基于多元回归分析的致密油可采资源评价方法

doi:10.11743/ogg20180621

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 由于非常规油气的特殊聚集特征，常规资源评价方法已很难获得较为可靠的致密油可采资源。以北美二叠盆地狼营组B₁₂段成熟致密油区为基础，提出一种基于多元回归分析评价致密油可采资源的新方法。该方法通过致密油井产层地质参数与实际产量数据的关系，建立评价致密油可采资源的评价模型，利用相关性分析和多元回归方法确定各地质参数及对应的影响系数，获得研究区致密油可采资源丰度的计算模型，进而计算出研究区内的致密油可采资源量。实例解剖结果表明，SJ区地质因素对狼营组B₁₂段致密油可采资源的影响从大到小依次为：脆性矿物含量、成熟度、孔隙度、含油饱和度；建立的模型预测的产量与实际产量的相关系数可达0.788 5，区内致密油可采资源总量为4 615×10⁴ t。由于多元回归的致密油评价模型与产量直接对应，增加对产量的约束，即可获得区内致密油可采资源Ⅰ类为44×10⁴ t，Ⅱ类为2 483×10⁴ t，Ⅲ类为1 869×10⁴ t。基于多元回归分析的致密油评价结果更为有效，应用范围更为广阔。

关键词: 多元回归, 可采资源量, 资源评价, 致密油, 非常规油气, 二叠盆地, 北美地区

Abstract: It is hard to reliablely estimate recoverable resources of tight oil by means of conventional resource evaluation methods due to the abnormal features of unconventional oil and gas accumulation.Through the study of the productive tight oil play in the B₁₂ interval of Wolfcamp Formation in the Permian Basin of North America,we proposed a new me- thod for evaluating recoverable tight oil resources in the Permian Basin based on multiple regression analysis.In line with the correlation between the geological parameters of pay zones and the actual production of the tight oil play,a model for evaluating recoverable tight oil was established;then,the geological parameters and their corresponding influence coefficients were determined by correlation and multiple regression analyses,so as to get the calculation model for recoverable tight oil abundance in the study area.Finally,the volume of recoverable tight oil in the study area was worked out.After the detailed analysis of SJ area in the Permian Basin,the geological factors affecting the recovery of tight oil can be graded in terms of significance as follows: brittle mineral content,maturity,porosity and oil saturation,with the degree of significance decreasing from the beginning.Meanwhile,the correlation coefficient between the predicted yield by the model and the practical yield reaches 0.7885,signifying the reliability of the model,and the total volume of recoverable tight oil is 46.15 million tons.Since the tight oil evaluation model based on multiple regression corresponds directly with the production,after setting the constraints on production,we can also get to know that the recoverable volumes of Type Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ tight oil are 0.44,24.83 and 18.69 million tons,respectively.In summary,the new model based on multiple regression analysis is more effective for assessing recoverable tight oil resources and thus its scope of application is broader.

Key words: multiple regression, recoverable resource, resource assessment, tight oil, unconventional oil and gas, Permian Basin, North America

中图分类号:

TE155

张新顺,王红军,马锋,等. 基于多元回归分析的致密油可采资源评价方法[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(6): 1323-1335. doi: 10.11743/ogg20180621 Zhang Xinshun,Wang Hongjun,Ma Feng,et al. Method to assess recoverable tight oil based on multiple regression analysis[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(6): 1323-1335. doi: 10.11743/ogg20180621

参考文献

[1] EIA.Annual energy outlook 2017[EB/OL].[2017-01-05].http://wwweiagov/outlooks/aeo/indexcfm.
[2] Hartenergy.North American Shale Quarterly[EB/OL].[2015-03-01].http://nasqhartenergycom.
[3] EIA.Technically recoverable shale oil and shale gas resources:an assessment of 137 shale formations in 41 countries outside the United States[EB/OL].[2013-05-01].http://wwweiagov/analysis/studies/worldshalegas.
[4] 王红军,马锋,童晓光,等.全球非常规油气资源评价[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(6):850-862. Wang Hongjun,Ma Feng,Tong Xiaoguang,et al.Assessment of global unconventional oil and gas resources.[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(6):850-862.
[5] Jarvie D M.Shale resource systems for oil and gas:Part 2- Shale-oil resource systems[M]//Breyer J A.Shale reservoirs-Giant resources for the 21st century.Tulsa:AAPG,2012:89-119.
[6] 邹才能,张国生,杨智,等.非常规油气概念,特征,潜力及技术——兼论非常规油气地质学[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(4):385-399. Zou Caineng,Zhang Guosheng,Yang Zhi,et al.Geological concepts,characteristics,resource potential and key techniques of unconventional hydrocarbon:On unconventional petroleum geology[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(4):385-399.
[7] 赵靖舟,李军,曹青,等.论致密大油气田成藏模式[J].石油与天然气地质,2013,34(5):573-583. Zhao Jingzhou,Li Jun,Cao Qing,et al.Hydrocarbon accumulation patterns of large tight oil and gas fields[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2013,34(5):573-583.
[8] IHS.Going global:Predicting the next tight oil revolution[EB/OL].[2014-09-01].http://wwwihscom/products/cera.
[9] 邱振,邹才能,李建忠,等.非常规油气资源评价进展与未来展望[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(2):238-246. Qiu Zhen,Zou Caineng,Li Jianzhong,et al.Unconventional petroleum resources assessment:Progress and future prospects[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(2):238-246.
[10] 王社教,李峰,郭秋麟,等.致密油资源评价方法及关键参数研究[J].天然气地球科学,2016,27(9):1576-1582. Wang Shejiao,Li Feng,Guo Qiulin,et al.Tight oil resource assessment methods and key parameters[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2016,27(9):1576-1582.
[11] 杨智,侯连华,陶士振,等.致密油与页岩油形成条件与"甜点区"评价[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(5):555-565. Yang Zhi,Hou Lianhua,Tao Shizhen,et al.Formation conditons and "sweet spot" evaluation of tight oil and shale oil[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(5):555-565.
[12] 邹才能,杨智,张国生,等.常规-非常规油气"有序聚集"理论认识及实践意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(1):14-27. Zou Caineng,Yang Zhi,Zhang Guosheng,et al.Conventional and unconventional petroleum "orderly accumulation":Concept and practical significance.[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(1):14-27.
[13] 张国印,王志章,郭旭光,等.准噶尔盆地乌夏地区风城组云质岩致密油特征及"甜点"预测[J].石油与天然气地质,2015,36(2):219-229. Zhang Guoyin,Wang Zhizhang,Guo Xuguang,et al.Characteristics and "sweet spot" prediction of dolomitic tight oil reservoirs of Fengcheng Formation in Wuxia area,Junggar Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology.2015,36(2):219-229.
[14] 朱华,姜文利,边瑞康,等.页岩气资源评价方法体系及其应用——以川西坳陷为例[J].天然气工业,2009,29(12):130-134. Zhu Hua,Jiang Wenli,Bian Ruikang,et al.Shale gas assessment methodology and its application:A case study of the western Sichuan Depression[J].Natural Gas Industry,2009,29(12):130-134.
[15] 郭秀英,陈义才,张鉴,等.页岩气选区评价指标筛选及其权重确定方法——以四川盆地海相页岩为例[J].天然气工业,2015,35(10):57-64. Guo Xiuying,Chen Yicai,Zhang Jian,et al.Assessment index selection and weight determination of shale gas plays:A case study of marine shale in the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2015,35(10):57-64.
[16] 王社教,郭秋麟,吴晓智,等.致密油资源评价技术与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2015. Wang Shejiao,Guo Qiulio,Wu Xiaozhi,et al.Evaluation technology and application of tight oil resources[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2015.
[17] Lovell M C.Seasonal adjustment of economic time series and multiple regression analysis[J].Journal of the American Statistical Association,1963,58(304):993-1010.
[18] Musil C M,Jones S L,Warner C D.Structural equation modeling and its relationship to multiple regression and factor analysis[J].Research in Nursing & Health,1998,21(3):271-81.
[19] Xue G,Datta-Gupta A,Valko P,et al.Optimal transformations for multiple regression:application to permeability estimation from well logs[J].SPE Formation Evaluation,1997,12(2):85-94.
[20] Preacher K J C P J,Bauer D J.Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression,multilevel modeling,and latent curve analysis[J].Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics,2006,31(4):437-448.
[21] 王越.低渗透油田可采储量标定方法研究[D].成都:西南石油大学,2009. Wang Yue.Research on calibration method of recoverable reserves in low permeability oilfield[D].Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University,2009.
[22] 郭秋麟,李峰,陈宁生,等.致密油资源评价方法、软件及关键技术[J].天然气地球科学,2016,27(9):1566-1575. Guo Qiulin,Li feng,Chen Ningsheng,et al.Methodology,new software system and key technology for tight oil resources assessment[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2016,27(9):1566-1575.
[23] 石广仁.支持向量机在多地质因素分析中的应用[J].石油学报,2008,29(2),195-198. Shi Guangren.Application of support vector machine to multi-geolo-gical-factor analysis[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2008,29(2),195-198.
[24] Gentry R,Mccray A.The effect of reservoir and fluid properties on production decline curves[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1978,30(9):1327-1341.
[25] Lund L.Decline curve analysis of shale oil production:The case of Eagle Ford[D].Uppsala:Uppsala University,2014:12-51.
[26] Ruppel S C,Bebout D G.Competing effects of depositional architecture and diagenesis on carbonate reservoir development:grayburg formation,South Cowden Field,West Texas[M].Texas:Bureau of Economic Geology,University of Texas at Austin,2001.
[27] C & C.C & C reservoirs[EB/OL].[2015-12-30].http://www.ccreservoirs.com.
[28] Murphy R.Depositional systems interpretation of early permian mixed siliciclastics and carbonates,Midland Basin,Texas[D].Bloomington:Indiana University,2015.
[29] Baumgardner J R W,Hamlin H S,Rowe H D.High-resolution core studies of Wolfcamp/Leonard basinal facies,southern Midland Basin Texas[C]//American Association of Petroleum Geologists Search and Discovery Article (10607).Texas:AAPG,2014.
[30] Zhang X S,Wang H J,Ma F,et al.Classification and characteristics of tight oil plays[J].Petroleum Science,2016,13(1):18-33.
[31] Hamlin H S,Baumgardner R W.Wolfberry (wolfcampian-leonardian) deep-water depositional systems in the Midland Basin:stratigraphy,lithofacies,reservoirs,and source rocks[M].West Texas:Bureau of Economic Geology,University of Texas at Austin,2012.
[32] IHS.Exploration,production,and midstream information and analysis spanning over 250 countries.[EB/OL].[2016-02-01].https://my.ihs.com/Energy.
[33] Nathans L L,Oswald F L,Nimon K.Interpreting multiple linear regression:A guidebook of variable importance[J].Practical Assessment,Research & Evaluation,2012,17(9):1-19.
[34] 王惠文,孟洁.多元线性回归的预测建模方法[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2007,33(4),500-504. Wang Huiwen,Meng Jie.Predictive modeling on multivariate linear regression[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2007,33(4),500-504.
[35] Gaswirth S B,Marra K R,Cook T A,et al.Assessment of undisco-vered oil resources in the bakken and three forks formations,Williston Basin Province,Montana,North Dakota,and South Dakota,2013[EB/OL].[2013-12-20].https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/fs20133013.
[36] Pollastro R M,Roberts L N,Cook T A.Geologic assessment of technically recoverable oil in the Devonian and Mississippian Bakken Formation[C]//Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-69-W.US Geological Survey,2013.