 李慧莉, 韩俊, 等. 塔里木盆地顺北5号走滑断裂中段活动特征及其地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(5): 990-998+1073.
	Deng Shang, Li Huili, Han Jun, et al. Characteristics of the central segment of Shunbei 5 strike-slip fault zone in Tarim Basin and its geological significance[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(5): 990-998+1073.
22	黄太柱. 塔里木盆地塔中北坡构造解析与油气勘探方向[J]. 石油实验地质, 2014, 36 (3): 257- 267.
	Huang Taizhu . Structural interpretation and petroleum exploration targets in northern slope of middle Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2014, 36 (3): 257- 267.
23	李海英, 洪才均, 等. 顺北油田断溶体储层地震响应特征及描述技术[J]. 断块油气田, 2020, 27(1): 45-49.
	Wen Shanshi, Li Haiying, Hong Caijun, et al.Technology of seismic response characteristics and description of fault-karst reservoir in Shunbei Oilfield[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2020, 27(1): 45-49.
24	赵锐, 赵腾, 李慧莉, 等. 塔里木盆地顺北油气田断控缝洞型储层特征与主控因素[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26 (5): 8- 13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2019.05.002
	Zhao Rui , Zhao Teng , Li Huili , et al. Fault-controlled fracture-cavity reservoir characterization and main-controlling factors in the Shunbei hydrocarbon field of Tarim Basin[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2019, 26 (5): 8- 13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2019.05.002
25	张哨楠, 黄柏文, 隋欢, 等. 古城地区鹰山组储层特征及成岩孔隙演化[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41 (1): 33- 46.
	Zhang Shaonan , Huang Bowen , Sui Huan , et al. The reservois characteristicas and the pore evolution of yingshan formaton in Gucheng Region, Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science and Technology Edition), 2019, 41 (1): 33- 46.

[1]	韩鹏远, 丁文龙, 杨德彬, 张娟, 马海陇, 王生晖. 塔里木盆地塔河油田S80走滑断裂发育特征及其对奥陶系储层的控制作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 770-786.
[2]	张艳秋, 陈红汉, 王燮培, 王彭, 苏丹梅, 谢舟. 塔里木盆地富满油田走滑断裂带通源性评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 787-800.
[3]	丁文龙, 李云涛, 韩俊, 黄诚, 王来源, 孟庆修. 碳酸盐岩储层高精度构造应力场模拟与裂缝多参数分布预测方法及其应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 827-851.
[4]	曹自成, 云露, 漆立新, 李海英, 韩俊, 耿锋, 林波, 陈菁萍, 黄诚, 毛庆言. 塔里木盆地顺北地区顺北84X井超千米含油气重大发现及其意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 341-356.
[5]	杨德彬, 鲁新便, 鲍典, 曹飞, 汪彦, 王明, 谢润成. 塔里木盆地北部奥陶系海相碳酸盐岩断溶体油藏成因类型及特征再认识[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 357-366.
[6]	张长建, 杨德彬, 蒋林, 姜应兵, 昌琪, 马雪健. 塔里木盆地塔河北部“过溶蚀残留型”断溶体发育特征及其成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 367-383.
[7]	江同文, 邓兴梁, 曹鹏, 常少英. 塔里木盆地富满断控破碎体油藏储集类型特征与注水替油效果[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(2): 542-552.
[8]	牛月萌, 韩俊, 余一欣, 黄诚, 林波, 杨帆, 余浪, 陈俊宇. 塔里木盆地顺北西部地区火成岩侵入体发育特征及其与断裂耦合关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 231-242.
[9]	施振生, 赵圣贤, 周天琪, 孙莎莎, 袁渊, 张成林, 李博, 祁灵. 海相含气页岩水平层理类型、成因及其页岩气意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1499-1514.
[10]	李勇, 朱治同, 吴鹏, 申陈州, 高计县. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘上古生界致密储层含气系统压力演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1568-1581.
[11]	张三, 金强, 史今雄, 胡明毅, 段梦悦, 李永强, 张旭栋, 程付启. 塔北地区奥陶系地下河溶洞充填规律与储集性能[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1582-1594.
[12]	康志江, 张冬梅, 张振坤, 王睿奇, 姜文斌, 刘坤岩. 深层缝洞型油藏井间连通路径智能预测技术[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5): 1290-1299.
[13]	胡伟, 徐婷, 杨阳, 伦增珉, 李宗宇, 康志江, 赵瑞明, 梅胜文. 塔里木盆地超深油气藏流体相行为变化特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 1044-1053.
[14]	张坦, 姚威, 赵永强, 周雨双, 黄继文, 范昕禹, 罗宇. 塔里木盆地巴麦地区石炭系卡拉沙依组年代标尺及地层剥蚀厚度精细计算[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 1054-1066.
[15]	郭宏辉, 冯建伟, 赵力彬. 塔里木盆地博孜—大北地区被动走滑构造特征及其对裂缝发育的控制作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 962-975.