四川盆地元坝地区茅口组台缘浅滩相储层物理模型

doi:10.11743/ogg20210311

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

四川盆地元坝地区元坝7井在茅口组钻遇台缘浅滩储层并获得高产工业气流，取得了油气勘探新领域的重大突破。为进一步落实台缘浅滩储层地震响应特征及其识别方法，根据该区地质地震综合解释成果，构建了与野外实际地层参数相近的三维台缘浅滩储层物理模型。按照实际地震资料采集与处理流程对模型进行了实验室物理模型数据采集与处理，得到了与实际野外地震响应特征相符的物理模拟数据。在此基础上分析了储层地震响应特征及其识别方法。研究结果表明：针对台缘浅滩储层基于大时窗的地震属性分析技术不能准确刻画沉积微相的变化，而依据地质模型精细解释层位和聚焦储层，能够更好的刻画地震相带；储层发育程度影响地震振幅，储层沉积厚度大、物性好，波峰能量强；振幅类属性能够直观的识别浅滩储层发育程度，而频率属性对储层边界识别能力强。

关键词: 地震响应特征, 地震物理模型, 台缘浅滩储层, 茅口组, 元坝地区, 四川盆地

Abstract:

Shoal reservoirs were encountered by Well Yuanba-7 and yielded high industrial gas flow from the Maokou Formation at the platform margins of Yuanba area in Sichuan Basin, marking a major breakthrough in oil and gas exploration frontiers.In order to confirm the seismic response characteristics and identification methods of the reservoirs, the study constructed a three-dimensional physical model of platform-margin shoal reservoirs consistent with the actual formation parameters of the studied area based on the comprehensive geological and seismic interpretations.The model were then modified according to acquired seismic data and processing procedures to obtain physical simulation data for analyzing the seismic response characteristics and assessing prediction methods of the reservoirs.The results show that the seismic attribute analysis based on large time windows for platform-margin shoal reservoirs cannot accurately describe the changes of sedimentary microfacies.Instead, the fine interpretation of strata focusing on reservoirs based on geological models does better.With reservoir thickness and property parameters affecting seismic amplitudes, the method works better with amplitudes clearly revealing the physical properties of reef-shoal reservoirs and frequency attributes mapping the reservoir boundaries.

Key words: seismic response characteristics, seismic physical model, platform-margin shoal reservoir, Maokou Formation, Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

秦贞超,缪志伟,魏建新,等. 四川盆地元坝地区茅口组台缘浅滩相储层物理模型[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 652-660, 746. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210311 Zhenchao Qin,Zhiwei Miu,Jianxin Wei,et al. Seismic physical model of the Maokou Formation reservoirs of platform-margin shoal in Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(3): 652-660, 746. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210311

图/表 11

图1

图2

表1

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

参考文献 33

1	赵宗举, 周慧, 陈轩, 等. 四川盆地及邻区二叠纪层序岩相古地理及有利勘探区带[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33 (S2): 35- 51. doi: 10.7623/syxb2012S2004
	Zhao Zongju , Zhou Hui , Chen Xuan , et al. Sequence lithofacies paleogeography and favorable exploration zones of the Permian in Sichuan Basin and adjacent areas, China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33 (S2): 35- 51. doi: 10.7623/syxb2012S2004
2	胡明毅, 胡忠贵, 魏国齐, 等. 四川盆地茅口组层序岩相古地理特征及储集层预测[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39 (1): 45- 55.
	Hu Mingyi , Hu Zhonggui , Wei Guoqi , et al. Sequence lithofacies paleogeography and reservoir prediction of the Maokou Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39 (1): 45- 55.
3	陈更生, 岳宏. 四川盆地川西南地区下二叠统气藏类型及有效缝洞分布规律[J]. 天然气工业, 1995, 15 (6): 10- 13.
	Chen Gengsheng , Yue Hong . Gas reservoir types and effective fracture-vug distribution laws of Lower Permian series in the southwest area of Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 1995, 15 (6): 10- 13.
4	江青春, 胡素云, 汪泽成, 等. 四川盆地茅口组风化壳岩溶古地貌及勘探选区[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33 (6): 949- 960.
	Jiang Qingchun , Hu Suyun , Wang Zecheng , et al. Paleokarst landform of the weathering crust of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in Sichuan Basin and selection of exploration regions[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33 (6): 949- 960.
5	李大军, 陈辉, 陈洪德, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统茅口组储层形成与古构造演化关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37 (5): 756- 763.
	Li Dajun , Chen Hui , Chen Hongde , et al. Relationship between reservoir development in the Middle Permian Maokou Formation and paleostructure evolution in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37 (5): 756- 763.
6	胡东风. 四川盆地元坝地区茅口组台缘浅滩天然气勘探的突破与启示[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39 (3): 1- 10.
	Hu Dongfeng . Breakthrough in natural gas exploration in the platform margin shoal at the Maokou Fm in the Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin, and its implications[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39 (3): 1- 10.
7	黎荣, 胡明毅, 杨威, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统沉积相模式及有利储集体分布[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40 (2): 369- 379.
	Li Rong , Hu Mingyi , Yang Wei , et al. Sedimentary facies model and favorable reservoir distribution of the Middle Permian in Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40 (2): 369- 379.
8	马德芹, 田景春, 林小兵, 等. 四川盆地二叠系长兴组生物礁发育的差异性及控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (6): 1176- 1187.
	Ma Deqin , Tian Jingchun , Lin Xiaobing , et al. Differences and controlling factors of Changxing Formation reefs of the Permian in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (6): 1176- 1187.
9	郭旭升, 胡东风, 黄仁春, 等. 四川盆地深层-超深层天然气勘探进展与展望[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40 (5): 1- 14.
	Guo Xusheng , Hu Dongfeng , Huang Renchun , et al. Deep and ultra-deep natural gas exploration in the Sichuan Basin: Progress and prospect[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40 (5): 1- 14.
10	凡睿, 高林, 何莉, 等. 川东北飞仙关组鲕滩储层地震预测[J]. 勘探地球物理进展, 2003, 26 (3): 199- 203.
	Fan Rui , Gao Lin , He Li , et al. Prediction of oolitic beach reservoir of Feixianguan Formation in northeast Xuanhan, Northeastern Sichuan[J]. Progress in Exploration Geophysics, 2003, 26 (3): 199- 203.
11	敬鹏贵. 川东北地区礁滩相储层预测技术与应用[J]. 石油物探, 2007, 46 (4): 363- 369. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2007.04.008
	Jing Penggui . Reservoir prediction technology of reef-flat facies in northeast Sichuan province and its application[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2007, 46 (4): 363- 369. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2007.04.008
12	龚洪林. 礁滩体储层正演模拟研究[J]. 新疆石油天然气, 2010, 6 (1): 1- 5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2677.2010.01.001
	Gong Honglin . Forward modeling for reef shoal reservoir[J]. Xinjiang Oil & Gas, 2010, 6 (1): 1- 5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2677.2010.01.001
13	刘军迎, 雍学善, 高建虎. 模型正演技术在碳酸盐岩油气藏地震资料解释中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, (1): 109- 112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2007.01.021
	Liu Junying , Yong Xueshan , Gao Jianhu . The application of forward modeling for interpretation of seismic data of carbonatite reservoir[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, (1): 109- 112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2007.01.021
14	李三福, 肖为, 朱美娟, 等. 深水礁滩相储层地震模型的正演模拟及其地震响应特征分析[J]. 工程地球物理学报, 2011, 8 (1): 91- 96. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7940.2011.01.019
	Li Sanfu , Xiao Wei , Zhu Meijuan , et al. Forwardmodeling and analysis of seismic Response characteristic in the deep water reef-flat reservoirs model[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics, 2011, 8 (1): 91- 96. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7940.2011.01.019
15	李香华, 张婷, 李洪玺. 阿姆河右岸区块深水低能缓坡礁滩分布综合预测[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39 (11): 1- 9. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2019.11.001
	Li Xianghua , Zhang Ting , Li Hongxi . Integrated prediction on the distribution of reef beach in the depositional environment of low-energy deepwater slopes in the Amu Darya Right Bank Block[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39 (11): 1- 9. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2019.11.001
16	但志伟, 肖为, 方中于, 等. 碳酸盐岩生物礁地震响应特征的数值模拟[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 40 (3): 345- 349. doi: 10.3876/j.issn.1000-1980.2012.03.017
	Dan Zhiwei , Xiao Wei , Fang Zhongyu , et al. Numerical simulation of seismic response characteristics of carbonate reef[J]. Journal of Hohai University(Natural Sciences), 2012, 40 (3): 345- 349. doi: 10.3876/j.issn.1000-1980.2012.03.017
17	熊晓军, 贺振华, 黄德济. 生物礁地震响应特征的数值模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2009, 30 (1): 75- 79.
	Xiong Xiaojun , He Zhenhua , Huang Deji . Numerical simulation on seismic response features of reef[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009, 30 (1): 75- 79.
18	彭才, 郑荣才, 陈辉, 等. 开江—梁平海槽东侧长兴组生物礁发育主控因素及地震精细预测技术[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41 (4): 614- 620.
	Peng Cai , Zheng Rongcai , Chen Hui , et al. Reef control factors and new seismic prediction techniques of Changxing Formation, east of Kaijiang-Liangping Trough, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41 (4): 614- 620.
19	黄继伟, 熊晓军, 贺振华. 三维生物礁滩建模及地震数值模拟[J]. 物探化探计算技术, 2014, 36 (3): 326- 330. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1749.2014.03.13
	Huang Jiwei , Xiong Xiaojun , He Zhenhua . 3D seismic numerical simulation for biological reef and bank models[J]. Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2014, 36 (3): 326- 330. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1749.2014.03.13
20	郭军参, 张辉. 礁滩型碳酸盐岩储层建模方法研究[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2020, 34(1): 16-19.
	Guo Juncan et al. Study on modeling method of reef-shoal carbonate reservoir[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2020, 34(1): 16-19.
21	狄帮让, 魏建新, 夏永革. 三维地震物理模型技术的效果与精度研究[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2002, 37 (6): 562- 568. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7210.2002.06.003
	Di Bangrang , Wei jianxin , Xia Yongge . Study on effects and precision of 3-D seismic physical model technique[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2002, 37 (6): 562- 568. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7210.2002.06.003
22	赵群, 曲寿利, 薛诗桂, 等. 碳酸盐岩溶洞物理模型地震响应特征研究[J]. 石油物探, 2010, 49 (4): 351- 358. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2010.04.004
	Zhao Qun , Qu Shouli , Xue Shigui , et al. Study on the seismic response characteristics on the physical model of carbonate cave[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2010, 49 (4): 351- 358. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2010.04.004
23	李凡异, 魏建新, 狄帮让, 等. 碳酸盐岩孔洞储层地震物理模型研究[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2016, 51 (2): 272- 280.
	Li Fanyi , Wei Jianxin , Di Bangrang , et al. Seismic physical model of carbonate cavern reservoirs[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2016, 51 (2): 272- 280.
24	王玲玲, 魏建新, 黄平, 等. 裂缝储层地震物理模拟研究[J]. 石油科学通报, 2017, 2 (2): 210- 227.
	Wang Lingling , Wei Jianxin , Huang Ping , et al. Study of seismic physical modelling of fractured reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2017, 2 (2): 210- 227.
25	司文朋, 薛诗桂, 马灵伟, 等. 顺北走滑断裂-断溶体物理模拟及地震响应特征分析[J]. 石油物探, 2019, 58 (6): 911- 919. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2019.06.014
	Si Wenpeng , Xue shigui , Ma Lingwei , et al. Physical modeling and analysis of the characteristics of the seismic response of strike-slip faults and the associated fracture-dissolution reservoirs in the Shunbei area[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2019, 58 (6): 911- 919. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2019.06.014
26	魏建新, 牟永光, 狄帮让. 三维地震物理模型的研究[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2002, 37 (6): 556- 561. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7210.2002.06.002
	Wei Jianxin , Mou Yongguang , Di Bangrang . Study of 3-D seismic physical model[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2002, 37 (6): 556- 561. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7210.2002.06.002
27	曾富英, 杨威, 孙爱, 等. 四川盆地川中地区震旦系灯影组台地边缘相带地震识别及其分段特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38 (6): 1079- 1086.
	Zeng Fuying , Yang Wei , Sun Ai , et al. Seismic recognition and zonation of the platform margin facies of the Sinian Dengying Formation in central Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38 (6): 1079- 1086.
28	常少英, 李昌, 陈娅娜, 等. 海相碳酸盐岩储层地震预测技术进展及应用实效[J]. 海相油气地质, 2020, 25 (1): 22- 34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2020.01.003
	Chang Shaoying , Li Chang , Chen Yana , et al. Progress and application of seismic prediction technology for marine carbonate reservoir[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2020, 25 (1): 22- 34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2020.01.003
29	李宗杰, 王鹏, 陈绪云, 等. 塔里木盆地顺南地区超深白云岩储层地震、地质综合预测[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41 (1): 59- 67.
	Li Zongjie , Wang Peng , Chen Xuyun , et al. Integrated seismic and geological prediction of ultra-deep dolomite reservoir in Shunnan area, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41 (1): 59- 67.
30	郭彤楼. 元坝气田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40 (6): 748- 760.
	Guo Tonglou . Gas accumulation conditions and key exploration & development technologies in Yuanba gas field[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40 (6): 748- 760.
31	肖秋红, 李雷涛, 屈大鹏, 等. YB地区长兴组礁滩地震相精细刻画[J]. 石油物探, 2012, 51 (1): 98- 103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2012.01.014
	Xiao Qiuhong , Li Leitao , Qu Dapeng , et al. Fine description on the seismic facies of reef-beach reservoir in ChangxingFormation, YB area[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2012, 51 (1): 98- 103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2012.01.014
32	王银, 李文成, 陈会霞, 等. YB地区茅口组三段礁滩地震相精细刻画技术与应用[J]. 物探化探计算技术, 2020, 42 (6): 695- 703. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1749.2020.06.02
	Wang Yin , Li Wencheng , Chen Huixia , et al. Fine characterization technology and application of reef-beach seismic facies in the third member of Maokou Formation in YB area[J]. Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2020, 42 (6): 695- 703. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1749.2020.06.02
33	苏建龙, 蒲勇, 缪志伟, 等. 元坝地区灯影组四段丘滩体相控储层预测[J]. 石油物探, 2020, 59 (4): 607- 615. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2020.04.011
	Su Jianlong , Pu Yong , Miao Zhiwei , et al. Facies-controlled reservoir prediction for the bioherm beach of the fourth member of Dengying Formation in the Yuanba area, China[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2020, 59 (4): 607- 615. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2020.04.011

地层	储层类型	实际参数
地层	储层类型	厚度/m	纵波速度/(m·s^-1)	密度/(g·cm^-3)
飞仙关组	上覆层	300	4 400	2.20
长兴组	薄层	80	6 000	2.60
吴家坪组	薄层	20	4 700	2.55
茅三段	茅三段三期滩	10	6 000	2.65
	茅三段滩间泥	10	4 700	2.55
	茅三段二期滩	60~80	6 000	2.65
	茅三段底部泥岩	10~30	4 700	2.55
茅二段	下覆层	500	6 100	2.73

[1]	宋金民, 张亚雄, 尹柯惟, 刘树根, 陈宗于, 李智武, 田艳红, 孙玮, 刘颖, 金鑫, 赵玲丽. 四川盆地中部地区下寒武统龙王庙组混积特征及其地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 627-638, 701.
[2]	黎霆, 诸丹诚, 杨明磊, 李平平, 邹华耀. 热液活动对四川盆地中西部地区二叠系茅口组白云岩的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 639-651.
[3]	沈安江, 乔占峰, 佘敏, 蒙绍兴, 张杰, 王鑫. 基于溶蚀模拟实验的碳酸盐岩埋藏溶蚀孔洞预测方法——以四川盆地龙王庙组储层为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 690-701.
[4]	刘诗琦, 陈森然, 刘波, 石开波, 刘钰洋, 郑浩夫, 罗清清. 基于原位溶蚀模拟实验的四川盆地二叠系栖霞组-茅口组白云岩孔隙演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 702-716.
[5]	林煜, 李相文, 陈康, 张银涛, 臧殿光, 郁智. 深层海相碳酸盐岩储层地震预测关键技术与效果——以四川盆地震旦系-寒武系与塔里木盆地奥陶系油气藏为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 717-727.
[6]	李平平, 王淳, 邹华耀, 余新亚. 团簇同位素在白云岩化流体恢复中的应用与局限性[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 738-746.
[7]	邓宾, 何宇, 黄家强, 罗强, 杨荣军, 于豪, 张静, 刘树根. 前陆盆地形成与演化砂箱物理模拟启示——以四川盆地西部龙门山为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 401-415.
[8]	杨金赫. 盆-山转换带构造变形特征及成因机制——以四川盆地东南部桑木场背斜为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 416-429.
[9]	朱毅秀, 金振奎, 金科, 郭芪恒, 王欢, 吕品, 王昕尧, 师源. 中国陆相湖盆细粒沉积岩岩石学特征及成岩演化表征——以四川盆地元坝地区下侏罗统大安寨段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 494-508.
[10]	何治亮, 聂海宽, 李双建, 刘光祥, 丁江辉, 边瑞康, 卢志远. 特提斯域板块构造约束下上扬子地区二叠系龙潭组页岩气的差异性赋存[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 1-15.
[11]	王红岩, 施振生, 孙莎莎, 张磊夫. 四川盆地及周缘志留系龙马溪组一段深层页岩储层特征及其成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 66-75.
[12]	沈骋, 任岚, 赵金洲, 陈铭培. 页岩岩相组合划分标准及其对缝网形成的影响——以四川盆地志留系龙马溪组页岩为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 98-106, 123.
[13]	孙莎莎, 董大忠, 李育聪, 王红岩, 施振生, 黄世伟, 昌燕, 拜文华. 四川盆地侏罗系自流井组大安寨段陆相页岩油气地质特征及成藏控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 124-135.
[14]	刘忠宝, 胡宗全, 刘光祥, 刘珠江, 刘晧天, 郝景宇, 王鹏威, 李鹏. 四川盆地东北部下侏罗统自流井组陆相页岩储层孔隙特征及形成控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 136-145.
[15]	朱洪建, 琚宜文, 孙岩, 黄骋, 冯宏业, AliRaza, 余坤, 乔鹏, 肖蕾. 构造变形作用下页岩孔裂隙结构演化特征及其模式——以四川盆地及其周缘下古生界海相页岩为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 186-200, 240.