石油与天然气地质 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 138-149.doi: 10.11743/ogg20230111

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

塔里木盆地顺南1井和顺南4井油气相态演化的数值模拟与预测

黄越义1,2,3(), 廖玉宏1,2(), 陈承声1,2, 史树勇1,2, 王云鹏1,2, 彭平安1,2   

  1. 1.中国科学院 广州地球化学研究所 有机地球化学国家重点实验室,广东 广州 510640
    2.中国科学院 深地科学卓越创新中心 广东 广州 510640
    3.中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-06 修回日期:2022-11-16 出版日期:2023-01-14 发布日期:2023-01-13
  • 通讯作者: 廖玉宏 E-mail:huangyy@gig.ac.cn;liaoyh@gig.ac.cn
  • 第一作者简介:黄越义(1992—),男,博士研究生,有机地球化学。E?mail: huangyy@gig.ac.cn
  • 基金项目:
    中国科学院A类战略性先导科技专项(XDA14010103);有机地球化学国家重点实验室自主课题(SKLOG2020-1)

Numerical simulation and prediction of hydrocarbon phase evolution of wells Shunnan 1 and 4, Tarim Basin

Yueyi HUANG1,2,3(), Yuhong LIAO1,2(), Chengsheng CHEN1,2, Shuyong SHI1,2, Yunpeng WANG1,2, Ping’an PENG1,2   

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, CAS, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China
    2.Center for Excellence in Deep Earth Science, CAS, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China
    3.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2022-06-06 Revised:2022-11-16 Online:2023-01-14 Published:2023-01-13
  • Contact: Yuhong LIAO E-mail:huangyy@gig.ac.cn;liaoyh@gig.ac.cn

摘要:

塔里木盆地顺南1井和顺南4井位置相近且地质背景相似,埋藏史、热演化史和压力史也基本相似,显示两井的原油都曾遭受过严重的热裂解,但油气相态差异显著,顺南1井为凝析气藏伴生凝析油,顺南4井为典型干气藏。顺南1井和顺南4井的油气相态演化过程以及导致这种相态差异的原因尚待解析。结合原油的黄金管封闭体系热模拟实验数据与实际地质背景资料,利用PetroMod软件和PVTsim软件完成了塔里木盆地顺南1井和顺南4井油气相态演化的数值模拟和预测,并与现今烃流体的组成和相态进行了比较。研究结果表明:顺南1井鹰山组油气藏在34 Ma由液相进入凝析气相,直到现今仍保持凝析气相,其凝析油正构烷烃摩尔浓度与碳数成非常好的线性关系,指示其未曾受气侵、蒸发分馏或多期充注等的影响;而顺南4井鹰山组油气藏在49 Ma由液相进入凝析气相,并很可能在22~10 Ma(中新世)遭受了来自寒武系烃源岩的过成熟干气的气侵作用;气侵通道应该为顺南地区发育的多条北东向断裂,气侵强度由东向西逐渐减弱,到顺南1井所在区域时已无明显气侵作用,这是顺南1井和顺南4井在组分和相态上存在明显差异的主要原因。

关键词: 气侵作用, 盆地模拟, PVTsim软件, 油气相态, 原油, 油气藏, 顺南地区, 塔里木盆地

Abstract:

The wells Shunnan 1 and 4 in the Tarim Basin are located close to each other and have similar geological backgrounds. The reservoirs therein are similar in burial history, thermal history and pressure history, with their crude oils having undergone severe thermal cracking. However, the two wells are significantly different in hydrocarbon phase: the reservoir in well Shunnan 1 is of gas condensate type, while that in the well Shunnan 4 is typical of dry gas type. The hydrocarbon phase evolution processes of the two wells and the reasons for the phase difference between the two wells are yet to disclose. In this study, the thermal simulation data from the gold tube closed system experiment of crude oils in combination with the actual geological setting information are applied to the numerical simulation and prediction of hydrocarbon phase evolution of wells Shunnan 1 and 4 in the Tarim Basin via PetroMod and PVTsim, and the simulation results are compared with the composition and phase of present hydrocarbon fluids. The results show that the hydrocarbon reservoir in the Yingshan Formation in well Shunnan 1 varied from liquid phase to gas condensate phase at 34 Ma and remains in gas condensate phase till now. The molar concentration of n-alkane in the gas condensates has a very good linear relationship with the carbon number, indicating that it was not affected by gas invasion, evaporative fractionation or multi-stage charging. The hydrocarbon reservoir in the Yingshan Formation in well Shunnan 4 transformed from liquid phase to gas condensate phase at 49 Ma, and probably suffered gas invasion in the Miocene (22?10 Ma) by over-mature dry gas from the Cambrian source rocks through channels of multiple NE-striking faults developed in Shunnan area. The gas invasion got weakened from east to west and disappeared in well Shunnan 1. This is the main reason for the marked difference in composition and phase between wells Shunnan 1 and 4.

Key words: gas invasion, basin modeling, PVTsim, hydrocarbon phase, crude oil, hydrocarbon reservoir, Shunnan area, Tarim Basin

中图分类号: